eemmaass ddiiissssseerrrtttaaatttiiiooonnn e ggguuuiiidddee · emas dissertation guide version. 1.3...
Post on 21-Sep-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
EEEMMMAAASSS
DDDiiisssssseeerrrtttaaatttiiiooonnn GGGuuuiiidddeee Version 1.3
FFFaaacccuuullltttyyy ooofff AAAdddmmmiiinnniiissstttrrraaatttiiivvveee SSSccciiieeennnccceee &&& PPPooollliiicccyyy SSStttuuudddiiieeesss,,,
UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttiii TTTeeekkknnnooolllooogggiii MMMAAARRRAAA
444000444555000 SSShhhaaahhh AAAlllaaammm,,, SSSeeelllaaannngggooorrr
RRReeessseeeaaarrrccchhh PPPooowwweeerrreeeddd KKKnnnooowwwllleeedddgggeee
KKKnnnooowwwllleeedddgggeee PPPooowwweeerrreeeddd RRReeessseeeaaarrrccchhh
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
2 / 58
Table of Contents
The Dissertation ............................................................ 6
The Dissertation ............................................................ 6
The Research Title or Topic .......................................... 6
Selection of the Topics, Problems, Research Questions and Objectives ............................................................... 7
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................ 12
The problem statement ........................................ 12
The research questions ........................................ 13
The research objectives ....................................... 13
The significance of the study ................................ 14
The scope of study ............................................... 15
The limitations of the study ................................... 15
The definition of key terms ................................... 16
The organisation of the dissertation ..................... 16
Chapter 2: Literature review ..................................... 17
Chapter 3: Conceptual framework ........................... 20
Chapter 4: Research Methodology .......................... 23
Research Design .................................................. 23
Unit and Level of Analysis .................................... 24
Sample Size ......................................................... 25
Sampling Technique ............................................. 25
Measurement/Instrumentation .............................. 26
Data Collection ..................................................... 26
Data Analysis ....................................................... 27
Chapter 5: Results or findings .................................. 28
Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusion .................... 29
References ............................................................... 29
Appendices .............................................................. 30
Caveat ..................................................................... 30
Format requirements ................................................ 30
References: .............................................................. 31
THE DISSERTATION COVER ................................. 35
EXAMINATION CERTIFICATE ................................ 36
THE DECLARATION ............................................... 37
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
3 / 58
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT........................................... 38
THE ABSTRACT ...................................................... 39
CONTENTS PAGE FOR DISSERTATION .............. 42
LIST OF TABLES and CHARTS .............................. 44
LIST OF FIGURES OR CHARTS ............................ 45
CITING REFERENCES IN THE TEXT .................... 46
COMPLETE REFERENCE FORMAT ...................... 48
TABLES ................................................................... 50
CHARTS/FIGURES ................................................. 51
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EMAS RESEARCH PRESENTATION (30%)........................................... 52
PERSONAL NOTES ................................................ 56
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
4 / 58
Copyright The Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies retain all rights to this guide. No duplication or reproduction in any form is allowed without the expressed permission of the Dean.
Acknowledgement The contributions of Associate Professor Rozalli Hashim, Associate Professor Dr Nooraini Mohamed Ismail and Associate Professor Dr Jasmine Ahmad in reviewing this handbook is gratefully acknowledged.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
5 / 58
GGGuuuiiidddeee tttooo ttthhheee
DDDiiisssssseeerrrtttaaatttiiiooonnn:::
TTThhheee SSStttrrruuuccctttuuurrreee,,,
SSStttaaannndddaaarrrdddsss &&& IIIssssssuuueeesss
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
6 / 58
The Dissertation
What is a dissertation? It is an original and
independent research work by a student under the
supervision of a staff of the faculty or other
assigned persons (who have the academic
credentials) which meets the general requirements
in a given discipline of study. It is not a survey
but a serious study of a problem with adequate
conceptualisation of the proposed research.
The dissertation should be about 25,000-30,000
words (approx. 100 pages) long and written in
English following all the requirements stated in
this dissertation. The format and general rules on
the dissertation are provided in this dissertation
guide.
The Research Title or Topic
The candidate is expected to select a researchable
problem or issue that is of interest to him or her or
required under the terms of funding by the
sponsor. The final research title will be
determined in consultation with the supervisor
and through the defense of the proposal process.
This title will indicate the nature and scope of the
proposed research.
The research should display some originality. The
problem or issues dealt with must be new or
examined in a new context or uses a new
methodology or adopts a new perspective or a
combination of the foregoing. Pure replication of
Replication research is not encouraged. Replication merely adds to testing of an existing model.
Look around you and your workplace for problems and issues. Many ordinary issues can be a subject of rigorous study. View things with a critical eye. The research can be inductive or deductive; qualitative or quantitative or a mix of both. The methodology must serve the research questions and objectives. Do not be dogmatic about methodology. Mismatch between research design and research objective is a major flaw which may seriously devalue a dissertation.
Masters level dissertation research often involves broader analysis of the phenomenon. The derivation of the conceptual framework is far less rigorous than a PhD dissertation. The research must not be merely descriptive. It must involve analysis of interrelationships between important variables.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
7 / 58
past research is NOT ENCOURAGED but may
be allowed under special circumstances. The
candidates are expected to examine issues and
problems that are yet undefined, unresearched or
underresearched to add to the store of knowledge
in the field of administrative science and policy
studies. The research, whether exploratory or
confirmatory, must make a significant
contribution to the discipline.
The research can be quantitative or qualitative
(deductive or inductive) in nature. Although there
will be variations to the structure of the
dissertation, the general structure is substantially
the same.
The candidates are strongly advised to choose
from issues and topics that are examined in the
various courses in this programme. This will
ensure that students have some understanding of
the topic chosen. The candidates should also think
of their employers or organisation in selecting the
topics for their dissertation. Researching an issue
of importance to the employer will add value to
the dissertation and also signal to your employers
the value of the programme and you to the
organisation.
Selection of the Topics, Problems, Research Questions and Objectives
Many candidates have very preliminary or
tentative topics and issues in mind when
embarking on the dissertation They expect the
Given the vast store of knowledge on almost all areas of study, it will appear that everything of importance has been researched. But examine these premises critically and you will begin see endless questions about everything that we presume to be known. The approach to research i.e. quantitative or qualitative should be guided by your ability, training and preference for the methodology. The topic, problem, objectives and questions must be developed through critical and reasonably broad reading of related literature. Well founded proposals face less risks of repudiation by fieldwork and later by the examiners. Do not be driven by an important article or two. Propositions must be based on the basis of broader literature. Personal beliefs and biases may provide the motivation an inquiry but should not be the rationale for the proposed study.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
8 / 58
supervisors to help them to focus and to clarify
the research questions. The lack of focus is often
the result of lack of sufficiently broad reading in
the relevant or cognate areas.
Candidates should avoid being attracted to or
driven by an article or two. Wider reading and
interviews will establish whether the initial ideas
are important, major, central and current issues in
the area. When research is directed towards
important new issues, the dissertation will be
better accepted by the reviewers.
Therefore, some quick scanning or reading about
the topic is always helpful in the choice of topic.
Your supervisor may offer some guidance on the
topic.
One other avenue for research issues and topics is
to inquire about the lecturer’s research
programme/s. Candidates should inquire about
their lecturer’s research programme. Candidates
can seek to carry out some aspects of the
lecturer’s research programme. Often funding
may be available from the lecturer concerned.
Where to look for Research Ideas?
1. Journals
Journal articles whether conceptual, theoretical or
empirical usually will make suggestions for future
research. This is a good source to pick up on.
Beyond this, the very title of articles can spark
new and useful research ideas as it can widen the
knowledge horizon and trigger new questions.
Literature review based proposals may be distorted and render the proposal dangerously weak. It is a good practice to carry out selected preliminary interviews on the research issues to provide additional checks on the validity of the proposal and its assumptions. The central statements and assumptions of the proposals must be questioned, not accepted at face value.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
9 / 58
2. Workplace issues & challenges
As working students, you will be knowledgeable
about the issues at your workplace. It may, for
instance, touch on productivity, empowerment,
safety, quality, leadership, teamwork, work and
life balance etc.
3. Personal curiosity
As students, executives, parents etc. you have
questions that may be best settled through a
careful study. For example, are female drivers
more reckless in ther driving than male drivers? A
carefully designed study can offer scientific
examination of this claim. Is a participatory style
of management/leadership as effective as it is
believed to be? There are many propositions that
masquerade as principles and statements of fact.
Management is replete with these kinds of facts.
Question them and challenge them but do it
systematically and scientifically
4. Lecturer’s research programme
The lecturer’s normally have one or more research
programmes. These research programmes usually
have a number of specific research questions or
issues. For example, someone having e-
government as a research programme may want to
research how intranets affect productivity of
public employees, how e-services are viewed
internally by the agencies – pain or pleasure, how
information technology is used for inter-agency
interaction, how public participation is handled by
public managers, the promise of m-services etc.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
10 / 58
Candidates can seek to research one of these
issues.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
11 / 58
The Structure of the Dissertation
The Preface Section
This section includes the cover page, title page,
examination certificate, the abstract, the
acknowledgement, the table content, list of tables,
figures and appendices. The order of appearance
of these elements are provided in this dissertation
guide.
See page 35 onwards for specific information.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
12 / 58
Chapter 1: Introduction
The introductory chapter provides an overview of
the topic or subject under investigation. This
should be adequate and not extensive as this is
merely to set the stage for the presentation of the
problem to be examined. The candidate should
exercise good judgement in selecting and
organizing this section. A good introduction lays
the grounds for the discussion or description of
the problem to be studied. There should be a
logical and natural flow to the problem.
The problem statement
The candidate is required to concisely present the
problem that is the subject matter of his or her
dissertation. A problem is a condition or state that
is not satisfactory. This condition could related to
lack of knowledge of what is characterised as a
problem (conceptual clarity) or poor causal or
correlational evidence to support a policy/belief
(empirical evidence) or lack of adequate
knowledge of the relationships between variables
(theory) etc. The candidate must strive to present
the problem as compactly or concisely as possible
with key issues or aspects included and
highlighted. The writing must be focused on the
problem that the dissertation is intended to
examine. Extensive or elaborate problem
statements tend to become unfocused and begin to
raise many symptoms in the guise of the problem.
The ability to state the problem concisely and
Introductory chapters should not be too long. The introduction must lead readers to the problem. Clear, concise and compact introductions are more effective than wordy, lengthy and rambling pieces that are bulky. Research is a purposive activity. Problem resolution is at the heart of all research. Therefore the problem must be stated clearly and concisely. The research problem must be clearly outlined with suitable evidence. Not all problems are worthy of research at this level. You should be able to state and restate the problem without confusion. This is often the test clarity problem statement.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
13 / 58
compactly is a mark of good understanding of the
problem on the part of the candidate.
Is the problem defined within a perspective or
paradigm? It is good to explore and state clearly if
the problem is examined from a particular
standpoint. Most problems exist within an implicit
perspective or paradigm but it is rarely made
explicit. This level of problem definition speaks
of depth and rigor in the work. You should seek to
define the problem and also state the conceptual
lens i.e. perspective or paradigm used to establish
the problem.
The research questions
K. Ohmae (1982)1 provides a lucid account of
how the questions determine the scope of
intellectual analysis. The candidate should state
key research questions that are related to the
problem described in the foregoing section. These
questions should be broad, basic, substantial and
serious. The research in seeking to answer these
questions will make significant contribution to the
discipline.
The research objectives
The research objectives are the key drivers of the
research in that they provide specific direction,
guidance and a basis for evaluation. These
objectives should be clear and specific; including
1 Ohmae, K. (1982). The Mind of the Strategist. Chapter 1
Research questions should be stated. These questions should be central, important and searching questions. These questions will indicate the level, extent or depth of analysis required for answers. These questions are generally few in number. The research objectives should be linked to and driven by the research questions. They are specific and employ these verbs; examine, determine, ascertain, explore, compare etc. Some contribution to the field of study must be visible. In this section the candidates must outline how the study is significant. Significance of the study can be examined from a theoretical, policy, managerial or practical standpoint.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
14 / 58
in their statement the key concepts or constructs
of interest to the study.
The significance of the study
Under this section, the candidate must explain the
utility of the study and possible findings to other
parties. For instance, the candidate can state the
significance of the research from a public policy
standpoint. The research may assist in developing
better understanding of a problem which in turn
may benefit policy formulation and programme
development. Remember, understanding a
problem in all its complexities helps to direct
attention and solution to its amelioration. The
candidate can also explore the organisational or
managerial significance of the study. Many
studies are aimed at helping managers to be more
effective. How the study can help them should be
outlined. The study can also be examined from an
individual standpoint. The study may help self-
development of individuals. Lastly, the
significance can also be examined from the
theoretical, conceptual or disciplinary standpoint.
The study could test theories or develop theories
to explain a phenomenon of interest. New
explanatory, moderating or mediating factors tend
to add realism to otherwise simplistic models. It
also helps to contextualize models and theories. In
social science unlike natural sciences, there is
rarely a universally applicable theory. There is
always some contextual elements that makes it
useful for explaining a phenomenon.
It is important to identify a void in the research within the discipline. But not all voids are important to be researched. Just because there are no researches on a question does not automatically mean it must be studied.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
15 / 58
All or some of the above types of significance
could be relevant to a study and should be
outlined under this section. Do not be extremely
modest and shy away from stating the importance
of your study. If you feel that your study is not
that important, probably nobody else will. But at
the same time be realistic about claims of
significance. The claims can be easily assessed
against the outcome or product – the dissertation.
State what you can live with.
The scope of study
The candidate must outline the decisions about the
limits of the study in terms of the population and
sample. The issues pertaining to scope are directly
related to the value and generalisability of the
study and should be seriously considered and
stated. Title of the dissertation often will indicate
the scope of the study.
The limitations of the study
The candidate should state the decisions with
respect to research design, sample, sample size,
sampling technique, measurement and data
collection that may affect the generalisability of
the study. It is necessary and always a good policy
to acknowledge the limitation of the study in a
forthright way. Do not list all the personal
difficulties that you faced when carrying out the
study as very is the case.
The limitations of the study are those that emanate from the conceptual and methodological choices made i.e. population, sample, sampling technique, conceptual framework and analysis. Personal limitations are not required.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
16 / 58
The definition of key terms
It is customary to state and define the meaning of
key terms/concepts for the benefit of the readers.
Here, the candidate should state the definition of
key terms or terminologies without going into a
discussion of the merits of the meaning. If a term
is common knowledge then it need not be defined.
For example, gender, age, height etc.
The organisation of the dissertation
Even though there is a generally accepted
structure to a thesis, there are legitimate
differences in the structure and sequencing of
chapters. It is a good practice to outline here how
the dissertation chapters will be organised and
what each chapter will entail.
Provide a dictionary type explanation of the key terms or concepts used in the study. This definition does not constitute the definition and explanation of the variables study. A more extensive explanation will be provided in the Conceptual Framework chapter.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
17 / 58
Chapter 2: Literature review
This chapter represents the candidate’s review of
the related or relevant literature in the field of
study or other proximate fields. The candidate
should show his/her command of the field or topic
through the selection and review of the materials.
The materials should generally be of recent origin
(in the last 5 years) but historically important
works should not be overlooked.
The review should be organised under appropriate
sub-headings to facilitate better understanding of
the materials reviewed. It is a good practice to
tabulate the major or indicative works along the
concepts or issues that are the focus of the study.
This tabulation can act as a summary of the
literature and also to bring out key observations
that the study is intended to address.
The conventions and rules of recognizing sources
should be scrupulously followed to avoid charges
of plagiarism or academic dishonesty. These
charges are extremely serious and can lead to a
fail grade or expulsion of the candidate from the
programme in cases of blatant violation. So
always be truthful and honest. The house rules on
the citations must be followed to avoid tedious
reworking later on (see the most recent edition of
the ‘Guidelines on the EMAS Dissertation
Format’). All dissertations submitted will be
checked by the faculty using the Turnitin
software.
All relevant concepts involved in the study must form the general perimeter of the review. Specific literature is better than general one. The literature should also extend to other disciplines where the same concept is studied. Literature review is not a summary of the articles and other materials read. The candidate must review it i.e. what the research objectives, the theoretical framework are or perspective adopted, the sample, the methodology findings and what is the value of the study in relation to the issue under examination. Most of the literature should come from leading or flagship journals. When the topic is a local one, local journals must also be searched for relevant materials.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
18 / 58
The first thing to do when preparing for a
literature review is to search for the relevant
literature by using one or more online databases.
These databases are available through UiTM’s
library. When searching for materials always
think of the possible terms or labels under which
these materials may be cited in the databases. Use
the abstracts to screen out irrelevant materials and
develop a good bibliography of references. If you
are not sure how this can be done within the
online databases, please use the help function or
ask the librarian for help.
The next step will be to download (digitally or in
print) and read these materials very closely and
critically. When reading these materials, pay
particular attention to the problem, the objective,
the theory, the framework, the method, the
measure, the findings and the value of the
findings.
Write your review of the article in the form of a
paragraph. Who researched this, what is the
objective, what did they establish, how did they
establish it, what do the findings mean to the
understanding of the concept or the relationship
between concepts, were the findings convergent
or divergent with the rest and why are some of the
elements that go into a good review. A bad review
is one that merely states the article read in a
summary form. This could be easily done with the
aid of the abstract. It creates a literature review
which nothing more than a mere collection of
abstracts. This will definitely invite comments
from your examiners.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
19 / 58
Make sure you have the reference details for later
use. When the paragraphs representing the
reviews of various materials are eventually place
together, you can see a picture of the literature
emerging. These disconnected reviews must be
rewritten and organised under sub-headings if
necessary to form a well written and organised
review. You should also try to tabulate the
reviews in terms of the key objectives of this
research as a summary of the literature.
The process of reviewing and developing the
literature goes on until the study is completed.
New materials coming in the journal must be
included where relevant. This will ensure that you
are up to date with your readings.
---------------------------
Note: There is special software that allows you to
capture all references details. Any use of the
author’s (the detail of the materials has been
entered into the Endnote programme) name in the
dissertation automatically cause the relevant
citation to be added as endnote.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
20 / 58
Chapter 3: Conceptual framework
The conceptual framework chapter presents the
concepts and constructs that the study examines
and their inter-relationships. The definition and
the relationship between the concepts/constructs
must be clearly and persuasively stated. Where
the conceptual framework is firmly established
and informed by strong underpinning theories,
hypotheses (directional or non-directional) can be
stated for empirical testing.
It is important to locate your conceptual
framework within the framework of a perspective
or theory or multiple perspectives or theories.
This reveals the larger assumptive framework or
perspective or paradigm within which the
proposed conceptual framework becomes valid or
defensible or meaningful.
This section is highly important to studies which
are deductive in nature. A theory or model is
developed and tested as part of the research. More
inductive and often qualitative approaches may
not require a strong or clear framework in the
beginning. One may be developed at the end of
the study. But many qualitative scientists argue
that a conceptual framework is always needed to
guide a qualitative study as well. Specific
guidance on this will be provided by the
supervisor.
The candidate must make clear the theoretical, conceptual or research framework used. Both deductive and inductive studies require the framework to be made clear. The candidate should be asked to diagram this framework as it articulates pictorially what the research is all about. In doing this, the candidate must identify the constructs, define them, and explain their interconnections by using the literature. The nature of variables should also be made clear. This chapter should also state the hypotheses that will be tested in the study. Even for more qualitative studies, the propositions can be put forth which can be confirmed or disconfirm through the data collection and analysis. The candidate should be expected to be clear about and justify the nature of moderating and intervening variables.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
21 / 58
Fig. 1: A Deductive Model of HRM-Organisational
Outcomes
In developing the conceptual framework the
candidate must select the literature that forms the
basis of the concept and the inter-connections to
establish the value and validity of the framework
adopted. In the conceptual framework (CF) you
must first establish the conceptual definition of the
concepts included in the CF. These definitions will
become the basis of the operational definition in
Chapter 4 when dealing with issues of
measurement of the concept.
The second task will be to use the literature
reviewed to show that all the connections (arrows
in the CF diagram) are supported by evidence
culled from the literature, theories and logic.
Invariably, you will be required to determine the
role of the various concepts/variables in the CF.
i.e. independent (exogenous) variable, dependent
(endogenous/outcome/criterion) variable and
moderating variable or intervening (mediating)
variable. The evidence from literature must
support the various role of a particular variable.
HR Systems
HR Policies
HR Practices
Job
satisfactionQuality
Organisational
Commitment
Competency
Productivity
Innovation
Sales
Profit per
employee
Market share
HR Practices Personnel
Outcomes
Organisational
Outcomes
Financial
Outcomes
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
22 / 58
In developing the CF, the candidate must always
be mindful of the objective of the study. The CF is
the conceptual design to reach the objectives of the
study. Hence, the CF must serve the objective of
the study. But the CF shows how the study is
delimited by the concepts used and the extent of
inter-relationships examined. The CF demarcates
the boundaries of the study i.e. what is included
and what is not.
It may appear that the literature review is being
duplicated. Actually, the purpose of this section is
not the same as literature review. In this section,
you only use selected literature from the collection
reviewed. Secondly, the purpose is not to examine
the details of the study but to use it as a
scaffolding to construct your conceptual
framework. You are using the literature as
evidence of the connections that you have
outlined.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
23 / 58
Chapter 4: Research Methodology
This chapter is extremely important as it outlines
the operational aspects of the research. This
chapter explains the “how” question while the
earlier chapters focus on the “what and why”
questions. This involves the design, fieldwork,
measurement, observation, data collection
analysis and the like. Careful attention must be
paid to the issues of research design, sampling
technique, sample, measurement, data collection
and analysis in relation to the objectives of the
study.
The choices made by the candidate must be
explained and justified. Arbitrary decisions are
not scientific, scholarly or rigorous and therefore
invite comments. Candidate should pay particular
attention to issues of validity, reliability, response
bias, triangulation etc.
Research Design
The candidate must explain clearly the research
design adopted and the reasons for this decision.
The research design and approach must be one
that will serve the research questions and
objectives. There is no such thing as the best
research design. There are only suitable or
appropriate designs. In making the choices, the
candidate must examine the designs used in
earlier studies and can contribute by utilising
different designs to demonstrate absence of design
bias or adopt similar designs to maintain
Although the research design is fashioned by the many methodological choices made by the candidate, all these choices must be within the confines of a general design adopted for the study. The design itself can constitute a new contribution to the field if it provides a more rigorous test than has been the case in the field.
This is the operational planning of the research. Two criteria must be kept in mind namely, internal and external validity. The former deals with validity of the relationships posited. The latter deals with generalisability of the results (see Kerlinger, 1984).
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
24 / 58
comparability. Most studies tend to employ a
cross-sectional or correlational design. These
designs can only test the existence of co-variation
between variables which is the first criterion of
causality. These designs cannot demonstrate time
order or temporal sequence of changes in the
antecedent and outcome variables. No statistical
technique can provide proof of causality. This can
only be achieved by research design.
Experimental, quasi-experimental and factorial
designs offer many unique advantages which are
not exploited by management researchers.
Unit and Level of Analysis
The unit of analysis must be stated very clearly.
Normally, there is no confusion about the unit but
occasionally there is confusion about the unit of
analysis. The unit of analysis refers to the unit to
which the findings are applicable to. The units of
analysis could be humans (managers,
technologist, K-workers etc.) or non-humans
(automobiles, pets, houses etc.).
In making the determination of the unit of
analysis, the appropriateness of the concept for
the level/unit of analysis must be carefully
considered. Some concepts are only amenable to
certain levels of analysis. Any attempt to extend
the level of analysis beyond its original meaning
must be extensively discussed and explained in
both the literature review section (looking studies
that have use the concept the same way as in the
The candidate is required to be clear about the level or unit of analysis. Is it human or non-human? What level of analysis is carried out i.e. individual, groups, community or national? Beware that some concepts are by definition only appropriate for certain levels of analysis. For example the concept of E-procurement is applicable for an organisation unit. E-buying or E-purchase refers to buying or consumption units.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
25 / 58
study) and more importantly in the conceptual
framework chapter..
Sample Size
The sample size planned for or needed for the
study must be established in a scientific manner.
The larger the sample size relative to the
population, the lower the sampling error. Hence,
the findings can be generalised to the population
less risks of error. Generally, the sampling error
method, power analysis and other rule of thumb
based on data analytic technique are used to
determine the sample size needed. Complex
multivariate techniques would require a relatively
larger sample size than simpler techniques (see
Tabachnick & Fidel, 2002; Hair et al. 2006;
Segaran, U., 2004)
In the case of qualitative studies, the sample size
may range from 1 to a few. The sample sizes must
also be explained. See Yin, R (1990) and Miles &
Huberman (1994) for a closer examination of this
question.
Sampling Technique
The procedure used to select the required sample
has important implications for the external
validity of the study. The population, the sampling
frame and the sampling technique must be
explicitly stated.
It is always a good practice to use more than one basis to establish the minimum sample size for a study. Generally, sampling error should be used to establish the minimum sample size and power analysis used to determine the maximum sample size. The planned sample size must also take into account how the data will be collected and the response rate typically associated with the method. While random sampling is preferred, appropriate technique must be adopted after considering the purpose of the study. The candidate must provide for ways to test for response or non-response bias and means to generate high response rate.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
26 / 58
Measurement/Instrumentation
This is a key aspect of the research method
chapter. Every variable involved in the study must
be explained in this section. The empirical
indicators of the construct must be stated clearly.
The validity and reliability of the instrument (if it
is an established measure) must be stated by
referring to relevant literature. The scaling of the
response and the type of data generated should be
made crystal clear for data analysis purposes. Any
adaptation to the original measures must be
clearly explained and the changes outlined.
Where the measurement is developed specifically
for the study, the procedures involved in its pre-
testing and evidence of its reliability and validity
must be demonstrated. For help in developing
new measure see Churchill (1979) or Dunn et al.
(2000)
Pilot study MUST be carried out before the full
survey to ascertain the reliability, validity and also
the clarity of the instruments used in the study.
Data Collection
This section should state how the data was
collected from the respondents. Interviews, mailed
questionnaires, observations or a combination
may be used to reach and obtain the data from the
respondents. Issues including when the research
was done and what season, day or month are
pertinent factors to state. It is always a good
The instruments must be assessed for the reliability and validity (if they are existing instruments). Candidates proposing to develop new instrument must pre-test the measures for reliability and validity. Face validity is not enough for masters and Phd thesis. Construct, content, predictive and nomological validity are more acceptable forms of validity (see Campbell & Stanley, 1979). For scale development procedures see Peterson (1982) and Dunn et al. (2002). All candidates must carry out pilot study to refine the instruments even if they are well established ones. Where the questionnaire is in one language and it is administered in another, the procedure of translation and back translation must be carried out. A template for questionnaire development and also for addressing the data analysis is attached for use by the supervisors to see the decisions clearly and identify possible problems.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
27 / 58
practice to explain the data collection procedures
in detail rather than a summary of the processes.
The response and non-response bias i.e. who
responded and who did not and are there
significant differences as a result, should be
planned and tested to provide evidence of the
presence or absence of such bias.
Data Analysis
This section should make clear how the data was
analysed to aid in the determination of the
research objectives. In quantitative studies, the
statistics to be used must be stated and also what
tests were carried out to test the hypotheses.
In the case of qualitative studies, the tools and
method involved in analysis of the textual data
must be stated. The candidate must use any of the
computer programmes available (e.g InVivo,
HyperQual etc) to process that data.
.
The specific tools for the analysis of the data to meet the research objectives must be clearly outlined. In the case of qualitative data analysis, computer programmes that can aid in data analysis must be used for analysis (e.g. Nudist, Invivo, HyperQual etc.). Candidates are expected to be well versed with the basics of qualitative data analysis. Miles and Huberman (1994), Analysing Qualitative Data is a good introductory text for beginners. More focused texts on the specific type of qualitative method used is required to become comfortable in the analysis.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
28 / 58
Chapter 5: Results or findings
This chapter provides the results of the study. It is
customary to start with the profile of the
respondents followed by a profile of the data and
assumptions for data analysis.
Following the profile, this chapter must show
evidence of testing the goodness of measures.
This is typically done via a exploratory and/or
confirmatory factor analysis and a reliability test.
Once the items and their factors (variables) are
confirmed, assumptions testing must be done on
the variables computed from the multiple items. A
description of the variables via means, standard
deviation and inter-variable correlations is in
order. Following this the tests are determined by
the objectives and hypotheses.
The results are generally more effectively
organised by the objectives and hypotheses testing
carried out. There should be a summary at the end
of the chapter to recapitulate the findings for
effective closure. Do not discuss the findings at
this stage. You can do that in the following
discussion chapter.
Where additional data is available for analysis,
Post Hoc analysis can be carried out. But care
must be taken to ensure that it does not distract
from the focus of the dissertation. This section
must be clearly labeled and it should be just
processing that same data using a different
technique.
The candidate must provide a profile of the sample involved in the study. Where the multivariate statistical analysis is used, all the assumptions must be tested and the summary include in the chapter with the details provided as appendix. The goodness of measures must be tested. Studies involving multiple constructs and using multiple items scales must provide evidence of discriminant and convergent validity (correlations, factor analysis). For those adopting qualitative approaches, reliability and validity must be established following the methods and standards established within these approaches (see Miles & Huberman, 1994). Reliability of measures must be established and any inductive deletion of items must be explicitly stated.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
29 / 58
Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusion
This chapter is immensely important but often
poorly developed. There is a tendency to rush
through this section in the haste to complete the
dissertation. Time and patience is needed to
develop an effective discussion of the results.
It is customary to start with a brief restatement of
the findings. The candidate must consider each of
the key findings in the context of the literature of
the field. The implications and meaning of the
results must be examined thoroughly and with
some speculative suggestions and pointers if need
be. Consistencies and inconsistencies must be
examined and reasons proffered even if it is a
speculative one. Specifically, what the findings
mean for the theory and practice in the field must
be explored. It is also customary to point to
possible future research directions that will further
illuminate the issues under examination. Do not
forget to admit the limitations of the study.
An overall conclusion provides a final closure to
the dissertation. It is vital that the conclusion be
carefully written to capture the essence of the
research without exaggeration. It is also
customary to state any qualifications that the
reader must be made aware.
References
All the materials and references that have been
cited in the text of the dissertation must be
Ideally, this chapter should restate the main findings before proceeding with the discussion. The implications and meaning of each finding should be discussed at length taking into account the position of the literature. The issues may be the findings, the method, the measures or the sample. It is also customary to suggest future areas of research to answer questions raised in this study. Only the materials referred in the dissertation should be included in the references.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
30 / 58
correctly and fully stated following the house
reference rules and conventions. These must be
alphabetically arranged for easy reference.
Appendices
All documents that are part of the study but may
break the organisation and focus of the
dissertation should be sequentially labeled and
cited in the dissertation for readers and reviewers
to obtain further information. Care must be
exercised to ensure that only needed materials are
appended and not all related materials. Discretion
is needed. Please follow the advice of your
supervisors.
Caveat
The foregoing explanation of the structure of the
dissertation is based on general and conventional
practice. The dissertation structure is not carved in
stone, and hence, is changeable. Vastly different
research methodologies may practice different
organisation and structures. There may be good
reasons to deviate from the standard. Follow the
advice of your supervisor and the Coordinator.
Format requirements
The candidate is required to follow the rules and
requirements on format of the thesis to avoid
undue delay and tedious reworking later on. Do
not assume knowledge of the format. Every
Documents that are related to the study but do not belong in the text of the dissertation should be included as appendices. Typically questionnaire and statistical information will be made available. While a general structure is outlined here, there are legitimate variations to the dissertation. However, in the interest of a common approach, all dissertations must substantially follow the structure outlined here. All candidates are advised to read, understand and follow the format requirements from the outset. This will save time and obviate tedious and sometimes annoying reformatting work.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
31 / 58
faculty has its house rules which may be
idiosyncratic. It is always a good practice to read
and be familiar with the format and follow them
from the outset rather than leaving them to the
later stages. Please see this volume for format.
References:
1. FSPPP, (2006). EMA 731 (Dissertation) Syllabus.
2. Glathorn, A.A. & Joyner, R.L. (1999). Writing the Winning
Dissertation – A Step-by Step Guide. 2nd
Ed.
3. Davis, G.B. (1997). Writing the Dissertation. A Systematic
Approach. Barron Educational Series. Inc. NY.
4. Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes
a Day: A Guide to Starting, Revising and Finishing Your
Dissertation. Henry Holt & Co. NY.
5. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R (2010). Business Research Methods:
A Skill Building Approach. Prentice-Hall. Singapore.
6. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, M (1994). Qualitative Data
Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd
Ed. Sage Publications.
Thousand Oaks, London.
7. Hazman Shah Abdullah (2010). Research Method Handbook
for Administrative Science. FSPPP, Mimeographed.
.
Written by
Prof Hj. Hazman Shah Abdullah
Faculty of Administrative Science &
Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA
Shah Alam, Selangor. D.E.
©FSPPP, 2006 (revised July 2010)
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
32 / 58
DDDiiisssssseeerrrtttaaatttiiiooonnn
FFFooorrrmmmaaattt aaannnddd
RRReeeqqquuuiiirrreeemmmeeennntttsss
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
33 / 58
A. DISSERTATION SUBMISSION The students must submit 3 comb bound copies of their dissertation following the format herein stated for review and presentation. The supervisor/Chairperson of the panel of Supervisors must signed the “Clearance for Submission Form” before the reports are accepted for evaluation and copies of the “Clearance for Submission” placed in all the copies of the dissertation. After the presentation and having made the required changes and amendments and so confirmed by the supervisor, the candidate shall submit 2 hardcover bound copies with gold embossed title, name, faculty and date (as in Appendix A). A CD containing the soft copy of the dissertation including the datafile in SPSS must also be submitted. Students should make extra copies for their reference or keeping.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
34 / 58
B. DISSERTATION FORMAT
The research report to be submitted must adhere to the requirements set in the following sections. Each of the requirements are stated as clearly as possible and illustrated in the appendices cited. 1. Paper Size
1.1 A4, 80 gm white paper.
2. The Language 2.1 The report must be in grammatically correct British
English.
3. The Cover of the Report 3.1. Title of the study 3.2. The name of the candidate & matriculation no. 3.3. 16 point Arial font 3.4. See Appendix A
4. The Inside Page
4.1. Examination Certificate B 4.2. The Declaration C
5. The Acknowledgement
5.1. Acknowledge parties who have helped. 5.2. See Appendix D
6. Abstract
6.1. See Appendix E
7. The Contents Page
7.1. See Appendix F
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
35 / 58
APPENDIX A
THE DISSERTATION COVER
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE &
POLICY STUDIES
CLIENT CHARTER: A STUDY OF THE PERCEPTION OF THE USERS AND THE STAFF IN THE
REGISTRAR'S OFFICE.
ALI BIN AHMAD 200398979
NOVEMBER 2003
All text in 16 point Arial font CAPS
3 lines, single spaced
3 lines single spaced
5 lines, single spaced
12 lines, single spaced
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
36 / 58
APPENDIX B
EXAMINATION CERTIFICATE
We, the undersigned, have examined this dissertation and find it to meet the requirements set and standard
expected.
…………………………………………….. Main Supervisor
[ type name of supervisor]
………………………………………………… Co-Supervisor
[ type name of Co-Supervisor]
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
37 / 58
APPENDIX C
THE DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is original and my own except those duly identified and acknowledged. If I am later found to have committed plagiarism or acts of academic dishonesty, action can be taken in accordance with Universiti Teknologi MARA’s rules and academic regulations. Signed. ----------------------------------------- [type Name here] [type Matriculation no. here]
[all text in 12 point font ]
5 lines down (single space)
3 lines from the last line, single spaced
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
38 / 58
APPENDIX D
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Completing this research was a challenging project for us. However, fortunately we had the help of many parties that made this project less difficult. Dr Hope kept us motivated and on course during all those moments things were not going as planned. We were delayed and the questionnaires were not returned as expected. We thank him from the bottom of our hearts for being there in our moments of need.. Our Supervisor, Ms. Terrible deserves a special mention here. She was insistent on the meetings and deadlines which we did not quite appreciate then. But looking back, her toughness made us work harder and for that we will always be grateful. I would like to thank our lecturer who taught us many things about research but did not tell us that it would be this difficult. We learn a valuable lesson about research in action. Things do not go as expected or planned. You have to make adjustments but these adjustments must be justified or qualified. We would like thank God Almighty without whose blessing we will not have successfully completed this study. Abdul Razak Executive Masters of Administrative Science Faculty of Administrative Science & Policy Studies
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
39 / 58
APPENDIX E
THE ABSTRACT
Abstract
New public management has brought many private sector concepts to the public sector. The client charters were introduced in Malaysia in 1993 to make the public agencies accountable to the clients by stating openly the type and standards of the service to be provided and recovery for failure. The study examines the impact of client charters (CC) actively encouraged as a device to promote customer orientation in government departments from the standpoint employees and users. A random sample of 200 users and all the staff in UiTM's Registrar's office were interviewed on two major issues. The users' level of awareness and importance attached to CC were examined. On the staff side, their extent of involvement and the importance of CC in making the department customer oriented were examined. Not surprisingly, the users although generally aware of the CC, did not accord it high importance. The users appear to be still unconvinced of the department's orientation. The extent of staff participation was low with some reporting very high level of participation supporting the claim that CCs were the work of a few staff. The study does not provide strong evidence of the efficacy of CC in promoting the department's customer orientation. CCs have not gained the kind of stature they should have.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
40 / 58
Good abstracts do the following 1. Abstracts are written to allow readers to have a brief but
accurate insight into the study and its findings. Further reading will depend on the readers’ interest in the subject matter and findings.
2. The abstract should be a short but accurate write up of the study, the objectives, method, findings and conclusion. Usually the abstract is no longer than a page, single spaced.
3. The abstract must introduce the topic of study, state the main objectives of the study, the method and the sample and the main findings.
4. Finally, in one or two lines state the conclusion of the study.
Here is a sample of a structured abstract from http://www.asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com/instructions.html
Sustainability Measurements for Non-Profit Organizations in the Health Sector JH Mueller, PR Tubbs and FM Morganthau Department of Strategic Management and Leadership Waikato Management School Hamilton ‚ New Zealand INTRODUCTION. We report a review of sustainability practices in not-for-profit, government-sponsored organizations in New Zealand. Funding shortages have been reported as drivers behind the development of sustainability practices at these entities. This study attempts to identify which sustainability characteristics can be found in this population and how effectively they are deployed. METHOD. Web-based surveys were employed to access a large population of organizations in the North Island of New Zealand. In-depth interviews were then conducted, followed by structured reviews of the firm, its management and all key staff. The findings were shared with the management, for additional feedback. ANALYSIS. We carried out quantitative and qualitative analyses on
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
41 / 58
this data. We used standard SPSS statistical measures for the quantitative portion and developed a structured table/matrix system to categorize qualitative information. RESULTS. Sustainability is a highly non-specific term and applied differently in different organizations worldwide. There is considerable attraction to the notion of "remaining in business forever", but we found that the approach to sustainability in practice varied greatly throughout the researched population. CONCLUSION. A management focus on sustainability as part of the business tactics increases the awareness of the staff as to long-term operating success. Organizations which can demonstrate sustainability awareness and application, receive more funding from donors than those firms which do not.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
42 / 58
APPENDIX F
CONTENTS PAGE FOR DISSERTATION
CONTENTS
1. Chapter I:
1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Problem Statement 2 1.3. Research Objectives 3 1.4. Scope of Research 4 1.5. Significance of the Study 5 1.6. Key terms/concepts 7
2. Chapter II: Literature Review & Conceptual
2.1. Framework 8 2.2. Customer Orientation 9 2.3. Customer Orientation in Government 10 2.4. Client Charter 11 2.5. Evaluation of Client Charter 12 2.6. Conceptual Framework 13 2.7. Summary 16
3. Chapter III: Research Method
3.1. Research Design 17 3.2. Unit of analysis 18 3.3. Sample size 19 3.4. Sampling Technique 20 3.5. Measurement/Instrumentation 21 3.6. Data Collection 27 3.7. Data analysis 29
4. Chapter IV: Findings
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
43 / 58
4.1. Respondents’ profile 30 4.2. Objective 1 32 4.3. (and all other objectives as appropriate) 4.4. Summary 40
5. Chapter V: Discussion & Conclusion
5.1. Main findings revisited 45 5.2. Implications for the practice 55 5.3. Conclusion 60 5.4. Qualification/caveat 65
References 70 Appendixes (if any) 75 List of Tables (new page) List of Charts (new page) List of Figures (new page)
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
44 / 58
APPENDIX G
LIST OF TABLES and CHARTS
Table 3.1: Review of the studies nutritional information 20 Table 5.1: Profile of the respondents 21 Table 5.2: Correlations matrix of the key variables of the study 22 Table 5.3: Factor analysis of the items measuring Job satisfaction 23
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
45 / 58
APPENDIX H
LIST OF FIGURES OR CHARTS
Fig 2.1: Mowday's Turnover Model 30 Fig 2.2: Steers & Porter's Turnover Model 31 Fig 2.3: Conceptual framework of the study 35
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
46 / 58
APPENDIX I
CITING REFERENCES IN THE TEXT
Citation Conventions 1. State the last name of the author, comma and the
year…(Shah, 1998) 2. State the author the report according to chronology
separated by a semicolon….(Smith, 1995; Zoulkar, 1996)
3. Two citations of the same author…(Hazman, 1991; 1996).
4. If several authors, cite names of all for the first time and in subsequent citations (>2), use et al. …(Linda et al., 1997).
5. Organisational author….National Institute of Public Administration, 1997)
6. Newspaper…(Pillai, 2005) 7. Newspaper but author anonymous…(Risks of HIV… The
Star)
In the text of the dissertation The concept of accountability in administrative law and in political science has much in common with the current concern for quality (Hazman, 1996). Accountability of the government means, among other things, the need to account for the performance of the government in terms of the policies and resources against the actual performance. This imperative of democratic government carries with it the notion of being responsible or responsive to the governed (Loud and Mute, 1996). The present interest in and the introduction of, measures to ensure customer orientation is not unprecedented. In fact, it can be rightly claimed that philosophical ancestor of quality in government is
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
47 / 58
accountability. But the current focus is micro, with each unit being able to identify and satisfy the constituencies (Roman, et al., 1994). Osborne and Gaebler (1990) clearly stated that quality efforts in the government will enhance the democratic ethos and values by making the government more sensitive and effective. There are those who claim that customer orientation will shift attention to service provision and office management away from the policy issues (see for example, Woods, 1994; Ping, 1993; Davenport, 1990). Policy formulations are less amenable to quality determination. Policy and its formulation lie in the realm of politics, not economics or management (Wildavsky, 1987).
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
48 / 58
APPENDIX J
COMPLETE REFERENCE FORMAT.
1. Alphabetically arranged. 2. Single spaced 3. Hanging indent of 0.5” 4. No separation by type of reference i.e. books,
journal, websites etc. The classification below is merely for illustration only.
Journals Last name, (year in bracket). article title. Journal title in italics. Vol. No., pp. Mowday,K.L. (1995). Job satisfaction and job commitment, Malaysian Journal of Management. 2(1), 2-10.
Books Last name, (year in bracket), Title of book in italics. Place: Publisher. Robbin, L., (1991). Organisational Behaviour. Prentice-Hall. New York Eliot, H.L., (1980). Organisational Culture. Wiley & Sons. Chicago. Chapter in a book Roe, E.L. and Wade, K.J. (1995). Performance Appraisal In J,M Landy (ed.) Managing Performance: Prospects and Problems. (331-350) Wiley & Sons. Chicago If two references by same author in the same year, use 1981a, 1981b and so on to distinguish citations. Landy, J.M., (1993a). Evaluation or Assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 2(3), 788-800.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
49 / 58
_____(five spaces)(1993b). Eliminating rater bias. Personnel Psychology. 1(4), 344-360.
Organisational Authors
National Institute of Public Administration, (1998). Administrative Reforms Report. Government Printers: K.L. Ministry of Finance, (1997). Economic Report. Government Printers: K.L.
Newspaper (writer known or unknown) Pillai, (12 May,1998), SSB under attack over unfair appraisal The Star, N6 Anon.(19 Nov, 2005). SSB under attack for destroying teamwork. New Straits Times, 6
Citing from proceedings Ramis, J.K., (1980). Evaluating quality system in the government In Dorai (ed.) ISO 9000 and Quality Management System In Proceedings of the 7th international Seminar on Quality Systems (201-220), 10th-12th September, Kuala Lumpur.
Dissertations Hazman Shah, (1996). Human Resource Management Integration in Malaysian Organisations. Unpublished DBA dissertation. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Citing websites James, H.T., (1991). Data Cleaning. Retrieved from http://www.spss.com/articles/html on 23 Dec 2003. MAMPU, Bulletin MAMPU, 2005. Retrieved from www.mampu.gov.my on 23 Dec 2003.
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
50 / 58
APPENDIX K
TABLES
[Table title centered and table number follows the chapter number and a sequential numeral]
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS Illustration:
Table 5.1: Descriptive Statistics of the Key variables
No Variables Means Std Dev.
1 Structure 3.2 .87 2 Leadership 3.8 .56 3 Commitment 4.2 1.09 4 Incentive 4.1 .67 5 Information technology 3.1 .99 6 Type of function 3.6 .34 7 Customer satisfaction 4.1 .98 8 Staff satisfaction 2.3 .74 9 Relative Importance 3.5 .23
N=120
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
51 / 58
APPENDIX L
CHARTS/FIGURES
[Figure title centered and figure number follows the chapter number and a sequential numeral]
Chapter 2
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Framework of the Client Charter Effectiveness
Staff
Satisfaction
Commitment to
Quality
Specificity of
Assurance
Agency
Evaluation
Effectiveness
of Client
Charters
Client
Power
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
52 / 58
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EMAS RESEARCH PRESENTATION (30%)
No Criteria W* S** Comments
1 Preparation and Planning: Candidate comes prepared, cue cards, rehearsed etc. Whether the candidate used AV aids i.e. OHP, projectors, flipcharts etc. effectively.
10
3 Clarity of Presentation: Whether the research objectives, conceptual framework, method, findings and conclusions were stated clearly and succinctly
35
4 Ability to handle questions: Whether the candidate can provide satisfactory answers to questions posed by the evaluators.
35
5 Presentation skills: Whether the candidate was reading or speaking to the evaluators, makes eye contact, has poise, is confidence etc.
20
Total 100 * Weight, ** Score
Comments about the presentation: ………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………
Evaluator I Evaluator II
(………………………) (………………………)
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
53 / 58
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF THE
DISSERTATION (70%)
Dissertation Title: Name:
# Criteria W S1 S2 Comments
1 Problem statement & research objectives are clear, concise, relevant and connected. Scope and significance are adequately explained
5
2 Literature review No. of sources (adequacy) Nature of the sources (credibility) Logical organisation of the review (arrangement) Quality of the review (analysis)
10
3 Conceptual framework The concepts well defined, the relationships are clearly delineated and explained
10
4 Research method Research design: the design is stated clearly, accounted for and defended, Sample size & sampling technique: the approach to and the procedures involved in the selection of the sample and the determination of the sample size
15
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
54 / 58
Measurement: the operationalisation of the concepts is satisfactory. Data collection and Data analysis is clearly explained and is consistent with the research objectives.
5 Presentation and language: The proposal is substantially free of grammatical and typographical errors. The use of tables, charts, diagrams are appropriate and effective
10
6 Findings Brief profile provided and key elements described, some of the related assumptions are tested (normality, equal variance etc). The findings are presented clearly and effectively covering all the research objectives.
30
7 Discussion and conclusion The main findings are discussed in terms of the implications for the understanding of the issue and practice. Conclusion provided with adequate statement of the limitations (research design related limitations)
15
8 Adherence to the format provided The report follows all the requirements contained in the EMAS Dissertation
5
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
55 / 58
Guide.
9 Attendance at the supervisory sessions Good: attended all the sessions Average: attended most of the
sessions Poor: missed more a 1/3 of the
sessions
100
Legend W : Weight S : Score
---------------------------------------- Supervisor/Panel Chairperson
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
56 / 58
PERSONAL NOTES
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
57 / 58
C
causality · 26 conceptual framework · 21, 23, 24,
27, 57 conceptualisation · 6 confirmatory · 7 correlational · 12, 26
D
dissertation · 2, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 17, 20, 31, 32, 33, 37, 40, 41, 51, 54
E
empirical · 9, 12, 21, 28 Experimental · 26 exploratory · 7
F
factorial designs · 26
G
generalisability · 15, 16
H
Hair et al · 27 hypotheses · 21, 30, 31
K
K. Ohmae · 13
M
Miles & Huberman · 28
P
paradigm · 13, 21 phenomenon · 14, 15 Post Hoc analysis · 31
Q
qualitative · 7, 21, 27, 30, 45 quasi-experimental · 26
R
reliability · 25, 28, 29 research design · 16, 25, 60 response bias · 25, 29
S
sample size · 16, 27, 59 sampling frame · 28 sampling technique · 16, 25, 28, 59
T
Tabachnick & Fidel · 27 triangulation · 25
EMAS Dissertation Guide Version. 1.3
58 / 58
U
unit of analysis · 26, 27 units of analysis · 26
V
validity · 23, 25, 28, 29
top related