9;:@)! ]:y@:' 8 # ! ! b $! % @3 a4 & !') * ! 1 ! ;6v. *...

Post on 14-Oct-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science under a Creative Commons Attribution4.0 International License.

Dieses Werk wurde im Jahr 2013 vom Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschungin Zusammenarbeit mit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung derWissenschaften e.V. digitalisiert und unter folgender Lizenz veröffentlicht:Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 Lizenz.

1412 Notizen

The Crystal Structure of Cesium Fluorotrioxochromate(VI), CsCr03FPeter Rögner, Klaus-Jürgen Range*Institute of Inorganic Chemistry,University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany

Z. Naturforsch. 50b, 1412-1414 (1995); received April 24, 1995

Cesium Fluorotrioxochromate(VI),Crystal Structure

The crystal structure of C sC r03F was deter­mined from single-crystal X-ray data as tetrago­nal, space group FVamd, with a = 5.7429(3), c = 14.505(1) A and Z = 4. The structure was refined to R - 0.028, R w = 0.022 for 307 unique re­flections.

In contrast to the earlier literature C sC r03F is not isomorphous with scheelite but with a- C sR e0 4. The structure contains isolated C r03F tetrahedra which are linked together by twelve­fold coordinated Cs= ions. The average C r -0 ,F distance is 1.633(4) A.

Among the fluorotrioxochromates MIC r0 3F the salt with M 1 = K crystallizes with the tetragonal scheelite-type structure (space group I4j/a), those with M 1 = Rb,NH4 are isotypic with B aS 04 [1]. For the cesium compound, C sC r03F, Ketelaar and Wegerif [2] found a tetragonal unit cell with a = 5.715(5) and c = 14.5(1) A. They also postulated space group I4j/a and hence the scheelite structure for C sC r03F. Such a morphotropic relation schee­lite —* barite and back to scheelite again with increasing cationic radius of the M 1 cations would be quite unique and difficult to understand.

During our investigations on perrhenates [3] we recently refined the crystal structure of a-C sR e04, the high-temperature modification of cesium per- rhenate [4]. The tetragonal lattice constants are a = 5.9607, c = 14.446 A and c/a = 2.423. In con­trast to the earlier literature [5], in which space group \Axla (and therefore a scheelite type struc­ture) was assumed for a-C sR e04, we could con­firm the space group I4j/amd to be the right one.

Another compound which crystallizes in the a- C sR e04 structure type is cesium perbromate, C sB r04 [6] with unit cell parameters a - 5.75, c =

* Reprint requests to Prof. K.-J. Range.

14.82 A and c/a = 2.58. Though the crystal struc­ture was originally described in space group I4x/a, we found that space group Mj/amd is appropriate for C sB r04 [7].

The same is true for cesium fluorotrioxosulfa- te(VI), C sS03F {a = 5.6317, c = 14.1991 Ä, c/a = 2.521) which crystallizes with the a -C sR e0 4 struc­ture (space group I4j/amd, [8]) and not with the scheelite structure (space group R ^ a ) as pre­viously postulated [9].

Looking at the axial ratios c/a, there is a definite difference between K C r0 3F (c/a = 2.371 [1] and C sC r03F (c/a = 2.539 [2]). Regarding the similari­ties between a -C sR e0 4, C sB r04, C sS03F and C sC r03F with respect to the unit cell dimensions a scheelite type structure of C sC r0 3F became questionable. We therefore decided to reinvesti­gate the crystal structure of C sC r03F with modern single-crystal methods.

Cesium fluorotrioxochromate was prepared by dissolution of cesium dichromate (prepared from C r0 3 (puriss., Merck) and Cs2C 0 3 (p.a., Fluka)) in hot hydrofluoric acid (38-40% , puriss., Merck) and subsequent slow cooling of the clear, orange- coloured solution to room temperature. A tetrago- nal-bipyramidal crystal of C sC r03F (crystallo­graphic forms {112}, {001} and {101} ) with approxi-

Table I. Crystal data, data collection and refinement parameters for CsCrC^F1.

Formula CsCrO^FMolecular weight 251.90 g.m ol- 1Space group 14,/amd (No. 141)Cell dimensions a = 5.7429(3) A

Z

c = 14.505(1) Ä d a = 2.5257(2) V = 478.39(4)4

F(000) 448Temperature 296(1) KRadiation M oKa (X = 0.71073 A)Scan mode co-2 <9Scan width (0.7 + 0.35 tan <9)°2 0 range 2° < 2 0 < 70°/i Ac /-limits - 9 < / z < 9 ; 0 < / t < 9 ; 0 < / < 2 3(sin 6 >/A)max 0.81 A " 1

Recorded reflections 1290Unique reflections, /?jnt 307, 0.022Reflections used in least 307

squares refinement Parameters refined 13(-̂ /oOmax 0 . 0 0 1

Extinction coefficient g 4.8(1).10' 7

Final R, R tv 0.028,0.022( l̂(?)max. min +0.5, -0 .6 e .Ä ”3

a Here, as in the following tables, the standard devia­tions are given in parentheses.

0932 - 0776/95/0900-1412 $06.00 © 1995 Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. All rights reserved. D

Notizen 1413

mate dimensions 0.11 x 0.10 x 0.08 mm3 was used for the structure determination.

Precession photographs exhibited the Laue class 4/mmm and the reflection conditions (h k l): h + k + I = 2 n, ( h k 0): h, k = I n and ( h k l ) : 2/z + I = An which uniquely indicated the space group Rj/am d. A scheelite type structure could therefore be ex­cluded with certainty.

Data collection was performed on an Enraf- Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer using M oKa radia­tion (graphite monochromator in incident beam). The unit cell parameters were obtained by a least- squares refinement based on 23 carefully centered reflections in the range 9.8 < 0 < 18.6°. Three standard reflections were measured every 100 min, indicating only random fluctuations in intensity. After reduction of the 1290 recorded data a set of 307 independent reflections with I > 0a(I) re­mained (Rint - 0 .022), of which all were used in the subsequent calculations. Crystallographic and experimental data are summarized in Table I.

All calculations were carried out using the pro­grams SHELX-76 [10] and SHELXS-86 [11]. Atomic scattering factors and corrections for anomalous dispersion were taken from the In­ternational Tables for X-ray Crystallography [12],

The structure was solved by Patterson methods, followed by successive difference Fourier synthe­ses. The final full-matrix least-squares refinement (including anisotropic displacement factors and an extinction correction of the form Fcorr = Fc(l - gFc2/sin 0 ) converged at R = 0.028 and R w - 0.022. Atomic positions and displacement factors for C sC r03F are given in Table II, derived atomic dis­tances and angles in Table III*.

The results of the structure refinement show that C sC r03F and a -C sR e0 4 are indeed isostruc- tural. Therefore, the oxygen and fluorine atoms are statistically distributed on the 16 h site.

* Further details of the crystal structure determination can be obtained from the Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe GmbFl, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldsha- fen, by quoting the depository number CSD 59025.

Table II. Atomic positional parameters and displace­ment factors [A 2] for C sC r03F.

Fractional atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters a.Origin at centre (2/m)

Atom Site x/a y/b z/c u eq

Cs 4a 0 3/4 Cr 4b 0 1/4 O.F 16h 0 0.5139(6)

1/83/80.6877(3)

0.0298(1)0.0309(3)0.072(2)

Anisotropic displacement factors

Atom U n U 22 u 33 U 23

Cs 0.0320(1) U n Cr 0.0326(3) U „O.F 0.066(2) 0.076(2)U 12 = u 13 = 0

0.0254(2)0.0274(5)0.074(2)

000.044(2)

a U eq is defined as one third of the trace of the ortho- gonalized Ujj tensor.

Table III. Selected interatomic distances [A] and bond angles [°].

C r-O .F 1.633(4) (4x) O .F -C r-O .F 112.3(2) (2 x)O .F-O .F 2.643(5) (4x) O .F -C r-O .F 108.1(1) (4x)O .F-O .F 2.712(5) (2 x)

C s-O .F 3.111(4) (4x) C s-C r 4.0608(2)C s-O .F 3.372(3) (8 x) C s-C s, C r-C r 4.6254(3)

The structure of C sC r03F consists of isolated C r0 3F tetrahedra which are linked together by ce­sium ions. Cesium is twelvefold coordinated by ox­ygen and fluorine with an average C s -0 ,F dis­tance of 3.285(3) A. The C r -0 ,F distance of1.633(4) A is in agreement with the mean values of 1.648(5) A in K C r03F and 1.633(7) A in R b C r0 3F [1].

AcknowledgementsThe generous support given by the D eut­

schen Forschungsgemeinschaft (Graduiertenkol­leg “Complexity in Solids - Phonons, Electrons and Structures”) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. U. Klement for the collection of diffracto­meter data.

1414 Notizen

[1] W. Granier, S. Vilminot, J. D. Vidal, L. Cot, J. Fluo­rine Chem. 19, 123 (1991).

[2] J. A. A. Ketelaar, E. Wegerif, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays- Bas 58, 948 (1939).

[3] P Rögner, Dissertation, University of Regensburg (1993).

[4] K.-J. Range, P Rögner, A. M. Heyns, L. C. Prinsloo, Z. Naturforsch. 47 b, 1513 (1992).

[5] H. Beyer. A. Müller, B. Krebs, Z. Phys. Chem. 234. 423 (1967).

[6 ] E. Gebert, S. W. Peterson, A. H. Reis, E. H. A ppel­mann. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 43. 3085 (1981).

[7] P. Rögner, U. Schießl. K.-J. Range, Z. Naturforsch. 48 b, 235 (1993).

[8] P. Rögner, K.-J. Range, Z. Naturforsch. 48 b, 688 (1993).

[9] H. Seifert, Z. Kristallogr. 104, 385 (1942).[10] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-76. A program for the so­

lution of crystal structures. Univ. of Cambridge, England (1976).

[11] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-86 . A program for crystal structure determination, Universität Göttingen(1986).

[12] International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol. IV. The Kynoch Press, Birmingham (1974).

top related