iwmi-tata policy paper...this policy paper highlights several infirmies with the current strategy...
TRANSCRIPT
HAR KHET KO PANI(Water to Every Farm)
Rethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Tushaar Shah
Shilp Verma
Neha Durga
Abhishek Rajan
Alankrita Goswami
Alka Palrecha
IWMI-TATA
POLICY PAPERJUNE 2016
*Corresponding author email: [email protected]
Contents
Execu�ve Summary 1
1. Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana 5
2. Type I and Type II Irriga�on 7
3. The Geography of Irriga�on Depriva�on in India 10
3.1 The most irriga�on deprived districts in India 10
3.2 Irriga�on depriva�on of India's Adivasi farmers 12
4. Water Resources of 'Irriga�on-deprived' Geography 13
5. Accelerated Irriga�on Benefits in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh post-2000 15
6. New Opportuni�es for Type II Irriga�on: The Promise of the Solar Pump 21
7. New Opportuni�es for Type II Irriga�on: Peri-urban Wastewater Irriga�on 23
7.1 Addressing public health and soil quality concerns 24
7.2 Opportuni�es for PMKSY 24
7.3 Agenda for Ac�on 25
8. PMKSY: Prac�cal Ways Forward 27
8.1 Reality of Indian Irriga�on 27
8.2 Objec�ves PMKSY should pursue and their Contextual Fit 28
8.3 PMKSY Interven�ons 29
8.4 PMKSY: Prac�cal Ways Forward 31
8.5 PMKSY: Implementa�on, Monitoring and Evalua�on 32
References 33
ANNEXURE A1: Clustering of Districts 34
Cluster #01: Most Deprived, Groundwater Surplus Districts (112) 35
Cluster #02: Groundwater Surplus; High Pump Density; Type II Irriga�on Constrained by High Energy Cost (36) 35
Cluster #03: Groundwater Surplus; High Pump Density; Type II Irriga�on Constrained by Inadequate Electricity Supply (24) 36
Cluster #04: Groundwater Deficit Alluvial Districts (103) 36
Cluster #05: Groundwater Deficit hard-rock Districts (27) 37
Cluster #06: Districts with Dense MMM Network (114) 37
Cluster #07: Districts with High Density of Irriga�on Tanks and WHS (161) 38
Cluster #08: Districts with Class I and II Towns 38
Cluster #09: Hill Districts in Eastern and Western Himalayas (100) 39
Cluster #10: Districts with High Irriga�on Incidence and High Produc�vity (54) 39
Cluster #11: Districts with High Irriga�on Incidence but Low Produc�vity (41) 40
Cluster #12: Urban and UT Districts (25) 40
ANNEXURE A2: District-wise Database 42
Execu�ve Summary
Har Khet Ko Pani?
In its manifesto for 2014 parliamentary elec�ons, Bhara�ya Janata Party gave pride of place to universalizing
irriga�on access by including Har Hath Ko Kam, Har Khet Ko Pani as one of its commitments. A�er the NDA
government came to power, this commitment took the form of Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana with an alloca�on
of ₹ 50,000 crore over 2015-2020 period with an addi�onal ₹ 20,000 crore placed at the disposal of NABARD. As
currently designed, PMKSY has four components: Accelerated Irriga�on Benefits Program (₹ 11,060 crore), 'per drop,
more crop' component (₹ 16,300 crore) to support micro-irriga�on, watershed program (₹ 13,590 crore) and a new
component called Har Khet Ko Pani (₹ 9,050 crore) to construct one water harves�ng structure per village by 2020.
The implementa�on of PMKSY was to be kicked off with the prepara�on of District Irriga�on Plans (DIPs) by state
governments using a format provided by Government of India. Some 240 district plans are apparently ready although
only Chha�sgarh and Nagaland have placed their DIPs in public domain.
Is PMKSY on the right path? Does it have the poten�al to deliver Har Khet Ko Pani? Does it reflect the current
irriga�on reality of India? Is there a be�er way to design and implement PMKSY to target effort and resources where
it ma�ers most? This IWMI-Tata Policy Paper offers an early analysis to help implement a be�er PMKSY with greater
poten�al for socio-economic and livelihood impacts.
Infirmi�es in current design
This policy paper highlights several infirmi�es with the current strategy as well as implementa�on roadmap for
PMKSY.
1. The promise of Har Khet Ko Pani had invoked expecta�ons about bold new irriga�on thinking; but PMKSY's
current avtar is a hotchpotch of pre-exis�ng schemes such as AIBP and micro-irriga�on subsidies with an
indifferent track record. The only new component, Har Khet Ko Pani, is neither clear in objec�ves nor is
adequately funded.
2. As BJP chief ministers of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, Prime Minister Modi and Shivraj Singh Chauhan had
created veritable irriga�on miracles in their states with their irrigated area as well as agricultural GDP growing at
double-digit rates post-2000. The expecta�on was that PMKSY will replicate these sterling achievements on the
na�onal scale by learning from irriga�on strategies these states followed; in its current design, PMKSY betrays
no such learning.
3. PMKSY also overlooks that especially since 1990: [a] the gap between Irriga�on Poten�al Created (IPC) and
Irriga�on Poten�al U�lised (IPU) under government-managed Major, Medium and Minor Irriga�on Projects
(MMMIPs), the so-called Type I irriga�on, steadily increased, resul�ng in li�le or no benefits from public
irriga�on investments to Indian agriculture; [b] that the bulk of the 40 million hectares (mha) of new irriga�on has
come from wells/tubewells and private li� irriga�on (Type II irriga�on); [c] that farmers prefer Type II irriga�on
because it can be created quickly, cost-effec�vely, by private investment and offers year-round on-farm water
control; [d] government ac�on can sustain Type II irriga�on importantly by inves�ng in groundwater recharge and
by improving the Management, Opera�on and Maintenance (MO&M) of public and community structures such
as watersheds, irriga�on tanks, canals — all of which sustain Type II irriga�on.
4. The irriga�on strategies of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh were built on this reality. Under Modi, Gujarat targeted
half a million electricity connec�ons for tubewells to SC/ST farmers; gave a fillip to irriga�on by improving the
quality of farm power supply; invested in groundwater recharge and began desil�ng 5,000 reservoirs/tanks every
year; increased area under micro-irriga�on from less than 50,000 ha in 2002 to 13 lakh ha in 2015, and began
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
1
Figure ES.1: Percentage Adivasi holdings and access to Type II irriga�on in 112 districts
Figure ES.2: Poten�al for 10,000 m³/year wells (in lakhs) from available surplus groundwater resources
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
2
Overexploited (more than 100% GWD)
Cri�cal (90-100% GWD)
Semi-cri�cal (70-90% GWD)
Safe (Less than 70% GWD)
Poten�al number of wells (in lakhs) per district#
Less than 10%
10 - 30%
30 - 50%
More than 50%
Percentage of holdings having access to Type II Irriga�on
ST Holdings (%) and Access to Type II Irriga�on
#
laying buried pipelines to take Narmada water close to farms. Under Chauhan, similarly, Madhya Pradesh began
issuing a million temporary winter season electricity connec�ons for wheat irriga�on, subsidized farm ponds,
revived 4,000 defunct minor irriga�on projects and introduced major reforms in canal irriga�on management.
Both the states implemented a broad-based mul�-pronged irriga�on development strategy that maximized farm
holdings under Type II irriga�on.
5. The 30-odd DIPs available on the internet show no such urgency to provide year-round on-farm water control to
farm holdings as Gujarat and MP strove for. DIPs are variable in quality; most are comprehensive, long term
water resource plans rather than plans for ensuring Har Khet Ko Pani with urgency. They vary also in ambi�on
level; the DIP for Raipur in Chha�sgarh demands only ₹ 352 crore; Bargarh's indent is for ₹ 2,800 crore; and
Rajnandgaon in Chhat�sgarh wants ₹ 4,900 crore. If we go by DIPs, Chha�sgarh alone requires over ₹ 45,000
crore over 2015-2020 period for PMKSY, with li�le le� for other states from the total alloca�on of ₹ 50,000
crore.
Recommended Strategy
1. Instead of spreading resources thin, PMKSY should focus on the unirrigated half of India's agrarian landscape.
Leave alone ensuring Har Khet Ko Pani, the current design of PMKSY will add no more than 5 mha of new assured
irriga�on. The 23 priority AIBP projects bypass most irriga�on-deprived districts of the country. Micro-irriga�on
subsidies will go only to geographies that already have Type II irriga�on. Watershed programs might benefit the
deprived geography; but past experience shows that the watershed benefit that farmers value most is in
improved groundwater recharge; in districts with few irriga�on wells, watershed programs will stabilize kharif
crop but offer no irriga�on for rabi and summer crops. PMKSY interven�ons must be sequen�al: first expand
access to affordable Type II irriga�on from wells, pumps and pipes; then promote micro-irriga�on; and support
this irriga�on economy by inves�ng in watershed treatment, groundwater recharge, and conjunc�ve
management of groundwater and surface water from tanks and canals.
2. Within the unirrigated half, PMKSY should priori�se Irriga�on Deprived Districts. In 170 best irrigated districts of
India, 70 per cent or more of farm holdings have Type II irriga�on access from one source or the other. Those
without a cap�ve source here benefit from vibrant decentralised markets for irriga�on service. These have to be
contrasted with 112 districts of the country where less than 30 per cent of farm holdings have access to
irriga�on. Here, irriga�on service markets are primi�ve or non-existent; and not having cap�ve irriga�on source
condemns a farmer to vagaries of rainfed farming. Before all else, PMKSY should focus on these districts and
increase the propor�on of holdings with cap�ve source of Type II irriga�on.
3. Even within these districts, PMKSY should proac�vely target Adivasi farm holdings which are more irriga�on-
deprived than the rest. As Figure ES.1 shows, even within irriga�on deprived districts, o�en less than 10 per cent
of Adivasi farms have irriga�on compared to the district average of up to 30 per cent.
4. The quickest and most cost-effec�ve way of providing Type II irriga�on to these holdings is by helping them
aquire a well/borewell and a pump with 500 meters of distribu�on pipe. Since most of these districts have poor
electricity grid development, a major challenge is of providing affordable energy. PMKSY should design a loan-
subsidy scheme to enable Adivasi farmers to own a dug well, a 3.5-5 kWp solar pump and 500 meters of flexible
distribu�on pipe. Each such system can be purchased for ₹ 4.5-5 lakh and can provide high quality supplemental
irriga�on to a gross area of 3-5 hectares.
5. All 105 out of the 112 irriga�on deprived districts are cleared by the Central Groundwater Board as 'safe' (<70%
development) for groundwater development with more than half of the es�mated groundwater available for
further development. As Figure ES.2 shows, these 112 districts have enough unu�lised groundwater to sustain
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
3
35.7 million new irriga�on wells with an average annual water output of 10,000 m without any threat of over-
exploi�ng the aquifers. With watershed programs, tank desilta�on, and Managed Aquifer Recharge, this poten�al
can be further enhanced. PMKSY should aim at 1-1.5 million solarized irriga�on wells in target 112 districts by
2020. These will add 5-7.5 mha of Type II irriga�on in the country's most 'irriga�on deprived' districts.
6. India's towns and ci�es release some 15 BCM of wastewater per year. Because wastewater offers year-round,
on-farm water control and high nutrient content, towns have the poten�al to become peri-urban irriga�on
systems par excellence. India's wastewater irriga�on economy is already booming, but by default, rather than by
design. PMKSY should pilot a range of cost-effec�ve treatment technologies for wastewater to facilitate its safe
use in irriga�on.
7. There is a need to rethink the role of AIBP. During the past three five-year plan periods, our investments in
government irriga�on projects are largely funded by state governments with the central contribu�on being 10-
15 per cent, mostly under AIBP. However, because states invest li�le in proper management and maintenance,
these systems are stuck in a 'build-neglect-rebuild' syndrome. Instead of supplemen�ng state investments in
construc�ng new systems, AIBP should focus on incen�vising and suppor�ng state governments in improving
the management and maintenance of Major, Medium and Minor irriga�on systems to quickly close the gap
between IPC and IPU. A proposal to catalyse this through the Na�onal Irriga�on Management Fund (NIMF)
already exists in the XII five-year plan.
8. With diverse geography, hydrogeology and socio-economic condi�ons, different parts of the country face
different irriga�on-water challenges and therefore require differen�ated program strategies. Annexure A.1
proposes and explains a clustering of districts along various parameters for be�er planning and targe�ng of
PMKSY interven�ons (see Table A.1).
9. Table 9 in sec�on 8.3 of this paper outlines a broad-based, mul�-pronged irriga�on strategy with a set of 15
interven�ons that PMKSY should help India implement in order to truly scale out BJP governments' irriga�on
success in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. Table 10 in sec�on 8.4 tries to fit the proposed interven�ons to their
unique irriga�on-water reali�es. It iden�fies which of the interven�ons are most cri�cal for each district cluster.
Ensuring Har Khet Ko Pani in India is hard to achieve in a long �me; but if we have any chance of reaching that
goal, we need to rethink the current strategy of PMKSY as outlined in this policy paper.
10. Finally, the implementa�on of PMKSY must be supported through independent, third-party reviews. Credible
civil society organiza�ons, philanthropic trusts, NGOs and CSRs can play a crucial role in this. Especially in the
112 'most irriga�on deprived' districts, the Tata Trusts have a strong presence and an elaborate network of field
partners. PMKSY can draw lessons from their field experience, synergize investments to build on their work, and
also use the network to conduct periodic, transparent reviews of program implementa�on.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
4
1. Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana
In the 2014 run up to Parliamentary elec�ons, the BJP manifesto gave pride of place to irriga�on development. 'Har
Haath Ko Kaam, Har Khet Ko Paani'¹ was the declared credo of the Party's agrarian strategy. Given that nearly half of
India's farm holdings are totally rainfed, this is an ambi�ous goal indeed, and consonant with the government's
declared goal of doubling farmers' incomes in five years. Speedy execu�on of the river linking project, at least one
new water conserva�on structure per village, speedy comple�on of irriga�on projects and massive expansion of
micro-irriga�on systems to achieve 'more crop per drop' were advanced as the instruments to achieve the vision.
A poli�cal manifesto is not expected to detail opera�onal strategy. However, upon assuming power, the new
Government announced Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) and in 2016-17 Union Budget, the Finance
Minister provided a more detailed explana�on of how the NDA government plans to use PMKSY to ensure “Har Khet
Ko Pani”. Table 1 outlines the overall profile of the PMKSY and its components. The total outlay proposed is 50,000 ₹
crore over 2015-2020, spread over four key components. Components 1, 3 and 4 are pre-exis�ng programs and
receive 80 per cent of the outlay. The only new components is that of crea�ng a water harves�ng structure in every
village – Har Khet Ko Pani – but it is allocated less than 20 per cent of the total resources.
Table 1: Profile and components of PMKSY
In overall terms, PMKSY total outlay compares reasonably well with X Plan central sector outlay of 9,661 crore and ₹
XI Plan outlay of 24,759 crore (at 2006-07 prices)². But it is less than total central alloca�on (at current prices) of ₹
₹ ₹ 66,530 crore to PMKSY type programs in the XII Five Year Plan that included 42,171 crore for Major, Medium,
and Minor Irriga�on Projects (MMMIP), 4,600 crore for Na�onal Irriga�on Management Fund (NIMF), 5,000 crore ₹ ₹
for revival of tradi�onal water bodies and 15,359 crores of central sector alloca�on for watershed development.₹
For a program that aims to ensure Har Khet Ko Pani, funding of PMKSY by itself has less significance than the
underlying thinking and strategy. When the object of irriga�on development is achieving na�onal food security, it is
important to concentrate resources on districts with highest poten�al for agricultural produc�on. This was done
under Intensive Agricultural Development Program (IADP) during the 1960s that ushered in our Green Revolu�on
beginning in north-western parts. When the object of irriga�on planning is to fully develop available water resources
to the benefit of the na�on, it is natural that energy and resources are invested in geographies which have water
resource poten�al for large dams and canal systems. This has been the mandate of Central Water Commission and
Na�onal Water Development Agency in planning large mul�-purpose irriga�on and hydro-power projects.
¹h�p://www.bjp.org/index.php?op�on=com_content&view=ar�cle&id=4412&ca�d=68:press-releases&Itemid=494 ²h�p://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/planrel/12thplan/pdf/12fyp_vol1.pdf table 3.15; but these numbers are at 2006-07 prices.
PMKSYComponents
Ministry / Department
Physical Target(in lakh ha)
Indica�ve Outlay(in ₹ crores)
2015-20 2015-16 2015-20 2015-16
1. AIBP
MoWR, RD&GR
7.5 1.2 11,060 1,000
2. Har Khet Ko Pani 21.0 2.8 9,050 1,000
3. Per Drop, More CropDept. of Agriculture and
Coopera�on100.0 5.0 16,300 1,800
4. Watershed development Dept. of Land Resources 11.5 4.4 13,590 1,500
TOTAL - - - 50,000 5,300
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
5
Today, however, na�onal food security is not a burning issue; India is emerging as a farm expor�ng power. The
country s�ll has a great deal of hunger but that is arguably not due to lack of food produc�on. Similarly, since 1830,
we have kept inves�ng large sums in developing our surface water resources by construc�ng MMMIP at appropriate
sites. Our challenge today is that despite all these investments, nearly half of our farm holdings are deprived of any
irriga�on source, and are therefore vulnerable to low produc�vity and drought risks. When the object of irriga�on is
stabilizing and improving agrarian livelihoods by ensuring Har Khet Ko Pani, it makes sense to focus energy and
resources on geographies and social classes which remain most 'irriga�on deprived'. PMKSY should then be centrally
about addressing and overcoming 'irriga�on depriva�on' in India's smallholder agrarian economy.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
6
2. Type I and Type II Irriga�on
Over the past 50 years, Indian agriculture has witnessed two dis�nct pa�erns in irriga�on development; these can be
called Type I and Type II irriga�on. Type I irriga�on is typically based on government constructed, owned, and
operated structures as MMMIP. In addi�on, Type I irriga�on also includes flow irriga�on from 600,000 tradi�onal
irriga�on tanks, numerous hill irriga�on systems and kuhls. These are typically supply-driven and score low on year-
round, on-farm water control to the farmer. Type II irriga�on, in contrast, is demand-driven, created through private
investment, commands much smaller area per structure, is privately owned and managed but offers the farmer high
level of year-round, on-farm water control. Some key differences between Type I and Type II irriga�on are highlighted
in Table 2.
Table 2: Key differences between Type I and Type II irriga�on
Not only India, but all of South Asia and many other parts of the world, have witnessed explosive growth in Type II
irriga�on during recent decades. It has grown en�rely in response to demand-pull from farmers, but is made possible
by availability of affordable rigs and drilling equipment, pumps, pipes. Governments at centre and in states have
supported Type II irriga�on crea�on not under its irriga�on programs but under agricultural and rural development
programs. All evidence available shows that especially since 1990, over 95 per cent of new irrigated farm holdings
have been delivered through Type II Irriga�on from privately owned groundwater wells or li� irriga�on schemes
powered by electricity or diesel (see Figure 1).
Ini�ally, groundwater based Type II irriga�on emerged in command areas of MMMIP and tanks to recycle and benefit
from canal and tank irriga�on recharge; but soon, the tail began to wag the dog as farmer preference for Type II
irriga�on soared. In areas outside canal and tank commands, watershed development programs a�racted
par�cipa�on because they offered work opportuni�es and recharged wells. Gradually, check dams, percola�on ponds
and other such structures began to be constructed to help sustain groundwater-based Type II irriga�on. The role of
Type I public and community irriga�on schemes has changed increasingly to support Type II irriga�on.
The year-round, on-demand water control offered by Type II irriga�on makes small farms far more produc�ve and
resilient compared to Type I irriga�on. Type II irriga�on is mostly dependent on groundwater wells; but there is also
growing spread of li� irriga�on and piped delivery of water on many MMMIP as well as rivers and streams. Table 3
reports results of a survey undertaken in the command of Sardar Sarovar project in Gujarat and compares farmers
Type I Irriga�on Type II Irriga�on
Public / CPR Private / Group / Market
Single system may service 20 – 1,500,000 Ha Typically serves 1 – 20 ha
Head – Tail inequity endemic Head – Tail inequity rare
Level of irriga�on service �ed to effec�veness of irriga�on bureaucracy
Immune to bureaucra�c lethargy, but affected by fuel prices or anarchy in electricity distribu�on
Surface Ground / Surface / Surface Flow
Gravity flow in open channels Piped water delivery with mechanical or kine�c energy
Unsuited for micro irriga�on without pressure Ready for micro irriga�on
On-farm water deliveries 6-12 �mes /year On-farm water deliveries, at-will, year-round
Farming system adapts to the irriga�on regime Irriga�on regime adapts to farming system
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
7
8
who received Type I irriga�on and those who li�ed canal water for Type II irriga�on from the same canal system. The
table shows the vast difference in the income effect of Type I and Type II irriga�on.
Figure 1: Irrigated area by source, 1950 - 51 onwards
Data Sources: Ministry of Agriculture, Central Water Commission, Water Resources Informa�on System Directorate, Ministry of
Sta�s�cs and Programme Implementa�on, Government of India. Data retrieved from www.indiastat.com
Table 3: Income impacts of Type I and Type II irriga�on in Sardar Sarovar project
Source: Created by authors based on data presented in Jagadeesan and Kumar (2015)
In his 2003-04 and 2004-05 work, Ramesh Chand analysed drivers of inter-district varia�ons in agricultural
produc�vity in 477 districts of India. What is the role of Type I and Type II irriga�on in explaining inter-district
produc�vity varia�on? To understand this ques�on, we arranged districts in ascending order of their value of farm
output, divided them into 10 classes and explored if access to Type I and II irriga�on have any role to play in
produc�vity rise. The chart in Figure 2 shows the results. As we move from low to high produc�vity classes, the
45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
19
50
-51
19
53
-54
19
56
-57
19
59
-60
19
62
-63
19
65
-66
19
68
-69
19
71
-72
19
74
-75
19
77
-78
19
80
-81
19
83
-84
19
86
-87
19
89
-90
19
92
-93
19
95
-96
19
98
-99
20
01
-02
(P
)
20
04
-05
(P
)
20
07
-08
(P
)
20
10
-11
(P)
Canals Tanks
Wells
Irri
ga
ted
Are
a (
'00
0 H
a)
Other Sources
Type I Type II
Gravity flowBharuch, Panchamahal, Narmada
and Vadodara
Canal li�Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Narmada, Mehsana, Bharuch, Surendranagar
Number of farm families surveyed 179 254
Before SSP: Average Gross Cropped Area (ha) 3.71 3.75
A�er SSP: Average Gross Cropped Area (ha) 4.02 10.30
Average household income from crops and dairying before SSP ( )₹
47,580 57,229
Average increase in household income from crops and dairying due to SSP ( )₹
169,003 461,749
Percentage increase in average household income 355% 807%
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
9
propor�on of area under Type I irriga�on grows, but that under Type II irriga�on grows much faster. In the highest
produc�vity class, the role of Type II irriga�on is greatly accentuated while that of Type I irriga�on declines. The
reason is not far to seek: year-round, on-farm water control plays a major role in improving produc�vity of farming
systems and agrarian livelihoods especially in a context of constantly shrinking size of the holding.
Figure 2: Access to Type I and Type II irriga�on across agricultural produc�vity categories
Poli�cians in India with their ear to the ground are more alive to Type II irriga�on than irriga�on planners. This is why
state leaders like in Gujarat and allocate large funds to provide farmers electricity connec�ons, Madhya Pradesh (MP)
to fill up irriga�on tanks, to increase groundwater recharge, to offer piped water supply for irriga�on rather than in
open channels. They realise that even a�er inves�ng billions in Type I structures, farmers will s�ll crave for Type II
irriga�on. For example, consider Gujarat's 2016-17 budget whose alloca�on for providing on-farm water control is
more in tune with the Har Khet Ko Pani ambi�on: ₹ 9,050 crore for Sardar Sarovar piped distribu�on, ₹ 5,244 crore for
canal maintenance, li� irriga�on schemes, check dams and pipelines for filling up tanks; ₹ 2,000 crore for filling up
215 reservoirs in Saurashtra with Narmada water; ₹ 765 crore for micro-irriga�on on 3 lakh ha; ₹ 4,010 crore
towards farm power subsidies; ₹ 1,643 crore for 1 lakh new tubewell connec�ons, all of which add up to ₹ 22,700
crore for a single year³.
³h�p://anandibenpatel.com/wp-content/uploads/FM-Speech-Forma�ed1.pdf
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%1.2-13 13-18 18-22 22-25 25-28 28-33 33-38 38-48 48-59 >59
Agricultural Produc�vity per ha ( ) ('000)₹
Type I (% of NSA)
Type II (% of NSA)
10
GW Availability (%)
NA
nega�ve
0-20
20-50
50-100
3. The Geography of Irriga�on Depriva�on in India
Nobody has done the sums but since Independence, India's central and state governments together would have easily
invested 800-900 lakh crore (at current prices) in public (Type I) irriga�on projects of various sizes. These ₹
investments have produced vast benefits; deserts of Punjab, Haryana, western Rajasthan which earlier could support
nothing but nomadic livestock economy have transformed into lush green, highly produc�ve agrarian economies in
our north-west. In the southern region, too, many MMMIP have created pockets of agrarian riches. During recent
decades, a silent groundwater irriga�on revolu�on has taken irriga�on to regions outside the command areas, too.
But a�er all these investments, our agrarian economy today is s�ll characterised by 'irriga�on-have' and 'irriga�on-
have-not' districts and farm-holdings. According to 2011 Agricultural Census, 48 per cent of our farm holdings do not
have irriga�on from any source; while 52 per cent benefit from one or more sources. Our 'irriga�on deprived districts'
fall in two categories. The first comprises hill farming systems — in Kashmir, Himachal, U�arakhand, North-eastern
states, and districts like Darjeeling, Coorg, Nilgiris, Idukki, Wayanad — where the value-produc�vity of farming is
already among the highest in the country. Here, irriga�on is not a binding constraint on produc�vity increase and
there seems no urgent need for irriga�on expansion although these systems may benefit from other development
interven�ons. The second category is of semi-arid and arid districts of the plains in peninsular India—Maharashtra,
parts of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, Gujarat, MP, Chhat�sgarh, Jharkhand and Orissa. Some water-rich
humid districts—in North Bihar, Assam, coastal Orissa—too suffer high level of irriga�on depriva�on.
3.1 The most irriga�on deprived districts in India
Figure 3 highlights the geography of severe irriga�on depriva�on in the country. As outlined earlier, in Hill districts,
irriga�on-depriva�on is not a produc�vity-depressant and therefore less of a problem. However, it is in the central
Indian tribal highlands, Tribal Rajasthan and in the Deccan region that India's real irriga�on have-not districts and
farm holdings are concentrated. Indeed, according to the 2011 Agricultural Census, more than 60 per cent of India's
totally 'irriga�on-deprived' farm holdings are concentrated in the states of Assam, Bihar, Chhat�sgarh, Jharkhand,
Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh (especially, Rayalaseema), Telangana and Orissa.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Figure 3: The most irriga�on deprived districts with propor�on ofunirrigated holdings
Figure 4: Groundwater availability in India's 126 most irriga�on deprived districts
Of the 126 most irriga�on deprived districts, 14 districts (mostly in Rajasthan and some in Peninsular India) are
already u�lizing more than 80 per cent of their annual renewable groundwater resource (see Figure 4). This leaves
112 most deprived districts that have surplus groundwater available for future irriga�on development (Cluster #01⁴).
The chart in Figure 5 compares 100 best-off and 126 worst-off districts in terms of irriga�on access. The la�er are
substan�ally worse off in terms of both access to irriga�on from MMMIP as well as from private groundwater wells
and li� irriga�on systems.
Figure 5: Differences in irriga�on access in India's best-off and worst-off districts
There are other markers of 'irriga�on depriva�on' too. Table 4 uses the 2003-04 and 2004-05 data set compiled by
Ramesh Chand and others (2011) and data from the 4 Minor Irriga�on Census (2006-07; GoI 2014) to examine th
differences in irriga�on access in these two classes of "Irriga�on Have" and “Irriga�on Have-not” districts. The
Irriga�on have-not districts have 1/3 the agricultural output/ha, 25 per cent lower cropping intensity, a quarter of rd
energy use in agriculture and 1/5 of the groundwater irriga�on pumping capacity compared to the 'Irriga�on have' th
districts.
Table 4: How disadvantaged really are irriga�on-deprived districts?
3.2 Irriga�on depriva�on of India's Adivasi farmers
Apart from this spa�al concentra�on, there is also a social dimension to irriga�on depriva�on as outlined in Table 5
which again draws upon data sets from the Agricultural Census 2011. Of India's 138 million farm holdings, 12 million
are owned and operated by Adivasi farmers; these are bigger in size than our average farm holdings but are seriously
deficient in irriga�on access. Indeed, Adivasi farm holdings are substan�ally more 'irriga�on-deprived' than Dalit-
operated farm holdings.
⁴For a detailed discussion on clustering of districts for PMKSY, see Annexure A1.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
11
%served byMMMIP
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0%served byprivate wells
100 most irrigated districts
126 most irriga�on deprived districts
All districts (average)
Nu
mb
er
of
dis
tric
ts
Parameters100 most irrigated districts
(average)126 most irriga�on deprived
(average)Na�onal(average)
Agricultural Produc�vity ( per hectare)₹ 47,142 17,837 27,500
Cropping Intensity (%) 170 125 136
Energy consump�on (kWh)/Net Sown Area (NSA) 1134 278 513
Groundwater wells per 1000 opera�onal holdings 247 107 143
Groundwater pump horse power (HP) per 100 ha NSA 206 40 90
Table 5: Adivasi farm-holdings are most 'irriga�on-deprived’
All in all, the social and spa�al dimensions of 'irriga�on depriva�on' come together in 126 districts we have iden�fied
in Figure 3. These should ideally be top priority districts for PMKSY because, without targe�ng them, there is no way
to reach Har Khet Ko Pani. Under its present design, PMKSY has li�le to offer to these districts. Its large outlay on
micro-irriga�on under Per-drop-more-crop is of li�le benefit to these districts because access to pump irriga�on,
which is a pre-condi�on for adop�ng micro-irriga�on, has limited spread in these districts. The micro-irriga�on
program will have most impact in districts which are already densely populated by tubewells. There is a gradual move
to introduce micro-irriga�on in canal commands too; however, this requires reconfiguring the distribu�on systems,
replacing open channel water transport by piped transport under pressure. If and when this is done, it is likely that
pre-exis�ng command areas will be the first to benefit from such technologies.
Similarly, the AIBP component of PMKSY has li�le to offer to the 'most irriga�on-deprived' districts. The chart in thFigure 6 shows that 23 priority AIBP projects which will receive 1/5 of PMKSY funds during 2015-2020 period will
offer li�le to Jharkhand, Chhat�sgarh, Assam, Bihar, Karnataka, Tribal Rajasthan, and tribal Gujarat which have bulk of
the irriga�on-deprived districts of the country. In effect, then, the only components which will offer some support to
these districts are Har Khet Ko Pani and watershed development. India's irriga�on experience shows that produc�vity
and livelihood impacts of watershed development and water harves�ng structures is much greater in areas where
these support intensive groundwater irriga�on through recharge rather than in areas where such structures are used
for direct irriga�on or soil moisture management. Indeed if tank irriga�on were so much of a draw for farmers,
peninsular India's 600,000 irriga�on tanks would not have fallen into disrepair as they have during recent years. And
if their value as groundwater recharge structures were not a big draw for farmers, we would not see such an upsurge
of interest in desil�ng tanks as for example, Telangana's Mission Kaka�ya signifies
Figure 6: Mismatch between AIBP alloca�on (23 priority projects) and irriga�on depriva�on of states
ALL SC ST
Number of farm holdings (million) 138.3 17.1 12.0
Average size of farm holding (hectares) 1.15 0.80 1.52
Percentage holdings receiving any irriga�on 52 54 30
Percentage of land under irriga�on 52 40 19
Percentage holdings irrigated by canals and tanks 16 18 10
Percentage holdings irrigated by wells, tubewells and other sources 38 36 23
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
12
State's share in India's unirrigated farm holdings (%)
State's share in 23 AIBP schemes (%)
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
BIH
AR
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
KA
RN
AT
AK
A
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KE
RA
LA
RA
JAS
TH
AN
OR
ISS
A
GU
JAR
AT
AS
SA
M
CH
HA
TT
IGA
RH
TA
MIL
NA
DU
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
JHA
RK
HA
ND
HIM
AC
HA
L P
RA
DE
SH
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
TR
IPU
RA
UT
TA
RA
KH
AN
D
ME
GH
AL
AY
A
HA
RY
AN
A
NA
GA
LA
ND
MA
NIP
UR
MIZ
OR
AM
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
SIK
KIM
GO
A
D &
N H
AV
EL
I
PU
NJA
B
LA
KS
HA
DW
EE
P
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
DA
MA
N &
DIU
DE
LH
I
CH
AN
DIG
AR
H
4. Water Resources of 'Irriga�on-deprived' Geography
Type I irriga�on poten�al takes a long gesta�on period extending in some large projects to 30-40 years. The
investment required too is large at 5-7 lakh/hectare. Finally, India (and many other countries) are increasingly ₹
realising that the area actually benefited by Type I irriga�on structures turns out to be considerably smaller than
planned, partly because of erroneous assump�ons about future farmers behaviour but equally because of complex
irriga�on management challenges these projects present.
The best thing about Type II irriga�on is that its poten�al can be easily expanded, quickly, at a much lower capital
cost than Type I irriga�on. A Type II system can be commissioned in a week, if not a day. Because they are owned and
operated by farmers or their groups, they are easier to manage and perform to their poten�al. Poli�cal leaders like
Devi Lal with an earthy sense of what farmers want recognised the poten�al of shallow tubewells (STWs) in
expanding Type II irriga�on in the Ganga basin. His Million Wells Scheme launched during the 1980's provided
borewells and diesel pumps to hundreds of thousands of farmers in the Ganga plains and explains why density of
groundwater structures is so high in that region. Such a program would be ideal for India's 'irriga�on-deprived'
geography, too; but does this geography have the water resource, especially groundwater to support expansion on
groundwater-based Type II irriga�on?
Our irriga�on deprived geography does not have the abundant groundwater resources that the Ganga basin has; but
only a small por�on of the water resource it has is developed; and it has significant scope to augment groundwater
recharge that is not yet recognized. None of India's 58 'dark' or 89 'over-exploited' groundwater districts is in the
irriga�on-deprived geography. These are mostly in Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu, all of which are
outside the target geography. True, in these danger zones, further expansion of groundwater use for Type II irriga�on
will only aggravate groundwater deple�on. If anything, our focus here should be on enhancing water use efficiency
and produc�vity, improving aquifer recharge, and enlarging areas under conjunc�ve management of groundwater
and surface water where possible.
CGWB's 2011 es�mates of dynamic groundwater resources, however, show that the 112 districts of India's
irriga�on-deprived geography, where more than 70 per cent of the farm holdings are un-irrigated, have substan�al
scope for expanding Type II irriga�on without posing any threat of resource over-exploita�on even without Managed
Aquifer Recharge (MAR) works. Half or more of the es�mated groundwater poten�al in these districts is available for
development. Moreover, many of these districts receive more precipita�on than India's driest districts leaving room
for augmen�ng groundwater resource through MAR interven�ons.
If these districts have so large unu�lized groundwater resource, why do they suffer irriga�on depriva�on on such a
large scale anyways? In our analysis, four factors get implicated:
· Scarcity of pump capital: Many of these districts have much lower density of energized wells/ borewells at less
than 9 structures per 100 hectares of net sown area compared to India's average of 14; the difference becomes
even larger if we compare installed horsepower (HP) per net sown area.
· Prohibi�ve energy costs: India's Type II irriga�on economy is marked by an energy divide (see Figure 7). In India's
western states, Type II irriga�on is energized by subsidized electricity supply as the main driver. In eastern India
too, all states bar West Bengal offer farm power subsidies; however, these have li�le electricity to offer and no
grid network to reach it to farmers. Type II irriga�on in eastern India is thus run on diesel which, when efficiency
differences are factored in, costs 8-10/kWh compared to 0-1/kWh that farmers in western India pay. High ₹ ₹
energy costs not only deepen 'irriga�on depriva�on' in 126 pump-capital-scarce districts but also some 36
districts where pump-density is comparable to the na�onal average but u�liza�on rate of pumps-borewells is
low.
· Energy scarcity: Then there are 24 odd districts which have high pump density, subsidized electricity and
comfortable groundwater balance, and quite high 'irriga�on depriva�on' simply because they get too li�le power
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
13
supply, of very poor quality (frequent interrup�on,
low voltage), mostly during the night on a schedule
neither predictable nor reliable. Parts of Karnataka,
Vidarbha, Rayalaseema are illustra�ve of this
condi�on.
· Dry Season Recharge Scarcity: Finally, especially in
hard-rock peninsular India, Type II irriga�on
depriva�on is caused by insufficient groundwater
recharge rela�ve to demand. Many of these are
based on shallow fractured aquifer systems with
limited storage and infiltra�on rates that circulate
monsoonal recharge in an annual cycle. A�er a good
monsoon, wells and bores come alive during winter
and, at �mes, even summer; a�er a bad monsoon,
wells become dry.
When the focus of policy is only on Type II irriga�on
expansion based on groundwater, much of India's hard-
rock geography is bound to experience periodic (not
permanent) recharge-scarcity. However, the experience
of Saurashtra region in Gujarat over the past two decades has shown that, pari passu with groundwater development,
investments in storing rainwater and accelera�ng groundwater recharge can contribute greatly to reducing aquifer
stress. Saurashtra's recharge movement was based on construc�ng large number of new check dams, percola�on
ponds, and such other rainwater harves�ng and recharge structures. However, the 'Irriga�on-deprived geography' of
India already has hundreds of thousands of tradi�onal irriga�on tanks, each much larger than a typical Saurashtra
check-dam. Figure 8 shows massive concentra�on of irriga�on tanks in the irriga�on-deprived geography of India.
Each dot represents surface storage of 10 million
cubic meters. In a good monsoon, these can have
more than one fillings and, if prepared for enhanced
percola�on and infiltra�on, these can contribute much
to enhanced groundwater resource. As a result, tank-
groundwater conjunc�ve management can offer many
possibili�es of sustainable Type II irriga�on
development that are yet to be fully explored.
The import of this discussion is that achieving the
ambi�on of Har Khet Ko Pani in the irriga�on-deprived
geography will require a broad-based, mul�-pronged
strategy of achieving fuller u�lisa�on of Type I
irriga�on investments, rapid expansion of Type II
irriga�on structures, and a variety of interven�ons
that make Type I and II irriga�on expansion
sustainable. And nobody knows this be�er than BJP
governments. During recent years, BJP governments
in Gujarat and MP have set new records in
accelera�ng irriga�on benefits by pursuing such
broad-based, mul�-pronged strategy which arguably
ought to be the template for PMKSY.
Figure 7: The energy divide in India's Type II irriga�on economy
14
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Energy Divide (2006-07)Propor�on of Electric Structures
Less than 20%
20-40%
40-60%
60-80%
More than 80%
No MI structures
Figure 8: Es�mated net storage capacity of irriga�on tanks and surface water bodies in PMKSY target districts
1 dot - 10 MCM
Tank storage capacity (CCA*5000m³)
Tank Density
5. Accelerated Irriga�on Benefits in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh post-2000
Post-2000, India has witnessed some glorious irriga�on successes and disastrous failures. Poli�cs has played a part in
both. Throughout history, India's rulers and overlords have used irriga�on to consolidate poli�cal power. In
contemporary poli�cs, BJP and UPA governments too have been doing it but in sharply different ways. Post-2000,
UPA governments used irriga�on to create a spoils system. In 2004, the UPA government in Andhra Pradesh
launched 1.86 lakh crore Jala Yagnam to irrigate 12 million acres. Eight years later, however, a scathing CAG audit ₹
concluded that there was not much to show for 72,000 crore spent un�l then on Jala Yagnam and pronounced that ₹
its 'benefits are illusory'. The scheme got notoriety as chief minister's Dhana Yagnam. In Maharashtra, similarly, the
Congress-NCP government got mired in a 70,000 crore irriga�on scam in drought-prone Vidarbha that produced no ₹
new irrigated area. Top ministers and their cronies were accused of swindling half the funds spent in the name of
irriga�on.
In Gujarat and MP, BJP chief ministers Narendra Modi and Shivraj Singh Chauhan also used irriga�on as a poli�cal
strategy. But neither is accused of an irriga�on scam. Both Modi and Chauhan directly drove the irriga�on-agriculture
growth agenda. Both their governments ran massive media campaigns claiming personal credit for double-digit
agricultural growth under their stewardship. Both won three successive presiden�al-style assembly elec�ons largely
with support from the agrarian classes. During 2001-2014, they spent nothing like the massive sums blown up on
irriga�on by Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh. Yet, their index of net irrigated area soared while it remained flat for
the two UPA states and for India as a whole (see the chart in Figure 9).
Figure 9: Rapid increase in the index of net area irrigated in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh a�er 2000
Index of Net Area Irrigated from all Sources (2000-01=100)Index of Canal Irrigated area (2000-01=100)
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Andhra Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Gujarat
Maharashtra India
Gujarat
Andhra Pradesh
India
Maharashtra
20
00
-01
20
01
-02
20
02
-03
20
03
-04
20
04
-05
20
05
-06
20
06
-07
20
07
-08
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
20
12
-13
20
13
-14
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
Madhya Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Gujarat
Maharashtra India
Gujarat
Madhya Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
MaharashtraIndia
20
00
-01
20
01
-02
20
02
-03
20
03
-04
20
04
-05
20
05
-06
20
06
-07
20
07
-08
20
08
-09
20
09
-10
20
10
-11
20
11
-12
20
12
-13
20
13
-14
The accuracy of land use data on irrigated area is o�en ques�oned but Figure 10 presents remote sensing
assessment by Gourav Misra of areas cropped in kharif, rabi and summer seasons in Gujarat during 2003-04 and
2010-11. These also show clear evidence of increased cropping intensity, even a�er allowing for some pockets of
higher rainfall in the la�er period. Thanks to accelerated irriga�on, gross cropped area in Gujarat increased by over
30 per cent in 7 years. Similar was the impact of accelerated irriga�on development in MP too as is evident in Gourav
Misra's remote sensing maps of land cover 'greenness' in the winter of 2009 and 2014 (Figure 11).
How did Modi and Chauhan accelerate irriga�on so successfully in their states? By devising a broad-based mul�-
pronged strategy with single-minded focus on reaching irriga�on to as many farm holdings as possible. Both realised
that big dams and canals are no use unless farmers have year-round, on-farm water control. In improving these, both
also realised the cri�cality of groundwater and quality farm power supply. Under his famous Jyo�gram Yojana, Modi
invested 1,250 crore in rural feeder separa�on to ensure full-voltage, uninterrupted farm power supply for 8 hours ₹
daily to farmers. In power-deficit MP, Chauhan began forward-contrac�ng power purchase from the na�onal grid for
winter season and issued hundreds of thousands of winter-season, 110-day pump connec�ons per year for wheat
irriga�on, MP's main winter crop. These farm power innova�ons alone did much to accelerate irriga�on. Modi (and
his successor chief minister Anandiben Patel) also supported village communi�es to construct 166,000 Check-dams,
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
15
261,785 farm ponds and 122,035 Bori Bunds for irriga�on and groundwater recharge. Gujarat government has
ensured that 2,5000 irriga�on tanks and reservoirs were desilted and deepened over the past decade; and thousands
of tanks have been connected with Sardar Sarovar canals to create a mellon-on-a-wine irriga�on regime. In her two
year rule, Anandiben Patel issued 2.10 lakh farm power connec�ons, brought 4.02 lakh hectares under micro-
irriga�on on 2.51 lakh farm holdings, completed 332 km long Sujalam Sufalam Recharge canal, began piped
distribu�on of Sardar Sarovar canal command in 3.64 lakh ha, and ini�ated 1,150 km SAUNI pipeline project to fill
115 medium-scale reservoirs of Saurastra with surplus Narmada water⁵. In sum, their strategy for Har Khet Ko Pani is:
get water close to the farmer, give her Type II irriga�on structures, and irriga�on benefits will accelerate.
Figure 10: Remote sensing assessment of changes in single, double and triple cropped areas in Gujarat between 2003-04 and
2010-11
Both Modi and Chauhan used improved governance to accelerate irriga�on. Modi revitalised DISCOMs while
Chauhan rejuvenated the irriga�on bureaucracy. Chauhan realised that government canals operate at a quarter of
their poten�al, thanks to poor maintenance and management. He energized his irriga�on department to radically
improve their management. A tough IAS officer as irriga�on secretary and CM's personal handling of local poli�cal
interference helped to tame the anarchy in canal commands. A�er years of decline, government canals began to
operate as they should and water reached tail-ends like it had never done before. Irrigated area in MP's canal
commands increased from less than 1.0 million hectare (mha) in 2010 to 1.56 mha in 2011, to 2.02 mha in 2012, and
2.33 mha in 2013 and 2.83 mha in 2014, which was a drought year!
16
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
⁵h�p://gujara�nforma�on.net/downloads/farmers_agri_201617.pdf
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Gujarat: RS es�mates of increase in cropped area:2003-04 to 2010-11
Area cropped 2003-04 (Million hectares)Area cropped 2010-11 (Million hectares)
11.10
12.50
5.50
9.00
1.402.20
SummerRabiMonsoon
Cropped Area 2010-11Cropped Area 2003-04
MONSOON NDVI-2003
No Crop
Croped
RABI NDVI-2004
PCDI (all year) 2003-04
37.57 150 225 300Kilometer
No Crop
1 season
2 seasons
3 seasons
No Crop
Cropped
Seasonal Cropped Area
SUMMER NDVI-2004
MONSOON NDVI-2010RABI NDVI-2011
No Crop
1 season
2 seasons
3 seasons
Seasonal Cropped Area
SUMMER NDVI-2011PDCI (all year) 2010-11
37.57 150 225 300Kilometer
Annual Rainfall Gujarat
Legend (Rainfall in mm)
586-900
901-1300
1301-1700
1701-2100
2101-2500 0 70 140 280
Kilometers
Figure 11: Remote-sensing images of increase in land-cover 'greenness' in MP between winter 2009 and winter 2014
< 0.2 0.2 - 0.4 0.4 - 0.6 0.6 - 0.8 > 0.8
Jan 2009 Feb 2009 Mar 2009
Jan 2014 Feb 2014 Mar 2014
Government of India's Accelerated Irriga�on Benefits Program (AIBP) needs to take a leaf out of Madhya Pradesh's
book. During Chauhan's first decade, MP government spent a total of 36,689 crore on irriga�on, far less than ₹
Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra had done in that period; yet, MP tripled irrigated area in canal commands (from all
sources) from 0.808 mha in 2006 to 2.5 mha in 2012-13. One might suspect that large increase in canal irriga�on
resulted from new projects commissioned on Narmada. However, as Figure 12 shows, canal irrigated area increased
in all of MP's river basins rather than just Narmada. Figures from MP irriga�on department would be expected to
show rapid increase; but even LUS figures show the rapidly increasing trend in canal irriga�on (Figure 11). Figure 13
compares the irriga�on data for MP compiled by NSSO round #59 for 2002-03 and round #70 for 2012-13. These
too show near doubling of rabi irrigated area from all sources and a near 6-fold increase in canal irriga�on for the
farmers sampled.
Figure 12: Area reported irrigated by public canals in different river basins of MP (2011-12 to 2013-14)
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
17
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
1.136.48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Govt. canals
28.13
5.09
34.35
16.56
0.96
24.00
3.78
34.73
8.20
46.71
21.12
88.00
63.36
3.52
Wells and tubewells Other sources All sources
Kharif 2003 Kharif 2013 Rabi 2003 Rabi 2013
Figure 13: Increase in percentage of cul�vated area under irriga�on by different sources in MP; comparing NSSO Round #59 (2002-3) with NSSO Round #70 (2012-13)
In 2003, government canals in MP irrigated around 0.65 mha. Under Chauhan's prodding, irriga�on inched up. In
2008 assembly elec�ons, Chauhan reaped rich electoral dividends from farmers for his irriga�on policies. So in 2010,
a�er sacking a corrupt irriga�on secretary, Chauhan brought an upright and pushy officer to run the irriga�on
department, with promise of stable tenure and total support in stamping out poli�cal interference in running canals.
This move delivered. The area irrigated by government canals jumped from less than 1.00 mha in 2010 to 1.56 mha
in 2011, to 2.02 mha in 2012, and 2.33 mha in 2013. In 2014, despite being a poor monsoon year, MP expects the
state will have 3.00 mha irrigated in canal commands (by all sources), more than even the poten�al created of 2.83
mha.
How did MP achieve such miraculous expansion in canal irrigated area? Sheerly by improving irriga�on management
involving Principal Secretary and Superintending Engineers down to 'chawkidars'. The top poli�cal and administra�ve
leadership implemented reforms by making performance-linked demands (PLD) on the bureaucracy and offered
performance-linked supports (PLS) so that the department could rise to the challenge. The PLD-PLS strategy involved
six components:
[1] Restoring canal management protocol: MP restored the primacy and insisted on full enforcement of four forgo�en
rules of effec�ve canal system opera�on viz., ra�onalized irriga�on schedules, tail-to-head irriga�on, osarabandi
(opera�ng canals by strict rota�on) and opera�ng canals at full-supply level (FSL). Obsolete irriga�on schedules
were revised. Water allowances were adjusted to reflect new cropping pa�erns. Areas served by li� irriga�on
from surface and groundwater in command areas began to get counted as canal irrigated areas. Irriga�ng tail-end
first removed the head-tail inequity endemic to canal irriga�on. FSL canal opera�on meant that water reached
tail-ends and could be distributed in an orderly manner. Enforcing osarabandi ensured that distributaries could be
operated at FSL during their rota�ons. The most difficult of all, in early years, was enforcing the 'tail-end first' rule
because it challenged the long-entrenched power rela�ons. In some projects, tail-end farmers were asked to
complete land prepara�on a week or so in advance so that water could be released in advance when head-end
farmers were not ready. Restoring the primacy of 'tail-end-first' required a massive thrust but once it got
accepted, things began to fall in place; farmers adjusted plan�ng schedules; water demand in head began lagging
that in tail. Earlier, when canals ran non-stop at low-supply, it was a winner-take-all game for head-end farmers
who had no pressure to �me plan�ng or save water. Now, osarabandi delivers full-supply for specific pre-
determined �me slots that drives farmers to manage water be�er. Over �me, there is greater apprecia�on among
18
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
farmers for the discipline of 'tail-end-first' irriga�on and osarabandi since with greater discharge of water, the
fields are irrigated faster saving the farmer �me and labour.
[2] Last mile investments: To enforce the three core-rules requires that systems are well-maintained and in good
repair. A World Bank loan and internal resources were found to priori�se and quickly complete last-mile projects
with high poten�al. Lining big earthen canals on old systems helped reach water to tail ends quickly. Small
investments in rehabilita�ng over 4000 Minor Irriga�on Schemes doubled the area served by them in just two
years from 367,000 hectares to 7,60,000 hectares.
[3] Reducing deferred maintenance: Canals can be operated at FSL only if they are regularly maintained and will not
breach. In most states, a�er salaries are paid, irriga�on departments are le� with no resources for Management,
Opera�on and Maintenance (MO&M). In MP, the department was provided resources to undertake proper
MO&M. Two months ahead of every irriga�on season, the department would be mobilized to desilt and clean all
main canals while Water User Associa�ons (WUAs) cleaned sub-minors and field channels. Even then, in older
systems, risks of canal breach remained. Engineers were enjoined to run FSL and, if they occurred, fix the
breaches within a stringent �me limit; in doing so, they were backed by the department bosses.
[4] Constant Monitoring: The hallmark of new management was relentless monitoring. Poten�al created was taken as
the target for irriga�on. Regular weekly video-conferences taken by the Secretary and newly introduced ICT
systems created pressure for performance. The long abandoned prac�ce of engineers overseeing irriga�on
opera�ons in the field got revived with the secretary and chief engineer themselves frequently heading out in the
field. Irriga�ng tail-end areas became an obsession and from the Secretary down, the key variable monitored was
whether tail-end fields were watered. In a masterful innova�on, the Engineer-in-Chief would randomly call any of
the 4000 odd mobile numbers of tail end farmers to enquire if water reached her/his field.
[5] Anima�ng the irriga�on bureaucracy: Uns�nted support of the chief minister empowered the irriga�on
bureaucracy to establish order and rule of law in canal commands. Local poli�cal interference was firmly crushed,
when needed with direct interven�on from the chief minister. This had magical effect on the department's
morale which was further enhanced by a new system that recognized and felicitated high performing staff. The
Chief Minister's backing also made coordina�on with agriculture, forest, revenue departments and district
collectors easier, quicker and result-oriented. Time-consuming peripheral issues were declu�ered. An
invigorated irriga�on bureaucracy was focused on the core task of delivering water to as many farmers as
possible especially in the tail-ends.
[6] Vitalizing farmer organisa�ons: Under a new law made in 1999, some 2000 WUAs were formed but mostly lay
defunct. WUAs' had li�le role when poorly managed main system failed to deliver water to many parts of the
command for years. Now that the MO&M of the main system improved, water began reaching the tail-ends and
defunct WUAs sprung to life. By involving them in pre-rabi desil�ng of minors and sub-minors, the department
enhanced its outreach and WUAs became cri�cal partners in irriga�on scheduling, maintenance below outlets
and orderly water distribu�on.
Type I irriga�on development strategy of central and state governments has all along emphasized only construc�on
to the total neglect of Management, Opera�ons and Maintenance (MO&M) of MMMIPs. This is the key reason for
the widening gulf between Irriga�on Poten�al Created (IPC) and Irriga�on Poten�al U�lised (IPU). Central share in
MMMIP is just around 15 per cent of total investment in MMMIP, with states contribu�ng 85 per cent. Given that
central government has no means to compel state governments to devote greater energy and funds to improve
MO&M of MMMIPs, it makes much greater sense for PMKSY to devote central funds only to incen�vize state
governments for MO&M improvements in public irriga�on systems and leave it to states to find resources for
19
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
construc�on, especially with greater devolu�on of funds to states under XIV Finance Commission report. Many
states with large MMMIPs have starved their irriga�on departments of funds, professional staff and capacity building
even as they spend massive sums in new construc�on. This is an old syndrome of India's MMMIP. David Seckler had
remarked 40 years ago that, “As the rug of irriga�on development is rolled out ahead through construc�on of new
facili�es, it will roll up behind through poor maintenance and management of exis�ng facili�es” (cited in Wade 1984, 286).
There is li�le the Central Government can do to fight this syndrome because MMMIPs are managed by state
Irriga�on Departments. However, what it can do is encourage and incen�vize irriga�on management improvements
by spreading word about innova�ons and best prac�ces that have succeeded elsewhere. The abandoned XII Five
Year Plan had created a NIMF under which central government had offered to reimburse state irriga�on departments
for all Irriga�on Service Fee (ISF) they collected from farmers on a 1:1 basis, and for ISF collected through WUAs on a
1: 1.3 basis provided resources so mobilised were made available to respec�ve irriga�on systems and WUAs for
improving MO&M and level of irriga�on service. The underlying thinking was that such an incen�ve scheme would
restore the accountability loop between farmers and irriga�on department staff that have got eroded due to free or
subsidized irriga�on policies that have taken root in all states. NIMF needs to be the core of AIBP in PMKSY.
20
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
6. New Opportuni�es for Type II Irriga�on: The Promise of the Solar Pump
A major opportunity for expanding and sustaining Type II irriga�on in our target geography that PMKSY has ignored
is the promise of solar irriga�on pumps. For a long �me, solar pump has been tried on research farms; but now, the
falling costs of panels are mainstreaming the technology. Un�l 2012, India had less than 1000 solar pumps; but at
the end of 2015, we already had 35,000. The numbers are expected to grow in geometric progression because solar
pumps overcome key pi�all of diesel pumps, viz., high fuel cost, and of subsidized grid power, viz., frequent
interrup�ons, low voltage and 6-7 hours of mostly nightly supply. Solar pumps, in contrast enjoy 7-9 hours of
uninterrupted, reliable, day�me power free of opera�ng cost (Figure 14). Being off-grid, they are also easier to install
and require li�le maintenance. As panel prices fall with market expansion, solar pumps can be expected to make
deeper inroads in our Type II irriga�on economy.
Solar pumps can be a boon for our energy-scarce
districts which have ground and surface water
available for Type II irriga�on development. Most
of these districts have low grid-penetra�on; as a
result, prospects of reaching grid power for Type II
irriga�on any �me soon are small and distant.
Even when villages are connected to the grid,
connec�ng individual tubewells/wells with grid
entails capital investment of the order of 2.0-2.5 ₹
lakh. Even though solar panels are expensive in
absolute terms, a solar pump is a cost-effec�ve
alterna�ve to a grid-connected pump if
connec�on costs are included in the cost of
energizing a structure. Districts in Bihar,
Chha�sgarh, eastern U�ar Pradesh, Orissa,
Assam, MP and Jharkhand—in sum, much of the
irriga�on-deprived geography—have 153 pump-
sets per 1000 ha of net sown area, most suffer
from low opera�ng factor because of high cost of
diesel and fuel that drive 88 per cent of them.
Farmers here use only 500-600 kWh (equivalent)/
hectare of energy in pump irriga�on compared to
2000 kWh/hectare in districts with subsidized
electricity. No wonder farm worker produc�vity
and cropping intensi�es are low in these districts.
As solar pump numbers swell, a major threat is that their owners will mimic the economic behavior of grid
connected pumps with ra�oned free power, but with the addi�onal benefit of be�er quality, day-�me power for
2500-2800 hours/year. The legi�mate fear is that as solar pumps numbers grow, the pressure on groundwater
resources will increase enormously. Governments try to counter this danger by limi�ng subsidy to small-size solar
pumps and making it condi�onal to farmer buying micro-irriga�on system. In Rajasthan, with the largest number of
solar pumps, these condi�ons have already been watered down: under pressure from farmers, solar pump subsidy
has been raised from 2 kWp to 3 kWp and now to 5 kWp. As panel costs fall making solar pumps affordable without
subsidy, these condi�onali�es will any way not alleviate the groundwater threat of solar pumps.
2Figure 14: Global solar radia�on in India (kWh/m )
Source: h�p://www.tnsea.in/solar-energy-in-india.html
21
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
5.4-5.6
5.4
Srinagar
5.45.8
5.6-5.8Jammu
ShimlaChandigarh
5.4
New Delhi
5.4-5.6
LucknowJaipur6.4
6.0-6.26.2-6.4
5.4
5.0-5.2
Gantok4.6-4.8
4.8-5.0
5.4
5.2-5.44.6
Itanagar
Kohima
Imphal5.0-5.2
AizawlAgartala
Kolkata5.4
Bhubaneshwar
5.8-6.0Bhopal
Ahmedabad
5.6-5.8
5.4 5.4-5.6
Patana
Thiruvananthapuram
5.6-5.85.8
Chennai
Bangalore
5.4-5.6
Panaji
Mumbai
Hyderabad
1600170018001850190019502000205021002150220023002305
4.64.6-4.84.8-5.05.0-5.4
5.45.4-5.6
5.85.8-6.06.0-6.26.2-6.4
6.4
5.6-5.8
Global solar radia�on in india
KWh(m2) daily KWh(m2) annual
PMKSY needs to respond to the solar pump's mixed bundle of opportunity and threat in a foresigh�ul manner. The
only way to ensure sustainable water use under solar pumps is to incen�vize farmers to conserve free solar power
and groundwater. This can be done by connec�ng solar pumps to the grid and giving farmers long-term buy-back
guarantee for surplus solar energy at an a�rac�ve feed in tariff. Electricity companies will resist having to buy small
amounts of solar power from individual farmers due to the high transac�on and vigilance costs involved. However, a
cluster of solar pump irrigators brought together in a coopera�ve-owned micro-grid can overcome this resistance.
This concept has been piloted in village Dhundi in Gujarat through a Solar Pump Irrigators' Coopera�ve Enterprise
(SPICE). Such a SPICE presents a win-win game for farmers, for power sector and for sustainable groundwater
management. Farmers get quality power for irriga�on and a stable, remunera�ve market for their surplus solar
energy. DISCOMs can use SPICE to do away with power subsidies and create a smart grid. The groundwater
economy can become more sustainable by doing away with perverse power subsidies and incen�vizing farmers for
conserva�on of energy and water.
In groundwater-rich eastern India, solar pumps can help create compe��ve irriga�on service markets if young
farmers in every village are supported to acquire a 6-8 kWp solar pump and a 1,000 meter buried pipe distribu�on
system to operate as entrepreneurial Irriga�on Service Providers (ISPs). Such ISPs having diesel pumps are already
playing a role in the irriga�on economy of the region but their high water prices put water buyers in a dominant
seriously disadvantageous posi�on. The same ISPs would slash their water prices down if their diesel pumps were
replaced by solar pumps with comparable water output. By expanding a compe��ve market for irriga�on services,
the solar ISP model can accelerate Type II irriga�on development but in some areas result in groundwater over-
development by increasing demand for irriga�on.
The SPICE model has relevance in groundwater-rich districts as well as groundwater-stressed districts. The surplus
energy buy-back guarantee gives solar pump irrigators two op�ons: use it to sell irriga�on service to neighboring
farmers or evacuate it to the grid. In groundwater rich-districts, a low feed-in tariff will strengthen incen�ve to sell
irriga�on service, intensify compe��on on solar ISPs and make irriga�on service available to buyers at affordable
prices. In groundwater stressed districts, a high feed-in tariff for power buy back will raise the opportunity cost of
using solar energy to pump water for own use as well as for selling to others, raise water prices, and force all water
users to conserve water. In sum, the feed-in tariff offered for solar power buy-back will act as a surrogate water
price to signal the scarcity value of water. All perverse impacts that the country has witnessed all these years due to
invidious energy-irriga�on nexus can, in principle, be neutralized by proper promo�on and governance of solar
pumps through SPICE pa�ern.
22
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
7. New Opportuni�es for Type II Irriga�on: Peri-urban Wastewater Irriga�on
Municipal wastewater has been used world over for irriga�on, for a long �me. Around the mid nineteenth century,
'sewage farms' were common in many parts of Europe and United States. For decades, the wastewater (WW) from
Paris was transported in canals for spreading on a 5,000 ha plot which developed into a highly produc�ve vegetable
growing area. The large size and superb quality of the vegetable produce a�racted great interest among farmers and
ci�zens. In India too, evidence of sewage farms exists in and around several ci�es including Amritsar, Delhi,
Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Jamshedpur and Trivandrum. Twenty-five years ago, Strauss and Blumenthal (1990)
es�mated that 73,000 Ha in peri-urban India was subject to wastewater irriga�on; the number is likely to be many-
fold today. IWMI studies in 17 loca�ons es�mate that more than 57,000 hectares of area is being irrigated with
wastewater in that sample of loca�ons alone (see Table 6).
Table 6: Extent of wastewater irriga�on in the periphery of urban centers
Several municipali�es have devised formal and informal arrangements with peri-urban farmers for requisi�oning their
freshwater for municipal use and supplying them wastewater for irriga�on. Rajkot Municipal Corpora�on, for instance,
has been supplying water to two registered wastewater coopera�ves since 1962. Smaller municipali�es like Unjha in
north Gujarat are auc�oning their wastewater to entrepreneurs who then deliver it to farmers. Thus, wastewater
irriga�on is not just common, it is happening everywhere. Driven by freshwater scarcity, growing compe��on from
domes�c and industrial users and rapid urbaniza�on, farmers around the country are embracing wastewater and
benefi�ng from its reliability and nutrient content.
Loca�onNet Wastewater
Irrigated Area (Ha)Source
01.
Gujarat
Ahmedabad 9,450
Palrecha et al. (2012)
02. Vadodara 3,875
03. Rajkot 3,252
04. Gandhinagar 769
05. Bhuj 248
06. Bhavnagar 195
07. Surat 70
08.
Maharashtra
Purandhar LI Scheme 25,498
Ramola et al. (2016)09. Pune 5,580
10. Jalgaon 1,232
11.Jammu & Kashmir
Srinagar 4,227Shaheen (2016)
12. Jammu 1,817
13.Tamil Nadu
Tiruchirapalli 260Leaf Society (2016)
14. Salem 240
15.
Karnataka
Dharwad 210
Gupta et al. (2016)16. Hubli 186
17. Vijaypura 35
TOTAL 57,144
23
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
A 2008 es�mate of sewage generated by class I and class II Indian ci�es (CPCB 2009) shows that more than 38,000
million litres of wastewater is generated every day; annually, this amounts to nearly 14 billion cubic meters (BCM).
This is sufficient to irrigate 2 mha of land, equivalent to 200 medium irriga�on schemes. Unlike canal irriga�on, this
mode of irriga�on does not require any kind of storage; and there are hardly any evapora�on or conveyance losses.
However, to recognize wastewater irriga�on and promote it further, it is essen�al to take cognizance of some
per�nent public health and soil quality concerns.
7.1 Addressing public health and soil quality concerns
Irriga�on with untreated wastewater has raised some public health and soil quality concerns. In wastewater irriga�on
literature and during our fieldwork, we encountered two types of health concerns: [a] direct exposure to untreated
sewage may cause rashes, irrita�on and skin problems for wastewater farmers; and [b] it is widely suspected that
contaminants in wastewater may enter the food chain, especially when farmers use wastewater to grow food crops, in
par�cular leafy vegetables.
Concerns pertaining to direct exposure can be addressed rela�vely easily through awareness campaigns and basic
precau�ons. Farmers using wastewater should be encouraged to implement sieving and se�ling protocols; and should
be advised to wear safety boots and gloves while on the field. For minimizing the indirect exposure risks, several steps
can be taken:
[a] The municipal administra�on should make sure that domes�c wastewater is not mixed with industrial
wastewater;
[b] To be completely safe, farmers may be asked to grow only non-food crops using wastewater;
[c] In cases where food crops are being grown, leafy vegetables and crops that grow close to the ground should be
avoided; and finally,
[d] A systema�c study of the long-term health impacts of consuming wastewater irrigated food crops should be
undertaken.
Our field studies indicate that farmers do not perceive the health risks or risks to soil quality to be very severe.
Despite decades of wastewater irriga�on, few cases of the harmful effects of direct or indirect exposure have been
reported. All farmers unanimously report significant increase in yield and reduc�on in fer�liser costs with chemical
free wastewater use for irriga�on.
7.2 Opportuni�es for PMKSY
How an economy manages its wastewater correlates strongly with its stage of economic development. A global bird's
eye view suggests a ladder of techno-economic op�ons in wastewater treatment; management and reuse (see Figure
15). In most villages of South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, there is hardly any infrastructure for collec�on, aggrega�on
and treatment of wastewater; disposal is without any treatment and at the household level. As villages grow into
towns, rudimentary infrastructure begins to come up for collec�on and aggrega�on of wastewater and disposal
outside the se�lement. However, in many towns and ci�es of the developing world, the infrastructure for collec�on,
aggrega�on and transporta�on is unable to keep up with the rapid growth of the se�lement area. In these
communi�es, wastewater is a huge threat to the environment as well as to peri-urban quality of life. If managed well,
however, wastewater can be a great resource while also minimizing its nega�ve ecological impact. In very high-income
socie�es, urban wastewater is totally recycled by intensive, mul�-stage treatment that low-income socie�es can ill-
afford.
24
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Figure 15: Techno-Economic Ladder of Urban Wastewater Management
The current discourse on municipal water management in India envisages leapfrogging from the current highly
ra�oned public urban water supply to 24/7 supply; from near-zero tariff to a metered tariff regime; from minimal
wastewater treatment to 100 per cent treated wastewater being released into rivers. The discussion is about crea�ng
a world-class, Europe-like systems (where the average household pays about US $1000 per annum for water supply
and sanita�on) for a popula�on where more than 80 per cent cannot even afford to pay 10 per cent of that as service
fee. A more realis�c scenario is that India will go through a long intermediate phase before it reaches this ideal state.
It seems very likely that self-provision, informal markets, and wastewater irriga�on will con�nue to grow in this
phase. The challenge is to create governance regimes that meaningfully integrate the informal economy and public
provisioning into a viable and sustainable system.
7.3 Agenda for Ac�on
Our current wastewater treatment capacity is less than a third of wastewater generated. Further, most treatment
plants do not operate at full capacity owing to poor opera�on and maintenance (O&M) and high running costs. It is
therefore very likely that ter�ary treatment of wastewater for reuse within ci�es will not happen any�me soon. Land
applica�on of wastewater is a well-recognised treatment process which needs to be embraced in policies and urban
development plans. In the medium run, this might also allow us to manage municipal wastewater without inves�ng in
capital and energy intensive treatment plants. Properly managed wastewater irriga�on in peri-urban India offers to:
[1] Add irrigated areas without adding pressure on scarce freshwater resources;
[2] Provide reliable and nutrient rich irriga�on water to farmers, especially during drought years or where
groundwater is of poor quality;
25
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
12
3
4
5
6Ter�ary treated WWrecycled or stored orreleased into nature toenhance ecological flows
In-situ collec�on / absorp�on of WW athousehold level; No sewerage system
Treated WW used for industry orother economic uses
Untreated WW aggregated and releasedinto rivers / natural water bodies
Ter�ary treatedwastewater blendedwith fresh water tosupply homes
Untreated or moderately treated WWused for irriga�on, industry or recharge
Level of Techno-Economic Management
Co
st p
er
Ho
use
ho
ld (
US
$ /
an
nu
m)
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$000
[3] Improve farm incomes by reducing expenditure on fer�lizers and enhancing crop yields;
[4] Co-manage the water and nutrient cycles by returning them to their source;
[5] Alleviate the need for capital and energy intensive wastewater treatment plants;
[6] Reduce environmental pollu�on caused by releasing untreated wastewater into freshwater streams; and
[7] Convert a disposal headache for municipali�es into a valuable resource.
Thus, over the next several decades, wastewater reuse in agriculture offers the best op�on for ci�es to act as smart,
high performance irriga�on systems for peri-urban farmers. A pre-requisite for wastewater irriga�on is that the ci�es
/ municipali�es should have effec�ve wastewater collec�on and aggrega�on systems. Several field pilots can be
taken up as part of PMKSY (see Table 7) to arrive at the best alterna�ves for achieving har khet ko pani.
Table 7: Op�ons for wastewater irriga�on pilots under PMKSY
Wastewater Pilot Treatment Management Delivery
1a. Auc�on; on-demand delivery Primary treatment: Sieving and Se�lement / Stabilisa�on / Aera�on
Pond
Wastewater entrepreneur responsible for
conveyance and delivery
On-demand; through open channels / pipes
1b. Auc�on; rota�onal scheduling of wastewater supply
Wastewater and freshwater supplied
on a rota�on schedule
2a. Reverse Auc�on; on-demand delivery Primary treatment: Sieving and
Se�lement / Stabiliza�on / Aera�on Pond
ULB manages both treatment and delivery
On-demand; through open channels / pipes
2b. Reverse Auc�on; rota�onal scheduling for wastewater supply
Wastewater and freshwater supplied
on a rota�on schedule
3. Horizontal flow constructed wetland (High land-footprint)
DEWATS model
ULB or private en�ty owns, maintains and
manages the treatment facility; treated
wastewater is supplied to farmers for irriga�on
On-demand; through open channels / pipes
4. Ver�cal flow constructed wetland (Low land footprint)
IARI-model⁵On-demand; through open channels / pipes
5. Planned drainage and plumbing for op�mal wastewater irriga�on
Separa�on of grey and black water leading to minimal treatment requirement
On-demand; through open channels / pipes
⁵IARI has developed an “eco-friendly wastewater treatment facility” that uses wetland plants and engineered microorganisms to treat up to 2.2 million liters per day while enjoying low land and energy footprints vis-à-vis conven�onal wastewater treatment plants (See IARI nd.).
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
26
8 . PMKSY: Prac�cal Ways Forward
8 .1 Reality of Indian Irriga�on
When the BJP manifesto for 2014 parliamentary elec�on assured Har Khet Ko Pani, it was widely expected that the
new NDA government will make a fresh start in India's irriga�on thinking based on the sterling experience of BJP-
ruled Gujarat and MP in rapidly expanding irriga�on coverage on a scale that was unprecedented. However, as
conceived now, the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana focuses mostly on converging pre-exis�ng schemes rather
than envisioning a bold new program appropriate to our needs and challenges. To scale out the irriga�on success of
Gujarat and MP post-2000, PMKSY needs to respond to the following aspects of our irriga�on reality:
1. : A�er 67 years of aggressive planning of irriga�on projects, 48.2 per cent Target Irriga�on-deprived Farm-holdings
of our farm holdings are totally deprived of irriga�on from any source. There are spa�al as well as social
imbalances in irriga�on access; our adivasi farmers and adivasi-dominated districts are our irriga�on have-nots.
PMKSY needs to priori�ze rainfed farm holdings' in India's Irriga�on Deprived Geographies and social groups.
2. : But the bulk of our 'Irriga�on Deprived' holdings are concentrated in 126 Focus on Irriga�on-deprived districts
districts of the country where less than 30 per cent of farm-holdings have any source of irriga�on. These contrast
with 170 top districts where over 70 per cent of farm holdings benefit from irriga�on from one source or
another. PMKSY needs to target energies and resources to these districts. In the current design, it does not.
Lion's share of PMKSY allocated to 23 AIBP priority projects, for instance, have nothing for Assam. Bihar,
Karnataka, UP, Rajasthan, Chha�sgarh, Jharkhand, West Bengal which together have a large chunk of our rainfed
farm-holdings.
3. : India's irriga�on strategy has so far targeted expansion of Recognise Changing Role of Type I and Type II Irriga�on
IPC in pockets which can be turned into command areas of MMMIP. These, however, deliver Type I irriga�on for
which there is li�le or no demand. All evidence available shows that since 1990, over 95 per cent of new irrigated
farm holdings have been delivered through Type II Irriga�on from privately owned groundwater wells or li�
irriga�on schemes powered by electricity or diesel. The role of Type I public and community irriga�on schemes is
increasingly to support Type II irriga�on. The year-round, on-demand water control offered by Type II irriga�on
makes small farms far more produc�ve and resilient compared to Type I irriga�on.
4. : With rapidly falling solar panel prices and growing Recognise the Game-Changing Poten�al of Solar Pumps
acceptance among farmers, solar pumps are certain to be a game-changer in India's near-term irriga�on future.
The Modi government has already set ambi�ous targets for renewable energy genera�on; the ques�on is
whether it will also recognize how solar irriga�on pumps can play a cri�cal role in achieving those targets while at
the same �me: [a] incen�vize efficient use of groundwater in water-scarce regions; [b] significantly reduce
irriga�on depriva�on in groundwater-abundant, energy-scarce regions; [c] bring addi�onal, climate-proof income
to farmers; [d] reduce the carbon footprint of India's groundwater irriga�on; [e] reduce the land footprint of
India's solar ambi�ons; and [f] reduce India's farm power subsidy burden.
5. : As India urbanizes, towns and ci�es are emerging as reservoirs Develop Peri-urban Wastewater Irriga�on Poten�al
that release constant, year-round wastewater supply to sustain Type II irriga�on of high value crops on a
perennial basis. According to Central Pollu�on Control Board, our ci�es already release some 14 BCM of
wastewater annually, nearly twice the storage of dam. A lot of this is already in use for irriga�on Sardar Sarovar
with uncertain health impacts for irrigators as well as consumers. With minimal investment in primary treatment
of urban wastewater, it is possible to eliminate these health risks and create a win-win irriga�on economy. Our
target irriga�on-deprived geography is also lowest in urbaniza�on rates; many of its growing towns and ci�es
have yet not begun inves�ng heavily on drainage and treatment. PMKSY needs to be proac�ve in pilo�ng
27
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
drainage investments designed to support in a planned manner treated wastewater irriga�on rather than
retrofi�ng pre-exis�ng drainage systems or allowing unplanned wastewater irriga�on by default.
6. : Type I irriga�on is costly ( 10 lakh/ha) in terms of capital investment, Emphasize Scale, Speed, Cost-effec�veness ₹
takes 20-30 years to commission, is increasingly fraught with land acquisi�on problems and suffers from severe
MO&M problems. In contrast, Type II irriga�on requires lower investment ( 0.5-2.0 lakh/ha), can be ₹
commissioned quickly, needs no land acquisi�on, and can be owned and managed by farmers. It therefore makes
great sense for PMKSY to target rapid expansion of Type II irriga�on.
28
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Geographies Defining aspectNumber of
Districts
Cri�cal Objec�ve/s
Cluster #01Groundwater surplus districts with high share of farm holdings without any source of Type I or Type II irriga�on
112 1
Cluster #02Groundwater-surplus districts where Type II irriga�on is constrained by high energy cost
36 1
Cluster #03Groundwater surplus districts where Type II irriga�on is constrained by inadequate electricity supply
24 1
Cluster #04Groundwater-deficit alluvial districts where Type II irriga�on will further deplete aquifers
103 2, 3
Cluster #05Groundwater deficit hard-rock districts with excessive groundwater deple�on (dark or over-exploited zones)
27 2, 3
Cluster #06 Districts with dense network of MMM systems and large canal irriga�on areas 114 2, 5
Cluster #07Districts with high density of irriga�on tanks, check-dams, and water harves�ng structures
161 2, 5
Cluster #08 Districts with Class I or II towns - 4
Cluster #09Hill districts, mostly in Himalayas, where agro-clima�c condi�ons are not conducive for conven�onal irriga�on
100 6
Cluster #10 Districts with high irriga�on incidence and high agricultural produc�vity 54 -
Cluster #11 Districts with high irriga�on incidence and low agricultural produc�vity 41 -
Cluster #12 Urban and UT districts with li�le agriculture and missing or patchy data 25 -
Table 8: Clustering of Districts for PMKSY Interven�ons
8.2 Objec�ves PMKSY should pursue and their Contextual Fit
Given this reality, PMKSY should be designed to achieve following six objec�ves, in that order of priority:
1. Provide affordable Type II irriga�on access to irriga�on-deprived farm holdings in the country's irriga�on-
deprived geographies;
2. Maximise areal spread of conjunc�ve management of ground water and surface water in command areas of
MMMIP, irriga�on tanks and large water harves�ng structures such as check dams;
3. Enhance efficiency and produc�vity of irriga�on water use especially in groundwater-stressed geographies
through micro-irriga�on and piped-conveyance;
4. Develop integrated peri-urban irriga�on to promote planned wastewater irriga�on as a major Type II irriga�on
solu�on;
5. Improve the financial and ins�tu�onal sustainability of public and community irriga�on systems; and
6. Promote tradi�onal and innova�ve water harves�ng and diversion systems and support spring-shed
development especially in hill agro-ecologies.
29
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Box 8a: Special Focus on Cluster #01
During the 1980's and early 1990's, GoI's Million Wells Scheme offered liberal subsidies and bank loans to small farmers to develop
groundwater-based Type II irriga�on. U�ar Pradesh's “Free Boring Scheme” of the 1980's is the reason eastern and central UP have
high density of shallow tubewells today. The same strategy has also worked to expand irriga�on access in tribal districts of Gujarat
where over the past decade over half a million new power connec�ons were issued specifically to Adivasi and SC groups. The quickest
and most cost-effec�ve way to expand irriga�on in these Cluster #01 districts is through a program to provide Type II irriga�on assets
to poor farm households (Ac�on Item #1).
Our analysis shows that in the 112 most irriga�on deprived districts, there is poten�al for 5.67 million new irriga�on wells with an 3annual yield of 10,000 m /year (see Figure ES.2). Doing this can bring an addi�onal 11.34 mha under irriga�on without in any way
threatening the sustainability of groundwater resources. This would also wipe away the irriga�on depriva�on in these districts, taking
irrigated area from the current 11.6 per cent to 43.3 per cent, making the region at par with the na�onal average. However, at an
average cost of ₹ 50,000 per well, 5.67 million new irriga�on wells would cost ₹ 28,350 crores; an unlikely alloca�on in the current
PMKSY. As a first step, a more realis�c plan would be to budget for 1.0-1.5 million new irriga�on wells in Cluster #01 under PMKSY by
2020.
Jharkhand has used MGNREGA funds to dig nearly 100,000 wells on Adivasi holdings in recent years. The constraint however is that
they all have diesel pumps; and diesel is expensive and troublesome to procure. PMKSY can leverage exis�ng efforts by the Ministry of
Energy and the Rural Electrifica�on Corpora�on to bring electrifica�on to these villages and energize pumps. Complete electrifica�on
is a long-term goal and requires substan�al resources, especially providing electricity connec�ons to remote irriga�on wells. In
contrast, there are opportuni�es to fulfil at least part of future pump electrifica�on demand by subsidizing solar-powered irriga�on
pumps in lieu of electric connec�ons. PMKSY needs to ini�ate a special subsidy-cum-loan solar pump promo�on program for Adivasi
farmers in these districts. Such a program should support off-grid individual solar pumps, grid-connected solar pumps under the SPICE
model, as well as solar ISPs, as discussed in sec�on 6.
Together the million wells and solar promo�on package will add 5.0-7.5 mha to the region's gross irrigated area; and will li� millions of
Adivasi farmers out of poverty. In the short run, such public investments can be reinforced with CSR and philanthropic interven�ons.
Over �me, these will also trigger hundreds, if not thousands, of crores of private investments in Type II irriga�on; reduce distress
migra�on and cause improvements on various socio-economic parameters.
Different district-clusters face different irriga�on-water challenges and require differen�ated program strategies (see
Table 8). There are scores of districts which already have high coverage of Type II irriga�on but face threat of serious
resource deple�on and deteriora�on. These need one kind of response. But there is also a large number of districts
where the spread of Type II irriga�on is s�ll minimal. For example, many districts in Jharkhand or western Orissa fall in
cluster #01 which needs a cri�cal PMKSY interven�on very different from what most districts in Punjab and Haryana
in cluster #04 need. Likewise, irriga�on access in Telangana, Rayalaseema, Karnataka is constrained by an en�rely
different set of factors that need targeted response. Table 8 a�empts a clustering of India's districts according to their
irriga�on challenges and suggest cri�cal objec�ves PMKSY should follow in each cluster.
8 .3 PMKSY Interven�ons
Un�l now, conven�onal irriga�on planning has focused mostly on large surface water development projects that are
capital and land intensive and have long gesta�on periods. Moreover, farmers are increasingly lukewarm to these
because these offer Type I irriga�on while farmers demand Type II. To cater to these differen�ated needs of different
geographies, PMKSY needs to deploy a broader and diversified repertoire of programma�c instruments. We suggest
15 ac�on items as instruments in this repertoire as outlined in Table 9. Not all these have equal relevance to different
clusters; for each cluster of districts, some are cri�cal but others can play a suppor�ve role.
In some of the best irrigated districts of the country, 60-70 per cent of farm holdings have their own wells, pumps
and pipe distribu�on systems or have private or shared li� systems drawing water from a perennial source for Type II
irriga�on. Irriga�on deprived districts, 112 in our Cluster #01, are characterized by a majority of farm holdings lacking
such apparatus for Type II irriga�on. We propose that this cluster be targeted as the primary beneficiary of PMKSY
(see Box 8a).
Table 9: Proposed PMKSY interven�ons
# Ac�on Item Details of ac�vi�es
1Support for Groundwater/ Li� Irriga�on
Targeted support to Irriga�on-deprived farm households to make wells/ borewells and install irriga�on pumps with 500 meters of piped distribu�on system on the lines of Million Wells Scheme during early 1990's
2Affordable, assured power for peak season irriga�on
7-8 hours of assured, uninterrupted, full voltage power supply to irriga�on wells; supply of single season power connec�ons for li� or well irriga�on
3Support to Solar Pump Irrigators' Coopera�ves
Promote grid-connected solar farmers coopera�ves with a�rac�ve power-purchase guarantee in grid-networked areas with high tubewell density and groundwater deple�on
4Support to Solar Pump-based ISP
ISP in groundwater-rich but energy-scarce villages (as in Bihar), promote in each village a group of solar pump-based ISP with a 6-8 kWp solar pump with 1000 meters of buried pipe network
5 Support to Micro-irriga�on GGRC-pa�ern in micro-irriga�on promo�on especially in groundwater-stressed districts
6Closing IPC-IPU gap in exis�ng MMM irriga�on systems
Support for annual pre-monsoon desil�ng of minor and sub-minor canals; lining of main and branch canals; desil�ng of minor and medium reservoirs; last-mile investment in comple�ng incomplete distribu�on system
7Suppor�ng conversion to last-mile piped-canal water supplies
Delivering canal supplies to individual or common sumps for piped irriga�on (à la Indira Gandhi Nahar) or through buried pipe network as in Sardar Sarovar project
8Tank-groundwater conjunc�ve management
Regular desil�ng of irriga�on tanks (as in Telangana's Mission Kaka�ya); removal of encroachment on tank-beds and supply channels; buried pipe supply channels; linking tanks with canals; recharge-sha�s and percola�on tanks
9Water harves�ng and groundwater recharge
Centralized: Sujalam Sufalam, recharge sha�s, recharge tubewells, infiltra�on wells Decentralized: Anicuts, �ny check dams, farm ponds, well-recharge
10Watershed treatment with accent on groundwater recharge
Shi� focus from stabilizing kharif crop through improved soil-moisture regime to enhanced groundwater recharge for rabi and summer irriga�on by inves�ng in nala-plugs, check dams, percola�on ponds, well-recharge
11Support improved management of main system in MMM projects
Establish tail-end-first irriga�on protocol; operate the canal system at full-supply level; announce irriga�on schedule in advance; enforce rota�onal water supply
12 Opera�onalise NIMFIncen�vize WUA's to vigorously collect Irriga�on Service Fee (ISF); provide resources to Irriga�on Department for regular opera�ons and maintenance of the main system
13Peri-urban wastewater irriga�on
Support pilot projects for safe peri-urban wastewater irriga�on based on primary, eco-friendly treatment
14 Spring-shed ManagementSupport ini�a�ves such as Government of Sikkim's Dhara Vikas program for revival and improved management of mountain springs
15Tradi�onal land and water management systems
Support revival of tradi�onal hill water management prac�ces such as rainwater harves�ng, diversion irriga�on, ice stupas / ar�ficial glaciers etc.
30
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
In cluster #02 and #03 districts, irriga�on access is constrained by affordability and availability of energy. Bihar,
Assam, Eastern U�ar Pradesh, Coastal Orissa, North Bengal are all flush with groundwater but have significant Type II
irriga�on depriva�on mostly because these are dependent on expensive diesel which delivers power at an effec�ve
cost of ₹ 8-10/kWh. This obliges small holders either to avoid irriga�on or to use it sparingly. In Vidarbha, Telangana,
Marathawada, Rayalaseema, much of Karnataka, there is a fairly high density of Type II irriga�on structures
connected to the grid. However, irriga�on here is constrained by erra�c, low-voltage electricity supply.
Table 10: PMKSY clusters of districts and interven�ons
GeographiesCri�cal PMKSY Interven�ons
(Ac�on Item #)Suppor�ve Interven�ons
(Ac�on Item #)
Cluster #01 ①④ ②③⑧
Cluster #02 ②④ ①③⑤
Cluster #03 ②③ ⑤⑧⑨⑩
Cluster #04 ③⑤ ⑦⑧⑨
Cluster #05 ③⑤ ⑧⑨⑩
Cluster #06 ⑥⑦ ⑪⑫
Cluster #07 ⑧⑨ ⑩⑪
Cluster #08 ⑬
Cluster #09 ⑭⑮ ⑨⑩
In conclusion, then PMKSY as designed now is unlikely to ensure Har Khet Ko Pani, leave alone double farm incomes
in five years. Many pre-exis�ng schemes such as AIBP that the current design converges had doub�ul track record
during the UPA regime. In contrast, the current design learns nothing from the outstanding irriga�on successes post
2000 of BJP governments especially in Gujarat and MP where irrigated farm holdings grew at double digit growth
rates.
31
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
Clusters #04 and #05 present altogether different challenges; these are already among the best-endowed with
Type II irriga�on structures but growing water scarcity and groundwater deple�on is reducing their u�liza�on factor.
In Clusters #06 and #07, there is massive opportunity for conjunc�ve management of canal networks and irriga�on
tanks that can greatly expand Type II irriga�on. Cluster #08 offers opportuni�es for systema�c development of
wastewater irriga�on. India's hill districts in Cluster #09 have unique agro-clima�c condi�ons where conven�onal
irriga�on development might not be prac�cal. In these districts, tradi�onal land and water management prac�ces,
innova�ons like ice stupas in Leh and spring-shed management need to be promoted.
Clusters #10 consists of 54 districts that have high irriga�on coverage and high agricultural produc�vity. These
districts have li�le to gain from PMKSY in terms of irriga�on expansion but they highlight the poten�al contribu�on
that irriga�on can make in boos�ng a district's agrarian economy. Cluster #11, on the other hand, consists of 41
districts that too have high irriga�on coverage but have agricultural produc�vity below na�onal average. These
districts too probably cannot benefit much from PMKSY but they underscore the fact that irriga�on alone cannot
guarantee high produc�vity. Cluster #12 is the residual cluster and includes city districts (like Hyderabad, Mumbai
etc.), urban / UT districts (like Daman, Diu, Chandigarh etc.) and island districts (such as Lakshadweep, Andaman and
Nicobar).
8 .4 PMKSY: Prac�cal Ways Forward
Table 9 outlines the contours of a PMKSY strategy designed to make significant progress along all six objec�ves in a
5-7 year �me horizon. Indeed, the most cri�cal objec�ve of providing basic Type II irriga�on access to a majority of
India's irriga�on-deprived farm holdings can be achieved in 2-3 years in a campaign mode. More difficult and �me-
consuming may be objec�ves 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Table 10 iden�fies from our 15 ac�on items those which are most
cri�cal for each cluster of districts. In addi�on, it also suggests suppor�ve ac�on items that will enhance the
effec�veness and sustainability of the cri�cal ac�on items for each cluster.
In order to ensure Har Khet Ko Pani, PMKSY should stop chasing irriga�on poten�al crea�on under Type I irriga�on
projects. Since states contribute over 85 per cent of capital investment in MMMIP and neglects their MO&M, it
makes sense for the PMKSY to use the central funds primarily to improve MO&M of MMMIP. Moreover, the biggest
near term priority for PMKSY should be to accelerate provision of Type II irriga�on access to some 67 million of
India's 138.5 million farm holdings that have no irriga�on from any source. Even among these, we need to first
concentrate on reaching out to rainfed farm holdings in pre-dominantly rainfed districts. Rainfed farm holdings in
irrigated districts can generally purchase Type II irriga�on and save their crops. But rainfed farmers in predominantly
rainfed districts do not even have that op�on. This calls for focussing energy and resources in 112 cluster #01
districts. This priority can be met in a 3-5 year campaign to provide Type II irriga�on assets to these. However, these
households are mostly Adivasi, are concentrated in tribal-dominated states, and have not coalesced into vocal
demand systems. It is important to remember that even in 112 cluster #01 districts, what type II irriga�on systems
are there at present are owned mostly by non-adivasi farmers. These can get Type II irriga�on access only if their
state governments can implement boldly targeted plans to implement a strategy to provide them year-round, on-farm
water control quickly.
There is also need to rethink where to make investments if the idea is to target irriga�on have-nots. Quick results for
Har Khet Ko Pani are possible only by targe�ng farm holdings rather than dams and canal systems. Again, Gujarat and
MP have exemplified how to target farm holdings for immediate water control rather than mega–schemes with
distant and uncertain irriga�on benefits. If PMKSY remains driven by AIBP and 'per-drop-more-crop', it is certain that
India's irriga�on-deprived geography will be le� with only watershed development programs. Doing these well will
help stabilize kharif crops; but it will leave Adivasi farmers deprived of the full benefits of year-round, on-farm water
control. For that, PMKSY must rapidly expand Type II irriga�on in clusters #01, #02 and #03 with groundwater
development, solar pumps, wastewater irriga�on, MAR, piped water delivery, micro-irriga�on and conjunc�ve
management of water from rain, canals, tanks and groundwater.
8.5 PMKSY: Implementa�on, Monitoring and Evalua�on
As with any program of this size, implemen�ng PMKSY will be a managerial challenge. If the district irriga�on plans
are any indica�on, states and districts are likely to draw up unrealis�c plans which will be impossible to implement
with the given resources and within the 2015-2020 �me frame. The central administra�on of PMKSY will have to
make some hard choices in priori�zing investments and giving a realis�c shape to district plans. There is also a real
danger of mul�ple levels of overlaps with on-going central and state schemes as well as other donor-driven programs.
For instance, as PMKSY district plans are being prepared, the GoI is also developing an ambi�ous US$ 1 billion
Na�onal Groundwater Management Improvement Program (NGMIP) in partnership with the World Bank. Given that
NGMIP will focus on groundwater over-exploited regions and focus on community-based demand management, it
might be be�er to link the 'per drop, more crop' component with NGMIP, rather than PMKSY. Likewise, the Bharat
Rural Livelihood Founda�on (BRLF), set up in 2013 with the objec�ve to “foster and facilitate civil society ac�on in
partnership with government for transforming the livelihoods and lives of people in areas such as the Central Indian Adivasi
belt”, can be a useful partner for targe�ng Cluster #01 under PMKSY.
Emphasis on scale, speed and cost-effec�veness will require transparency in transac�ons and opera�onal flexibility in
implementa�on at the ground level. Involvement of donors, CSR, CSOs and grassroots NGOs can help in effec�ve
program implementa�on, monitoring, review and evalua�on. For instance, in Cluster #01 districts of central India, the
Tata Trusts have set up CInI (Collec�ves for Integrated livelihood Ini�a�ves) which works with a large network of
grassroots organisa�ons to promote agriculture-based tribal livelihoods. Similarly, Arghyam, a public charitable
founda�on set up by the Nilekanis is working with a large network of NGOs and CSOs in the hill districts of India
(Cluster #09) on an ini�a�ve to revive Springs. Partnerships between PMKSY and such ins�tu�ons can leverage
useful synergies with their programs.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
32
References
Chand, R., Raju, S.S., Garg, S. and Pandey, L.M. 2011. Instability and regional varia�on in Indian agriculture. New Delhi: Na�onal
Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NCAEPR).
CPCB. 2009. Status of water supply, wastewater genera�on and treatment in Class-I ci�es and Class-II towns of India. Central for
Pollu�on Control Board (CPCB), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
GoI. 2014. Fourth Census of Minor Irriga�on Schemes Report. November, 411p. New Delhi: Minor Irriga�on (Sta�s�cs) Wing,
Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvena�on, Government of India (GoI).
Gupta, M., Ravindra, V. and Palrecha, A. 2016. Wastewater irriga�on in Karnataka: An explora�on. IWMI-Tata Water Policy
Research Highlight, 4.
IARI. nd. Engineered wetland technology based eco-friendly wastewater treatment and re-use. Water Technology Center, Indian
Agricultural Research Ins�tute (IARI).
Jagadeesan, S. and Kumar, M.D. 2015. The Sardar Sarovar Project: Assessing Economic and Social Impacts. New Delhi: SAGE
Publica�ons.
Leaf Society 2016. Wastewater irriga�on in Tamil Nadu. Unpublished dra� report, Anand: IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program.
Palrecha, A., Kapoor, D. and Maladi, T. 2012. Wastewater irriga�on in Gujarat: An explora�on. IWMI-Tata Water Policy Research
Highlight #30, Anand: IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program.
Ramola M., Palrecha, A. and Gupta, M. 2016. Wastewater irriga�on in Maharashtra. Unpublished dra� report, Anand: IWMI-Tata
Water Policy Program.
Shaheen, F. 2016. Wastewater irriga�on in J & K. Unpublished dra� report, Anand: IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program.
Strauss, M and Blumenthal, U J. 1990. Human waste use in agriculture and aquaculture: U�liza�on prac�ces and health perspec�ves.
Interna�onal Reference Centre for Waste Disposal, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Wade, R. 1984. Irriga�on Reform in Condi�ons of Populist Anarchy: An Indian Case. Journal of Development Studies 14(2):
285–303.
33
34
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
ANNEXURE A1: Clustering of Districts
With its diverse geography, hydrogeology and socio-economic condi�ons, different parts of the country face different
problems in sustainably accessing water resources for produc�ve uses in agriculture. This means that a 'one-size-fit-all' thdesign cannot work for any na�onwide program. Based on data from the 9 Agricultural Census (2010-11) and the
Minor Irriga�on Census (2006-07), we have compiled a list of 590 districts and divided them into 12 clusters as
shows in Table A.1.
Table A.1: Clustering of Districts for PMKSY Interven�ons
Each cluster represents a set of districts that exhibit a par�cular characteris�c. In this , we explain how we sec�on
have iden�fied districts in each cluster.
Geographies Defining aspectNumber of
Districts
Cluster #01Groundwater surplus districts with high share of farm holdings without any source of Type I or Type II irriga�on
112
Cluster #02 Groundwater-surplus districts where Type II irriga�on is constrained by high energy cost 36
Cluster #03Groundwater surplus districts where Type II irriga�on is constrained by inadequate electricity supply
24
Cluster #04 Groundwater-deficit alluvial districts where Type II irriga�on will further deplete aquifers 103
Cluster #05Groundwater deficit hard-rock districts with excessive groundwater deple�on (dark or over-exploited zones)
27
Cluster #06 Districts with dense network of MMM systems and large canal irriga�on areas 114
Cluster #07 Districts with high density of irriga�on tanks, check-dams, and water harves�ng structures 161
Cluster #08 Districts with Class I or II towns -
Cluster #09Hill districts, mostly in Himalayas, where agro-clima�c condi�ons are not conducive for conven�onal irriga�on
100
Cluster #10 Districts with high irriga�on incidence and high agricultural produc�vity 54
Cluster #11 Districts with high irriga�on incidence and low agricultural produc�vity 41
Cluster #12 Urban and UT districts with li�le agriculture and missing or patchy data 25
Cluster #01: Most Deprived, Groundwater Surplus Districts (112)
The agricultural census (2010-11) provides data on
irrigated and unirrigated holdings in each district. From
the 590 districts in the country, we first picked out the
192 most irriga�on deprived districts, i.e. districts which
have the least propor�on of holdings with access to any
irriga�on – Type I or Type II. Among these districts, none
have more than 30 per cent of their holdings as irrigated.
Since hill ecosystems might not be conducive for
conven�onal irriga�on development programs, we
decided to separate them into a different cluster (see
Cluster #09). A few others among the 192 were urban
districts, islands or union territories that have limited
agriculture and patchy or missing data (Cluster #12).
A�er removing these, we arrived at 126 most irriga�on
deprived districts. Of the 126, we further excluded 14
districts where groundwater development is already
more than 80 per cent and where further development
of groundwater-based irriga�on would lead to deple�on.
The remaining 112 districts form this cluster as “most
irriga�on-deprived, groundwater surplus districts”.
Cluster #02: Groundwater Surplus; High Pump Density; Type II Irriga�on Constrained by High Energy
Cost (36)
Much of the irriga�on-deprived districts in Cluster #01
have sparse irriga�on infrastructure. However, there are
also districts that have abundant groundwater and
rela�vely high density of groundwater structures but
li�le Type II irriga�on. Irriga�on development in these
districts is constrained not by physical resource scarcity
but by the high cost of energy. One would expect to find
such districts in eastern India where rural electricity grids
are o�en missing and farmers are forced to rely on
expensive diesel to operate their irriga�on pumps.
For reasons discussed above, we excluded Cluster #09
and Cluster #12 districts from the 590 district dataset;
we then selected districts that have more than 12
groundwater structures per 100 hectares of NSA
(na�onal average: 14); less than 20 per cent electric
pumps; and less than 50 per cent irrigated farm holdings.
The cluster of 36 districts thus formed is Cluster #02.
The districts in this cluster can benefit most through
interven�ons that ensure a reasonably priced and
reliable energy source for irriga�on.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
35
Figure A.1: Cluster #01 (112 Districts)
Figure A.2: Cluster #02 (36 Districts)
Cluster #03: Groundwater Surplus; High Pump Density; Type II Irriga�on Constrained by Inadequate
Electricity Supply (24)
Like in the case of Cluster #02, there are districts in
peninsular India that have high density of groundwater
structures and the poten�al to further develop
groundwater (Type II) irriga�on but less than 50 per cent
of their farm holdings are irrigated. These districts are
constrained due to inadequate hours of electricity supply
or due to the poor and erra�c farm power delivery
regime.
As earlier, we begin by removing mountain and urban
districts (Clusters #09 and #12) . We then selected
districts that have more than 12 groundwater structures
per 100 hectares of NSA); more than 80 per cent
electric pumps; and less than 50 per cent irrigated farm
holdings. The cluster of 24 districts thus formed is
Cluster #03. These districts would immensely benefit if
the rural power supply environment was to improve or if
they had access to be�er quality and quan�ty of farm
power.
Cluster #04: Groundwater Deficit Alluvial Districts (103)
Several districts in the western Indo-Gange�c basin are
using deep, fossil groundwater. These districts are
characterised by low to medium rainfall, free or highly
subsidized farm power supply, moderate to high density
of deep tubewells and nega�ve or near-nega�ve
groundwater balance.
As earlier, we begin by removing mountain and urban
districts (Clusters #09 and #12) . We then selected
districts that have more than 80 per cent groundwater
development. From these, we select alluvial districts in
the north and north-western states of Punjab, Haryana,
western UP, Rajasthan, MP and Gujarat. The cluster of
103 districts so formed is Cluster #04. Any Type II
irriga�on development in these districts will lead to
further groundwater deple�on. Thus, the focus of
interven�ons here needs to be on improving water use
efficiency and making groundwater irriga�on more
sustainable.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
36
Figure A.3: Cluster #03 (24 Districts)
Figure A.4: Cluster #04 (103 Districts)
Cluster #05: Groundwater Deficit hard-rock Districts (27)
Like in Cluster #04, there are similarly characterised
districts in hard-rock districts of peninsular India too that
have nega�ve groundwater balance.
As earlier, we begin by removing mountain and urban
districts (Clusters #09 and #12) . We then select districts
that have more than 80 per cent groundwater
development. From these, we select hard rock districts in
the peninsular Indian states of Maharashtra, Andhra
Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The cluster of 27
districts so formed is Cluster #05. The focus of
interven�ons here too needs to be sustainable
groundwater management.
Cluster #06: Districts with Dense MMM Network (114)
As we discussed, much of India's public irriga�on
investments have gone in crea�ng Type I irriga�on
infrastructure. Type I irriga�on is concentrated in small
pockets of canal command area and there are very few
districts outside Punjab and Haryana where more than
50 per cent of the farm holdings receive canal irriga�on.
In order to capture districts with dense network of
MMM network, we begin by removing mountain and
urban districts (Clusters #09 and #12). We then select
districts that have more than 20 per cent farm holdings
receiving canal irriga�on. The cluster of 114 districts
thus formed is Cluster #06. These districts have immense
scope for improving the gap between IPC and IPU as
well as interven�ons that would improve conjunc�ve
management of surface and groundwater resources.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
37
Figure A.5: Cluster #05 (27 Districts)
Figure A.6: Cluster #06 (114 Districts)
Cluster #07: Districts with High Density of Irriga�on Tanks and WHS (161)
Peninsular India is well-known for its dense network of
cascading irriga�on tanks. The combined culturable
command area (CCA) of India's irriga�on tanks adds up
to nearly 7 mha; of these, nearly 6 mha is concentrated
in 150 districts.
As earlier, we begin by removing mountain and urban
districts (Clusters #09 and #12). We then arranged the
districts in descending order of tank CCA and selected
the top 150 districts. To these, we added the districts of
Kerala that were not already included in the top 150. We
did so because Kerala has a dense network of mul�-
purpose ponds and village water bodies that are not
designated specifically for irriga�on. The cluster of 161
districts thus formed is Cluster #07. These districts have
immense poten�al for interven�ons to improve tank-
groundwater conjunc�ve management.
Cluster #08: Districts with Class I and II Towns
India already has more than 50 million+ ci�es and rapidly
urbanizing. As villages become towns; and towns turn
into ci�es, India's wastewater genera�on – already
es�mated to be around 15 BCM will con�nue to grow.
Wastewater irriga�on is already happening by default on
a large scale and millions of farmers are benefi�ng from
nutrient-rich, reliable supplies. With minimal, smart
investments, it is possible to convert municipal
wastewater into a nutrient-rich, year-round reliable
source of irriga�on for peri-urban farms.
It is difficult to quan�fy the poten�al for wastewater
irriga�on at the district level; hence, we do not define
Cluster #08 by selec�ng specific districts.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
38
Figure A.8: Cluster #08 Districts having poten�al for WW use (175)
Figure A.7: Cluster #07 (161 Districts)
Cluster #09: Hill Districts in Eastern and Western Himalayas (100)
India's mountain geographies have a unique agro-
ecosystem characterised by tradi�onal water
management prac�ces, decentralized water harves�ng,
diversion-based irriga�on and community management
of land and water resources including springs and water
bodies. These regions, especially in eastern and
peninsular India have high value planta�on agriculture
that is mostly dependent on rain water but requires
some irriga�on in cri�cal moisture stress period.
We iden�fy the districts in this cluster by including the
en�re hill states of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh,
U�arakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. To these, we
add 3 hill districts in Assam (Chachr, N.C Hills and Karbi
Anglong), Darjeeling (West Bengal), Idukki and Wayanad
(Kerala) and Coorg (Karnataka). The cluster of 100
districts thus formed is Cluster #09.
Cluster #10: Districts with High Irriga�on Incidence and High Produc�vity (54)
Taking Type I and Type II irriga�on together, there are
only about 150 districts in India where more than 70 per
cent of the farm holdings are irrigated.
We define Cluster #10 as the group of 54 such districts
where more than 70 per cent farm holdings are irrigated
and where agricultural produc�vity per hectare exceeds
₹ ₹ 50,000 (na�onal average: 27,522).
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
39
Figure A.10: Cluster #10 (54 Districts)
Figure A.9: Cluster #09 (100 Districts)
Cluster #11: Districts with High Irriga�on Incidence but Low Produc�vity (41)
Similarly, there are about 40 districts where agricultural
produc�vity per hectare is low despite high incidence of
irriga�on. These districts are unlikely to improve their
agricultural produc�vity by adding more farm holdings
under irriga�on but may benefit from other development
programs.
Like in Cluster #10, for Cluster #11, we select districts
with more than 70 per cent irrigated farm holdings but
agricultural produc�vity per hectare less than 30,000 ₹
(na�onal average: 27,522).₹
Cluster #12: Urban and UT Districts (25)
Finally, we classify 25 urban districts, islands and union territories under Cluster #12. These districts have li�le or no
agriculture and agriculture and irriga�on data for these districts is either missing or very patchy.
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
40
Figure A.11: Cluster #11 (41 Districts)
Pa
ram
ete
r
Clu
ste
r #
01
Clu
ste
r #
02
Clu
ste
r #
03
Clu
ste
r #
04
Clu
ste
r #
05
Clu
ste
r #
06
Clu
ste
r #
07
Clu
ste
r #
09
Clu
ste
r #
10
Clu
ste
r #
11
Clu
ste
rin
g C
rite
ria
Irr_
H <
30
%
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
Ir
r_H
< 5
0%
GW
_Devt
< 8
0%
Ele
c_W
< 2
0%
GW
S/N
SA
> 0
.12
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
Irr_
H <
50
%
GW
_Devt
< 8
0%
Ele
c_W
> 8
0%
GW
S/N
SA
> 0
.12
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
Allu
via
l aq
uif
er
GW
_Devt
≥ 8
0%
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
H
ard
ro
ck a
qu
ifer
GW
_Devt
≥ 8
0%
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
C
_Irr
_H ≥
20
%
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
To
p 1
50
T_C
CA
+ K
era
la d
istr
icts
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
H
ill s
tate
s +
Hill
dis
tric
ts
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
Ir
r_H
≥ 7
0%
Pro
d_H
a ≥
50
,00
0
≠ C
lust
er
#0
9
≠ C
lust
er
#1
2
Ir
r_H
≥ 7
0%
Pro
d_H
a ≤
30
,00
0≠
Clu
ste
r #
09
≠C
lust
er
#1
2
Nu
mb
er
of
Dis
tric
ts
11
2
36
24
10
3
27
11
4
16
1
10
0
54
41
Nu
mb
er
of
Ho
ldin
gs
26
.85
m
8.0
2 m
10
.89
m
18
.95
m
9.2
1 m
29
.72
m
49
.84
m
5.1
7 m
12
.62
m
11
.58
m
Ne
t S
ow
n A
rea (
mill
ion
he
ctar
es)
3
0.5
7 m
ha
4
.31
mh
a
11
.90
mh
a
35
.57
mh
a 9
.42
mh
a
29
.94
mh
a
45
.67
mh
a
4.2
6 m
ha
1
2.6
2 m
ha
9
.44
mh
a
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Irr
igat
ed
Ho
ldin
gs
1
5.3
5%
2
8.2
4%
3
2.0
9%
7
0.3
9%
4
6.0
2%
7
2.2
2%
4
7.3
0%
3
9.7
9%
8
3.8
9%
8
0.4
1%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Irr
igat
ed
Are
a
11
.55
%
17
.71
%
23
.08
%
53
.43
%
33
.91
%
66
.71
%
32
.66
%
19
.52
%
84
.40
%
74
.81
%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Can
al I
rrig
ate
d H
old
ing
s
4.0
5%
5
.85
%
7.4
3%
1
3.8
6%
8
.98
%
36
.76
%
13
.17
%
12
.75
%
20
.61
%
26
.95
%
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Can
al I
rrig
ate
d A
rea
3
.32
%
5.0
5%
5
.43
%
10
.98
%
7.1
5%
3
4.1
7%
9
.58
% 5
.59
%
22
.39
%
28
.19
%
Leve
l of
Gro
un
dw
ater
De
velo
pm
en
t
0
.32
0
.39
0
.60
1
.31
0.9
9
0
.67
0
.45
0
.16
0.9
9
0
.62
Tota
l Tan
k I
rrig
a�o
n C
CA
1.7
6 m
ha
0.4
5 m
ha
0.5
7 m
ha
0.2
4 m
ha
0.4
1 m
ha
1.3
5 m
ha
5.9
8 m
ha
0.8
7 m
ha
0.1
8 m
ha
0.3
6 m
ha
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral P
rod
uc�
vit
y (R
s/H
a)
Rs.
19
,16
0
Rs.
27
,27
3
Rs.
21
,67
4
Rs.
27
,36
8
Rs.
28
,96
5
Rs.
37
,37
6
Rs.
28
,03
0
Rs.
39
.67
0
Rs.
64
,15
3
Rs.
24
,70
5
Nu
mb
er
of
Gro
un
dw
ate
r S
tru
ctu
res
2.7
3 m
0.7
9 m
2.1
6 m
5.3
9 m
2.3
7 m
4.5
1 m
6.7
9 m
0.0
7 m
2.4
6 m
1.6
8 m
Gro
un
dw
ate
r S
tru
ctu
res
pe
r 1
00
Ha
of
Net
So
wn
Are
a
8.9
4
18
.35
18
.18
15
.15
25
.12
15
.07
14
.86
1.7
5
19
.50
17
.83
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
41
Ab
bre
via
�o
ns
Irr_
H
Pe
rce
nta
ge
irri
gat
ed
ho
ldin
gs
th[S
ou
rce
: 9
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
en
sus
20
10
-11
]th
Irr_
A
Pe
rce
nta
ge
irri
gat
ed
are
a [S
ou
rce
: 9
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
en
sus
20
10
-11
]
C_I
rr_H
P
erc
en
tage
can
al ir
rig
ate
d h
old
ing
sth
[So
urc
e: 9
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
en
sus
20
10
-11
]
C_I
rr_A
P
erc
en
tage
can
al ir
rig
ate
d a
rea
th[S
ou
rce
: 9
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
en
sus
20
10
-11
GW
_De
vt
Leve
l of
Gro
un
dw
ate
r D
eve
lop
me
nt
[So
urc
e: C
GW
B]
T_C
CA
C
ult
ura
ble
Co
mm
and
Are
a o
f Ir
rig
a�o
n T
anks
th[S
ou
rce
: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]
Pro
d_H
a A
gri
cult
ura
l Pro
du
c�v
ity
pe
r H
ect
are
[S
ou
rce
: C
han
d e
t a
l. 2
01
1]
Ele
c_W
P
erc
en
tage
Ele
ctri
c W
ells
an
d T
ub
ew
ells
th[S
ou
rce
: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]
Die
sel_
W
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Die
sel W
ells
an
d T
ub
ew
ells
th[S
ou
rce
: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]
Oth
_W
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Oth
er
We
lls a
nd
Tu
be
we
llsth
[So
urc
e: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]th
NS
A
Ne
t S
ow
n A
rea
[So
urc
e: 9
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
en
sus
20
10
-11
]
kWh
-eq
uiv
En
erg
y C
on
sum
p�
on
me
asu
red
in k
ilo-w
a�-h
ou
r e
qu
ival
en
t u
nit
s th
[So
urc
e: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]
GW
S
Nu
mb
er
of
Gro
un
dw
ate
r S
tru
ctu
res
th[S
ou
rce
: 4
Min
or
Irri
ga�
on
Ce
nsu
s]
Co
mp
ari
son
acr
oss
Clu
ste
rs
Tab
le A
.2: C
om
par
iso
n a
cro
ss 1
0 m
ain
dis
tric
t cl
ust
ers
AN
NE
XU
RE
A2
: D
istr
ict-
wis
e D
ata
ba
se
Sta
teD
istr
ict
S_N
oC
lust
ers
Irr_
HIr
r_A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SA
ND
HR
A P
RA
DE
SH
AD
ILA
BA
D1
1 a
nd
70
.17
Ta
ble
A.3
: Dis
tric
t-w
ise
dat
abase
wit
h k
ey v
aria
ble
s u
sed
fo
r cl
ust
eri
ng
of
dis
tric
ts
0.1
1
0.3
6
23
49
5
19
43
6
0.9
5
58
28
86
15
57
78
90
9
45
76
1
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
AN
AN
TP
UR
2
1 a
nd
7
0.2
0
0.1
3
0.7
9
30
25
0
16
47
7
0.8
3
11
01
74
4
29
04
98
89
9
11
15
66
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
CH
ITT
OO
R
3
3 a
nd
7
0.3
8
0.2
8
0.7
1
71
64
1
32
79
4
0.8
4
37
92
68
52
72
53
52
6
17
95
36
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
CU
DD
AP
AH
4
7
0.4
3
0.2
8
0.5
9
14
89
4
28
31
5
0.7
6
40
33
20
47
22
08
18
9
89
75
8
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
E.G
OD
AV
AR
I
5
6, 7
an
d 1
0
0.7
3
0.6
2
0.2
5
47
09
3
61
51
7
0.7
3
41
99
09
15
97
64
06
4
35
28
0
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
GU
NT
UR
6
6
0.6
7
0.6
2
0.1
9
61
80
54
93
7
0.7
7
63
79
63
91
56
65
17
48
01
3
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
HY
DE
RA
BA
D
7
12
0
.00
0
0
0
0
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
KA
RIM
NA
GA
R
8
6 a
nd
7
0.6
9
0.6
6
0.6
4
41
54
2
34
57
7
0.9
9
51
17
14
35
17
07
44
5
23
49
48
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
K
HA
MM
AM
9
7
0
.51
0.4
2
0
.29
6
29
02
3
61
08
0
.91
4
79
34
5
2
19
63
09
63
6
28
64
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
KR
ISH
NA
1
0
6 a
nd
7
0.7
6 0
.67
0
.36
3
90
22
4
40
69
0
.88
4
69
73
7
11
78
23
53
5
49
15
3
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
KU
RN
OO
L
11
7
0
.31
0.2
2
0.2
8
17
90
2
22
11
5
0.9
0
88
94
27
1
75
93
45
60
6
14
49
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
MA
HB
UB
NA
GA
R
12
1
, 3 a
nd
7
0.2
8 0
.23
0
.45
1
91
91
1
57
04
0
.81
8
30
80
5
74
29
73
75
7
17
97
26
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
ME
DA
K
13
5
an
d 7
0
.35
0.2
6
0.8
3
38
70
6
24
23
2
0.9
5
45
16
68
8
89
06
87
17
1
48
59
0
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
NA
LGO
ND
A
14
3
an
d 7
0
.49
0.3
5
0.5
9
37
19
4
26
87
6
0.9
8
56
24
10
1
15
93
83
60
2
18
59
95
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
NE
LLO
RE
1
5
6 a
nd
7
0.7
6 0
.59
0
.27
9
78
71
3
78
97
0
.89
3
09
34
7
28
63
27
40
5
79
47
6
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
NIZ
AM
AB
AD
1
6
6 a
nd
7
0.6
0 0
.53
0
.69
4
04
33
4
21
67
0
.99
6
72
97
0
64
06
06
36
8
13
85
83
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
PR
AK
AS
AM
1
7
3 a
nd
7
0.3
2 0
.24
0
.28
4
57
63
2
88
85
0
.91
2
36
13
8
24
46
07
04
8
77
64
2
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
RA
NG
AR
ED
DI
1
8
1 a
nd
3
0.2
7 0
.16
0
.70
6
88
5
27
50
8
0.9
3
36
73
39
2
33
60
33
55
7
87
02
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
SR
IKA
KU
LAM
1
9
6, 7
an
d 1
1
0.7
4 0
.66
0
.25
9
43
33
2
87
11
0
.28
3
14
28
2
41
87
08
51
4
59
87
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
VIS
AK
HA
PA
TN
AM
2
0
6 a
nd
7
0.6
7 0
.43
0
.22
9
56
99
3
18
55
0
.55
3
02
53
5
65
55
41
73
3
69
34
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
VIZ
IAN
AG
AR
AM
2
1
7
0.6
4 0
.45
0
.19
1
03
63
2
31
85
1
0.3
6
29
57
40
5
83
63
06
0
44
68
6
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
WA
RA
NG
AL
2
2
7
0.6
3 0
.53
0
.62
9
58
48
3
38
95
0
.92
5
28
16
4
57
86
55
27
9
20
77
61
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ES
H
W.G
OD
AV
AR
I
23
6
, 7 a
nd
10
0
.93
0.9
0
0.3
6
41
67
0
64
60
0
0.9
4
43
97
56
6
04
72
38
64
5
71
41
AN
DM
AN
& N
IKO
BA
R
A
ND
AM
AN
2
4
1
2
0
.00
0.0
0
0
.04
2
08
0.1
2
1
40
67
0
12
78
AN
DM
AN
& N
IKO
BA
R
NIC
OB
AR
S
25
12
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
0
0.0
1
46
3
0
94
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
CH
AN
GLA
NG
26
9
0.3
0
0.0
8
0.0
0
33
63
18
94
5
0.0
0
27
64
0
27
80
0
6
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
DIB
AN
GV
AL
LE
Y
27
9
0.4
8
0.1
0
0.0
0
52
63
1.0
0
63
40
18
96
00
10
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
EA
ST
KA
ME
NG
28
9
0.2
1
0.0
4
0.0
0
85
1
15
39
6
58
94
0
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
EA
ST
SIA
NG
29
7 a
nd
9
0.5
6
0.2
3
0.0
0
22
01
9
18
70
2
21
53
8
12
66
7
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
LOH
IT
30
9
0.2
6
0.1
1
0.0
0
79
70
33
75
4
0.0
7
16
21
4
62
50
0
15
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
LOW
ER
SU
BA
NS
IRI
31
9
0.7
0
0.2
8
0.0
0
68
09
13
76
7
22
42
2
0
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
PA
RU
MP
AR
E
32
9
0.7
3
0.2
7
0.0
1
11
31
0
31
19
4
13
68
5
0
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
TA
WA
NG
33
9
0.1
2
0.0
8
0.0
0
82
1
25
48
5
31
85
15
00
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
TIR
AP
34
9
0.0
2
0.0
2
0.0
0
26
43
81
96
0.2
5
15
22
7
16
80
0
4
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
UP
PE
RS
IAN
G
35
9
0.3
9
0.1
1
0.0
0
93
80
16
15
9
94
35
15
00
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
UP
PE
RS
UB
AN
SIR
I
36
9
0.2
4
0.0
4
0.0
0
37
72
14
43
1
15
57
3
15
00
0
AR
UN
AC
HA
L
WE
ST
KA
ME
ND
37
9
0.1
2
0.0
3
0.0
0
12
11
16
00
8
60
61
15
00
0
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
42
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SA
RU
NA
CH
AL
WE
ST
SIA
NG
38
9
0.5
8
0.2
1
0.0
0
92
69
99
69
22
29
6
46
00
0
AS
SA
M
BA
RP
ET
A
39
1 a
nd
7
0.0
6
0.0
4
0.3
1
16
41
5
25
07
3
0.0
0
33
17
20
31
27
48
09
17
93
9
AS
SA
M
BO
NG
AIG
AO
N
40
1 a
nd
7
0.0
5
0.0
6
0.1
1
14
68
1
24
85
6
0.0
0
67
63
5
73
76
15
7
58
08
AS
SA
M
CA
CH
AR
41
9
0.0
3
0.0
4
0.0
5
80
5
29
72
8
0.0
0
11
53
86
47
93
56
12
AS
SA
M
DA
RR
AN
G
42
1 a
nd
7
0.1
9
0.1
9
0.1
8
36
37
2
23
24
8
0.0
0
10
38
33
23
54
19
19
89
38
AS
SA
M
DH
EM
AJI
43
1
0.0
3
0.0
2
0.0
3
0
20
09
9
0.0
0
67
50
6
17
05
05
1
14
93
AS
SA
M
DH
UB
RI
44
1 a
nd
2
0.1
8
0.1
1
0.4
6
14
39
23
95
5
0.0
0
13
43
49
36
67
82
90
17
12
0
AS
SA
M
DIB
RU
GA
RH
45
1
0.0
1
0.0
8
0.1
2
0
24
93
1
0.0
0
13
94
98
82
09
82
6
50
56
AS
SA
M
GO
ALP
AR
A
46
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.1
6
89
23
26
51
3
0.0
0
80
75
3
12
47
36
64
52
20
AS
SA
M
GO
LA
GH
AT
47
1
0.0
3
0.0
5
0.0
6
19
8
33
59
5
0.0
2
11
90
46
36
14
45
1
19
27
AS
SA
M
HA
ILA
KA
ND
I
48
1
0.0
0
0.0
2
0.0
6
4
34
51
5
0.0
0
50
29
4
30
29
11
12
AS
SA
M
JOR
HA
T
49
1
0.0
2
0.0
2
0.0
7
23
14
29
63
2
0.0
2
12
02
40
43
48
22
0
24
35
AS
SA
M
K
AM
RU
P
5
0
1
0
.03
0.0
2
0
.23
7
66
1
2
56
74
0
.00
1
99
72
1
1
72
10
42
1
9
59
9
AS
SA
M
KA
RB
I AN
GLO
NG
5
1
7 a
nd
9
0.0
0 0
.00
0
.06
2
86
31
2
44
33
0
.00
1
26
39
9
17
26
65
4
6
AS
SA
M
KA
RIM
GA
NJ
5
2
1
0.0
1 0
.01
0
.06
4
65
2
90
37
0
.00
7
60
35
3
76
57
0
61
AS
SA
M
KO
KR
AJH
AR
5
3
1
0.0
2 0
.01
0
.04
3
89
7
25
17
6
0.0
0
86
55
6
24
48
74
8
17
69
AS
SA
M
LA
KH
IMP
UR
5
4
1
0.1
1 0
.09
0
.05
7
20
2
21
88
0
.01
1
00
16
9
23
65
40
4
17
30
AS
SA
M
MA
RIG
AO
N
55
1
0
.19
0.1
8
0.2
5
23
02
1
96
45
0
.00
9
20
11
1
26
49
60
8
52
19
AS
SA
M
NA
GA
ON
5
6
1
0.0
6 0
.04
0
.23
1
29
7
31
30
6
0.0
0
23
56
26
9
73
42
4
12
06
9
AS
SA
M
NO
RT
H
CA
CH
ER
HIL
S
57
9
0
.00
0.0
0
0.1
3
19
70
4
37
26
28
17
1 13
50
0 0
AS
SA
M
SIB
SA
GA
R
58
1
0
.01
0.0
2
0.0
7
22
6
26
68
3
0.0
1
13
68
22
3
00
73
19
2
58
4
AS
SA
M
SO
NIT
PU
R
59
1
0
.01
0.0
7
0.0
6
46
13
2
64
05
0
.02
1
65
14
1
39
32
88
1
24
61
AS
SA
M
TIN
SU
KIA
6
0
1
0.0
1 0
.00
0
.07
0
2
78
05
0
.01
1
04
71
4
48
01
84
4
28
14
BIH
AR
A
RA
RIA
6
1
11
0
.86
0.8
6
0.3
4
0
17
39
9
0.0
0
20
04
63
2
05
56
60
5
67
62
BIH
AR
A
UR
AN
GA
BA
D_B
6
2
6, 7
an
d 1
1
0.8
0 0
.78
0
.24
4
04
91
2
50
23
0
.00
2
18
18
7
25
07
86
57
1
23
12
BIH
AR
B
AN
KA
6
3
No
ne
0
.57
0.3
9
0.3
7
54
12
2
27
87
0
.00
8
22
95
8
65
31
26
8
02
1
BIH
AR
B
EG
US
AR
AI
6
4
1 a
nd
2
0.2
4 0
.16
0
.62
0
4
17
43
0
.00
6
18
13
4
23
26
59
6
14
75
7
BIH
AR
B
HA
GA
LP
UR
6
5
N
on
e
0
.54
0.4
5
0
.34
1
6
3
09
44
0
.00
1
28
27
1
1
91
75
51
2
1
18
28
BIH
AR
BH
OJP
UR
66
6 a
nd
11
0.7
3
0.7
4
0.4
5
60
23
14
4
0.0
0
16
75
54
48
22
78
80
23
67
5
BIH
AR
BU
XA
R
67
6
0.6
4
0.6
5
0.3
6
0
23
63
2
0.0
0
10
87
33
21
41
87
42
18
72
3
BIH
AR
DA
RB
HA
NG
A
68
1
0.0
3
0.0
5
0.5
2
0
33
63
9
0.0
0
16
55
34
15
96
55
89
10
77
6
BIH
AR
GA
YA
69
2
0.4
1
0.3
9
0.4
9
11
53
9
20
36
4
0.0
0
21
81
43
56
43
45
05
27
04
8
BIH
AR
GO
PA
LGA
NJ
70
11
0.8
3
0.7
6
0.5
8
12
20
26
17
8
0.0
0
12
81
65
46
62
66
22
38
68
9
BIH
AR
JAM
UI
71
1 a
nd
2
0.2
1
0.2
3
0.3
9
59
14
17
64
0
0.0
0
15
79
27
16
90
87
04
24
71
4
BIH
AR
JEH
AN
AB
AD
72
No
ne
0.5
2
0.4
5
0.5
8
23
0
23
28
8
0.0
0
55
49
6
36
77
05
23
82
22
BIH
AR
KA
IMP
UR
73
6 a
nd
11
0.7
4
0.7
8
0.3
2
59
01
28
53
7
0.0
0
14
83
55
40
42
89
23
20
99
9
BIH
AR
KA
TIH
AR
74
No
ne
0.5
5
0.6
1
0.5
5
0
35
21
5
0.0
0
16
84
57
42
90
44
04
19
65
3
BIH
AR
KH
AG
AR
IA
75
1 a
nd
2
0.2
6
0.3
2
0.4
6
30
39
95
9
0.0
0
95
36
4
25
57
48
76
24
88
6
BIH
AR
KIS
HA
NG
AN
J
76
No
ne
0.4
5
0.2
9
0.2
8
0
0.0
0
97
57
8
15
63
09
17
76
21
BIH
AR
LA
KH
ISA
RA
I
77
No
ne
0.4
1
0.3
8
0.4
3
4
16
77
6
0.0
0
60
39
4
11
37
31
26
68
87
BIH
AR
MA
DH
EP
UR
A
78
1
0.1
7
0.1
9
0.5
7
0
42
90
8
0.0
0
11
46
51
29
26
74
32
66
45
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
43
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SB
IHA
RM
AD
HU
BA
NI
79
6
0.3
8
0.2
9
0.3
4
10
09
18
27
0
0.0
0
21
91
00
22
83
80
98
12
87
9
BIH
AR
MU
NG
ER
80
6
0.5
5
0.4
8
0.2
9
38
69
36
57
0
0.0
0
24
09
2
14
25
44
06
17
88
5
BIH
AR
MU
ZA
FFA
RP
UR
81
No
ne
0.6
3
0.5
4
0.5
6
0
41
42
8
0.0
0
16
76
07
44
04
37
42
84
00
BIH
AR
NA
LAN
DA
82
No
ne
0.9
6
0.9
3
0.6
6
10
2
33
30
3
0.0
0
17
51
56
77
88
16
96
35
34
1
BIH
AR
NA
WA
DA
83
2 a
nd
7
0.4
9
0.3
9
0.4
3
18
27
3
27
16
0
0.0
0
92
54
7
36
62
32
98
35
11
9
BIH
AR
PA
SC
HIM
CH
AM
PA
RA
N
84
6 a
nd
11
0.8
3
0.7
6
0.2
7
23
98
25
11
2
0.0
0
29
60
91
24
08
29
34
16
82
3
BIH
AR
PA
TN
A
85
2
0.3
8
0.3
0
0.5
5
37
35
32
36
7
0.0
0
23
70
96
76
21
08
21
29
93
0
BIH
AR
PU
RA
B C
HA
MP
AR
AN
86
11
0.7
1
0.5
6
0.4
2
4
23
70
8
0.0
0
26
98
15
0
24
32
2
BIH
AR
PU
RN
IA
87
1
0.0
3
0.0
8
0.4
7
0
24
00
8
0.0
0
18
35
64
52
47
61
02
12
62
7
BIH
AR
RO
HTA
S
88
No
ne
0.4
2
0.4
6
0.3
5
90
1
32
32
1
0.0
0
23
29
44
45
17
17
04
58
29
BIH
AR
SA
HA
RS
A
89
2
0.3
1
0.3
3
0.3
8
72
40
02
5
0.0
0
10
18
47
12
60
77
37
31
89
9
BIH
AR
SA
MA
ST
IPU
R
90
1 a
nd
2
0.1
3
0.0
8
0.5
3
24
30
55
4
0.0
0
16
37
83
76
23
20
56
29
50
5
BIH
AR
SA
RA
N
9
1
N
on
e
0
.60
0.5
7
0
.56
3
39
2
67
90
0
.00
1
44
37
4
5
88
73
73
3
4
11
5
BIH
AR
SH
EIK
HP
UR
A
92
N
on
e
0.5
9 0
.57
0
.54
7
25
0.0
0
44
62
8
95
94
26
7
39
88
BIH
AR
SH
EO
HA
R
93
1
0
0.7
8 0
.69
0
.60
0
5
56
82
0
.00
2
88
19
6
05
81
13
1
04
90
BIH
AR
SIT
AM
AR
HI
9
4
No
ne
0
.53
0.4
5
0.4
6
1
33
04
2
0.0
0
10
73
18
2
07
05
99
8
26
85
7
BIH
AR
SIW
AN
9
5
No
ne
0
.47
0.4
5
0.5
9
18
9
21
26
1
0.0
0
12
67
19
4
88
13
03
3
94
05
BIH
AR
SU
PA
UL
9
6
2
0.4
9 0
.45
0
.36
0
2
26
31
0
.00
1
13
09
0
25
86
65
46
2
69
33
BIH
AR
VA
ISH
AL
I
97
1
0
0.7
3 0
.57
0
.57
3
84
5
30
03
0
.00
1
12
09
6
35
70
25
24
1
66
77
CH
AN
DIG
AR
H
CH
AN
DIG
AR
H
98
1
2
0.9
8 0
.97
0
.00
0
0.9
0
89
2
0
91
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
BA
ST
AR
9
9
1 a
nd
7
0.0
4 0
.02
0
.10
1
75
18
1
19
70
0
.21
3
43
59
9
10
12
08
72
6
71
7
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
BIL
AS
PU
R_C
1
00
6
an
d 7
0
.43
0.3
9
0.4
7
20
27
0
23
52
4
0.3
6
36
83
25
4
98
65
23
2
80
97
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
DA
NT
EW
AD
A
10
1
1
0.0
3 0
.01
0
.04
6
28
9
90
17
0
.10
2
78
11
2
21
51
11
6
11
08
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
DH
AM
TA
RI
1
02
6
an
d 1
1
0.7
9 0
.72
0
.78
1
08
2
26
62
7
0.6
4
13
75
51
1
06
86
23
1
68
83
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
DU
RG
1
03
6
an
d 7
0
.46
0.4
4
0.6
9
19
76
4
22
06
8
0.6
7
55
58
80
5
64
94
50
9
27
21
0
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
JAN
JGIR
-CH
AM
PA
1
04
6
, 7 a
nd
11
0
.83
0.8
1
0.4
2
44
64
4
15
40
6
0.2
1
26
06
52
9
05
02
59
9
27
74
1
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
JAS
HP
UR
1
05
1
0
.10
0.0
2
0.3
5
81
02
1
11
08
0
.02
2
53
75
5
30
87
31
98
2
90
17
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
K
AN
KE
R
1
06
1
0
.24
0.3
1
0
.21
7
09
6
1
63
49
0
.28
1
93
01
3
2
27
94
85
9
8
92
7
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
KA
WA
RD
HA
10
7
1 a
nd
7
0.1
2
0.0
6
0.6
6
16
89
2
11
35
8
0.7
1
20
98
08
18
62
09
40
57
48
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
KO
RB
A
10
8
1 a
nd
7
0.0
7
0.0
5
0.3
2
17
00
52
15
90
0
0.0
8
13
54
98
13
22
70
32
80
88
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
KO
RIY
A
10
9
1 a
nd
2
0.1
7
0.0
3
0.2
3
99
69
15
07
1
0.0
9
10
35
26
83
10
89
6
19
43
9
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
MA
HA
SA
MU
ND
11
0
1 a
nd
7
0.2
5
0.2
5
0.4
7
16
00
7
13
27
7
0.5
4
26
88
24
10
61
85
80
10
15
5
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
RA
IGA
RH
_C
11
1
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
5
0.1
2
0.5
3
63
46
9
16
09
4
0.1
5
27
16
20
38
54
88
47
40
77
4
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
RA
IPU
R
11
2
6 a
nd
7
0.5
7
0.5
3
0.4
3
20
06
5
13
24
7
0.4
4
53
98
23
15
19
62
7
27
72
2
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
RA
JNA
ND
GA
ON
11
3
1 a
nd
7
0.2
5
0.2
2
0.5
8
17
22
0
13
33
4
0.6
2
37
08
99
88
86
25
00
10
83
1
CH
HA
TT
ISG
AR
H
SU
RG
UJA
11
4
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
8
0.0
7
0.2
6
12
41
0
14
24
4
0.1
5
46
19
16
63
59
79
83
63
83
3
DA
DR
A &
NA
GA
R H
AV
EL
I
DA
DR
A A
ND
NA
GA
R H
AV
EL
I
11
5
12
0.0
7
0.0
8
0.2
2
15
0.8
2
19
88
2
25
44
61
62
64
5
DA
MA
N A
ND
DIU
DA
MA
N
11
6
12
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.8
9
0
22
26
94
23
10
52
DA
MA
N A
ND
DIU
DIU
11
7
12
0.0
5
0.0
3
1.1
7
0
50
0
DE
LH
IC
EN
TR
AL
11
81
20
.84
00
0
DE
LH
IE
AS
T_D
11
91
21
.79
00
.00
00
27
7
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
44
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SD
EL
HI
NE
W D
ELH
I
12
0
12
0.0
1
0.1
7
0.9
0
0
0
0
DE
LH
IN
OR
TH
EA
ST
12
1
12
0.0
1
0.0
2
0.8
9
0
0.4
3
17
7
0
54
DE
LH
IN
OR
TH
WE
ST
12
2
12
0.8
1
0.7
9
1.1
2
0
0.9
2
10
30
0
20
63
42
51
44
22
DE
LH
IS
OU
TH
WE
ST
12
3
12
0.8
5
0.8
0
1.4
0
0
0.9
5
10
75
6
71
89
34
1
39
23
DE
LH
IS
OU
TH
_D
12
4
12
0.9
3
0.6
9
1.9
5
17
0.9
9
73
6
18
54
88
6
76
5
DE
LH
IW
ES
T_D
12
5
12
0.9
2
0.8
7
1.5
3
71
0.9
9
12
64
73
58
55
38
3
GO
AN
OR
TH
GO
A
12
6
12
0.5
2
0.4
1
0.3
0
21
02
0.5
8
50
17
9
43
04
81
8
29
95
GO
AS
OU
TH
GO
A
12
7
12
0.5
1
0.3
9
0.2
6
16
28
0.6
9
37
03
5
34
20
93
3
14
28
GU
JAR
AT
AH
ME
DA
BA
D
12
8
6
0.5
1
0.4
6
0.7
8
26
02
19
30
1
0.4
0
57
34
74
72
61
33
53
18
94
6
GU
JAR
AT
AM
RE
LI
12
9
1
0.2
5
0.2
6
0.6
4
16
48
24
32
7
0.4
7
54
85
97
20
64
47
13
6
72
75
5
GU
JAR
AT
AN
AN
D
13
0
10
0.8
5
0.8
1
0.5
2
0
50
85
7
0.8
8
20
75
59
52
67
37
99
85
99
GU
JAR
AT
BA
NA
SK
AN
TH
A
13
1
4
0.5
9
0.5
2
1.0
7
38
45
27
57
7
0.6
1
73
58
75
10
70
92
89
68
79
01
9
GU
JAR
AT
B
HA
RU
CH
1
32
6
0
.40
0.3
5
0
.47
6
0
3
28
27
0
.73
2
77
93
5
2
71
16
35
9
6
21
6
GU
JAR
AT
B
HA
VN
AG
AR
1
33
7
0
.39
0.3
5
0.6
4
14
32
4
28
00
1
0.5
4
51
18
24
2
09
85
82
92
8
49
19
GU
JAR
AT
D
AH
OD
1
34
1
an
d 7
0
.10
0.0
6
0.5
0
35
16
5
14
93
3
0.0
0
20
86
79
3
80
33
78
6
36
16
5
GU
JAR
AT
G
AN
DH
INA
GA
R
13
5
4
0.7
2 0
.72
1
.20
0
3
17
39
0
.99
1
57
71
8
13
39
07
07
3
86
34
GU
JAR
AT
JA
MN
AG
AR
1
36
7
0
.36
0.3
7
0.6
4
41
18
9
32
23
3
0.7
6
61
99
35
3
02
85
47
80
9
74
37
GU
JAR
AT
JU
NA
GA
D
13
7
No
ne
0
.45
0.4
2
0.6
2
38
40
4
44
03
0
.79
5
06
58
3
32
00
72
23
2
14
45
10
GU
JAR
AT
K
AC
HC
HH
1
38
N
on
e
0.3
1 0
.32
0
.79
1
85
5
17
56
9
0.7
8
78
89
47
1
57
67
28
34
2
87
41
GU
JAR
AT
K
HE
DA
1
39
6
0
.69
0.6
8
0.6
4
37
7
29
24
3
0.6
7
28
81
72
9
41
30
61
1
27
11
9
GU
JAR
AT
M
AH
ES
AN
A
14
0
4
0.6
0 0
.56
1
.16
3
63
4
26
42
4
0.9
1
32
54
50
2
56
61
72
18
1
95
89
GU
JAR
AT
N
AR
MA
DA
1
41
N
on
e
0.3
4 0
.34
0
.30
1
59
7
37
72
3
0.2
8
11
79
66
1
51
22
19
3
49
00
GU
JAR
AT
N
AV
SA
RI
1
42
6
0
.47
0.4
8
0.4
8
0
52
95
0
0.7
0
13
46
51
2
17
72
04
3
20
60
9
GU
JAR
AT
P
AN
CH
MA
HA
LS
14
3
1
0.1
5 0
.12
0
.41
1
38
4
11
53
8
0.2
6
29
92
29
4
69
74
97
1
42
29
5
GU
JAR
AT
P
AT
AN
1
44
4
0
.46
0.3
6
1.2
2
14
23
1
42
63
1
.00
3
73
83
2
89
13
82
08
6
80
7
GU
JAR
AT
P
OR
BA
ND
AR
1
45
3
0
.45
0.4
2
0.7
2
59
23
3
47
21
0
.89
1
29
07
5
42
94
01
63
2
78
81
GU
JAR
AT
R
AJK
OT
1
46
7
0
.41
0.4
1
0.6
5
94
57
2
38
60
7
0.4
3
71
12
68
4
84
78
39
85
1
52
83
8
GU
JAR
AT
S
AB
AR
KA
NT
HA
1
47
7
0
.53
0.5
5
0
.73
1
48
31
2
36
00
0
.83
4
27
22
3
3
06
99
01
28
9
55
81
GU
JAR
AT
SU
RA
T
14
8
6
0.6
9
0.6
4
0.4
5
0
62
39
5
0.9
8
36
42
80
74
92
13
61
37
32
9
GU
JAR
AT
SU
RE
ND
RA
NA
GA
R
14
9
1
0.1
8
0.1
8
0.6
0
74
5
21
61
8
0.4
7
69
78
22
23
40
53
96
3
53
09
1
GU
JAR
AT
TH
E D
AN
GS
15
0
1
0.0
3
0.0
2
0.1
7
5
11
75
9
0.0
0
44
17
4
22
02
73
3
15
19
GU
JAR
AT
VA
DO
DA
RA
15
1
6
0.6
4
0.6
1
0.5
4
78
63
25
40
5
0.4
4
46
02
43
15
60
74
14
3
29
86
2
GU
JAR
AT
VA
LSA
D
15
2
1
0.2
4
0.2
4
0.4
2
0
31
83
2
0.6
4
14
66
46
11
07
67
35
12
97
4
HA
RY
AN
A
AM
BA
LA
15
3
4 a
nd
10
0.8
0
0.8
1
0.8
6
0
54
16
8
0.0
0
10
22
67
12
39
10
20
0
19
04
1
HA
RY
AN
A
BH
IWA
NI
15
4
4 a
nd
6
0.9
0
0.8
7
1.1
5
72
32
93
6
0.6
2
39
17
65
19
36
29
05
5
27
47
5
HA
RY
AN
A
FA
RID
AB
AD
15
5
4, 6
an
d 1
0
0.8
3
0.7
5
0.8
9
12
53
12
0
0.0
1
16
82
66
24
95
70
21
1
32
48
2
HA
RY
AN
A
FA
TE
HA
BA
D
15
6
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.7
4
0
61
78
7
0.0
0
20
23
16
16
98
33
60
0
22
12
4
HA
RY
AN
A
GU
RG
AO
N
15
7
4
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.2
6
0
39
51
1
0.0
4
21
88
91
37
28
19
55
11
64
6
HA
RY
AN
A
HIS
AR
15
8
4 a
nd
6
0.9
9
0.9
7
0.9
4
0
49
68
8
0.0
1
22
04
05
13
92
90
00
0
23
20
4
HA
RY
AN
A
JHA
JJA
R
15
9
4, 6
an
d 1
1
0.9
9
0.9
9
1.0
0
0
29
14
3
0.0
9
11
12
17
11
76
46
57
6
20
99
5
HA
RY
AN
A
JIN
D
16
0
4
0.9
1
0.8
9
1.1
2
0
49
69
1
0.0
1
14
88
79
19
51
72
80
0
34
59
0
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
45
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SH
AR
YA
NA
KA
ITH
AL
16
1
4 a
nd
10
0.9
6
0.9
5
2.1
4
0
53
40
1
0.0
0
15
93
72
20
69
10
00
0
36
66
0
HA
RY
AN
A
KA
RN
AL
16
2
4 a
nd
10
0.8
4
0.8
2
1.4
8
12
3
67
82
5
0.0
0
19
19
96
17
60
73
22
4
46
80
1
HA
RY
AN
A
KU
RU
KS
HE
TR
A
16
3
4 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.2
0
0
69
19
6
0.0
1
11
68
05
26
29
02
00
0
32
54
0
HA
RY
AN
A
MA
HE
ND
RA
GA
RH
16
4
4
0.8
4
0.8
2
1.0
2
0
30
65
2
0.9
3
50
29
4
13
08
31
66
0
20
41
8
HA
RY
AN
A
PA
NC
HK
ULA
16
5
4
0.5
6
0.4
6
0.8
1
40
3
51
35
0
0.0
3
17
49
2
10
27
99
00
19
34
HA
RY
AN
A
PA
NIP
AT
16
6
4, 6
an
d 1
0
0.8
9
0.8
6
1.6
3
0
64
74
2
0.0
2
12
70
98
75
36
06
00
19
24
3
HA
RY
AN
A
RE
WA
RI
16
7
4 a
nd
11
0.7
2
0.7
4
1.1
3
28
26
50
1
0.5
1
69
68
0
72
14
32
24
19
20
0
HA
RY
AN
A
RO
HTA
K
16
8
6
1.0
0
1.0
0
0.7
0
0
35
23
0
0.0
0
57
03
5
87
68
04
00
13
74
6
HA
RY
AN
A
SIR
SA
16
9
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.7
6
0
54
33
3
0.0
1
94
36
38
21
84
27
20
0
27
75
6
HA
RY
AN
A
SO
NIP
AT
17
0
4, 6
an
d 1
0
0.8
2
0.7
3
1.3
9
0
53
74
0
0.0
8
20
50
21
20
20
69
90
0
37
48
7
HA
RY
AN
A
YA
MU
NA
NA
GA
R
17
1
4, 6
an
d 1
0
0.8
8
0.8
8
1.3
8
0
65
99
8
0.0
1
94
65
8
11
44
16
40
0
20
50
4
HIM
AC
HA
L
BIL
AS
PU
R_H
17
2
9
0.1
4
0.0
6
0.0
0
20
95
53
74
0
0.8
9
33
40
0
44
97
51
79
10
7
HIM
AC
HA
L
C
HA
MB
A
1
73
9
0
.17
0.0
9
0
.00
3
94
1
3
30
30
43
52
4
52
50
0
0
HIM
AC
HA
L
HA
MIR
PU
R_H
1
74
9
0
.08
0.0
3
0.0
0
53
0
36
71
9
0.9
1
37
72
5
78
54
12
1
75
HIM
AC
HA
L
KA
NG
RA
1
75
7
an
d 9
0
.38
0.1
8
0.4
9
30
68
2
43
12
8
0.8
8
11
46
44
1
09
34
94
1
10
95
HIM
AC
HA
L
KIN
NA
UR
1
76
9
0
.77
0.5
0
0.0
0
57
87
9
71
04
99
86
0
0
HIM
AC
HA
L
KU
LLU
1
77
9
0
.04
0.0
1
0.0
0
19
71
1
02
05
2
0.0
0
31
91
2 89
14
7 1
HIM
AC
HA
L
LA
HU
L A
ND
SP
ITI
1
78
9
1
.00
0.5
5
0.0
0
35
79
3
70
9 4
50
0 0
HIM
AC
HA
L
MA
ND
I
17
9
9
0.3
2 0
.10
0
.32
1
16
41
4
44
01
0
.77
9
22
97
2
19
58
8
13
HIM
AC
HA
L
SH
IMLA
1
80
7
an
d 9
0
.09
0.0
3
0.0
0
15
70
4
70
77
2 33
68
2 0
HIM
AC
HA
L
SIR
MA
UR
1
81
9
0
.49
0.1
3
0.3
5
95
42
7
85
52
0
.93
3
91
69
3
26
15
85
6
19
HIM
AC
HA
L
SO
LA
N
18
2
9
0.5
1 0
.12
0
.55
6
99
0
95
32
9
0.8
9
34
64
7
97
51
21
0
98
8
HIM
AC
HA
L
UN
A
18
3
9
0.2
1 0
.14
1
.23
1
23
4
05
68
0
.75
3
64
25
1
33
00
38
8
20
83
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
AN
AN
TN
AG
1
84
7
an
d 9
0
.63
0.5
8
0.1
1
45
27
8
28
63
0
7
06
24
11
67
0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
BA
DG
AM
1
85
7
an
d 9
0
.82
0.7
2
0.2
7
24
04
2
27
61
7
44
40
0 18
70
0 0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
BA
RA
MU
LA
18
6
7 a
nd
9
0.7
4 0
.52
0
.10
3
04
51
2
05
62
81
12
3 42
16
0 0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
DO
DA
1
87
9
0
.33
0.3
1
0.2
0
10
46
6
11
03
4
0.0
0
78
07
8 7
00
2
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
JA
MM
U
1
88
9
0
.63
0.5
8
0
.18
2
44
2
91
91
0
.96
9
36
56
5
15
60
94
1
90
4
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
18
9
9
0.0
0
0
0
0
JA
MM
U &
KA
SH
MIR
KA
RG
IL
19
0
9
1.0
0
0.8
2
0.0
9
95
80
84
73
10
47
9
20
00
0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
KA
TH
UA
19
1
9
0.2
8
0.2
8
0.1
8
37
35
29
92
2
0.9
9
99
51
3
31
73
33
6
11
85
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
KU
PW
AR
A
19
2
7 a
nd
9
0.2
4
0.2
6
0.2
6
20
00
0
12
40
6
44
42
6
0
0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
LE
H
19
3
9
1.0
0
0.6
9
0.0
1
10
05
8
15
36
7
10
01
6
0
0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
PU
LWA
MA
19
4
9
0.8
1
0.6
8
0.2
9
31
74
38
22
0
1.0
0
61
71
5
10
50
0
2
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
PU
NC
H
19
5
7 a
nd
9
0.2
4
0.0
9
0.4
0
33
26
4
21
68
9
27
37
8
0
0
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
RA
JAU
RI
19
6
9
0.1
5
0.0
5
0.3
1
52
36
27
78
2
0.9
2
54
47
5
0
13
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
SR
INA
GA
R
19
7
7 a
nd
9
0.9
5
0.8
4
0.6
6
12
99
7
75
93
6
0.2
0
25
12
7
94
00
0
25
JAM
MU
& K
AS
HM
IR
UD
HA
MP
UR
19
8
9
0.1
9
0.1
2
0.4
8
35
31
19
38
5
0.9
2
78
41
3
32
41
6
26
JHA
RK
HA
ND
BO
KA
RO
19
9
1 a
nd
2
0.2
6
0.0
3
0.3
4
58
94
54
31
0
0.0
0
20
78
2
36
08
17
5
50
30
JHA
RK
HA
ND
CH
AT
RA
20
0
1 a
nd
2
0.0
2
0.0
4
0.3
6
10
67
4
37
01
4
0.0
0
25
28
9
86
98
06
7
13
19
5
JHA
RK
HA
ND
DE
OG
HA
R
20
1
1 a
nd
2
0.1
4
0.0
4
0.3
5
11
75
4
27
22
9
0.0
0
31
48
8
14
13
97
33
58
35
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
46
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SJH
AR
KH
AN
D
DH
AN
BA
D
20
2
1 a
nd
2
0.1
9
0.0
2
0.5
6
56
10
48
46
8
0.0
3
62
68
26
07
81
3
33
57
JHA
RK
HA
ND
DU
MK
A
20
3
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
6
0.0
4
0.2
8
36
09
7
28
78
3
0.0
0
10
06
59
33
31
87
66
32
25
2
JHA
RK
HA
ND
GA
RH
WA
20
4
1
0.1
5
0.0
8
0.3
6
54
74
27
44
8
0.0
0
47
38
1
23
75
94
6
27
10
JHA
RK
HA
ND
GIR
IDIH
20
5
1 a
nd
2
0.2
7
0.0
5
0.3
7
59
05
40
07
6
0.0
0
49
21
3
87
40
49
9
62
63
JHA
RK
HA
ND
GO
DD
A
20
6
1 a
nd
7
0.1
4
0.0
7
0.4
5
10
10
99
31
07
0
0.0
0
42
03
1
58
53
67
6
46
59
JHA
RK
HA
ND
GU
ML
A
20
7
1 a
nd
7
0.1
3
0.0
3
0.2
8
14
61
2
14
75
2
0.0
0
19
99
27
94
91
59
9
14
40
7
JHA
RK
HA
ND
HA
ZA
RIB
AG
20
8
1 a
nd
2
0.1
9
0.0
4
0.4
1
23
27
0.0
0
28
33
8
13
00
15
3
62
87
JHA
RK
HA
ND
KO
DA
RM
A
20
9
2
0.3
7
0.1
0
0.3
6
25
44
62
95
4
0.0
3
75
54
35
90
44
8
33
94
JHA
RK
HA
ND
LOH
AR
DA
GA
21
0
2
0.3
8
0.1
0
0.4
1
10
20
32
20
1
0.0
1
27
40
2
27
51
35
1
43
56
JHA
RK
HA
ND
PA
KA
UR
21
1
1
0.1
5
0.0
2
0.1
5
29
70
27
77
6
0.1
4
34
51
1
15
54
29
0
18
48
JHA
RK
HA
ND
PA
LA
MU
21
2
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
3
0.0
6
0.3
2
37
06
0
26
21
1
0.0
1
93
18
6
75
28
57
4
12
18
2
JHA
RK
HA
ND
PA
SC
HIM
I S
ING
BH
UM
21
3
1 a
nd
7
0.0
3
0.0
0
0.1
4
21
99
2
21
63
3
0.0
0
15
42
52
26
69
49
1
26
73
JHA
RK
HA
ND
P
UR
BI
SIN
GH
BH
UM
2
14
1
0
.03
0.0
1
0
.23
3
81
8
3
34
23
0
.17
3
04
42
6
33
71
18
1
63
6
JHA
RK
HA
ND
R
AN
CH
I
21
5
1 a
nd
2
0.2
3 0
.04
0
.42
3
80
2
29
81
7
0.0
2
15
07
33
1
52
75
24
0
20
52
4
JHA
RK
HA
ND
S
AH
IBG
AN
J
21
6
1
0.0
6 0
.03
0
.23
2
47
1
30
10
3
0.0
0
29
69
9
20
62
92
4
19
39
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
AG
ALK
OT
2
17
5
0
.51
0.4
6
0.9
1
36
26
1
46
28
0
.99
4
50
14
4
24
00
89
36
0
38
18
9
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
AN
GLO
RE
2
18
1
2
0.1
5 0
.17
1
.41
1
36
0
52
83
9
0.9
4
60
53
2
94
31
10
13
1
39
80
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
AN
GLO
RE
RU
RA
L
21
9
5
0.1
6 0
.19
1
.17
4
21
1
0
.92
3
19
14
4
33
47
76
74
7
46
70
1
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
ELG
AU
N
22
0
No
ne
0
.56
0.4
9
0.7
8
20
54
1
98
01
0
.95
9
01
14
5
42
74
24
59
4
10
03
18
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
ELLA
RY
2
21
6
0
.38
0.3
4
0.4
2
51
39
1
85
10
0
.97
4
85
38
1
85
11
30
64
2
33
69
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
IDA
R
22
2
1
0.1
2 0
.09
0
.57
6
02
5
13
49
4
0.9
8
40
11
12
6
90
81
14
6
26
99
0
KA
RN
ATA
KA
B
IJA
PU
R
22
3
No
ne
0
.34
0.2
6
0.7
5
45
10
8
66
4
0.9
8
85
61
61
1
10
64
33
5
43
14
KA
RN
ATA
KA
C
HA
MA
RA
JAN
AG
AR
2
24
5
0
.24
0.2
3
0.8
0
12
33
2
30
67
0
.94
1
94
09
6
68
94
44
27
2
60
07
KA
RN
ATA
KA
C
HIK
MA
GA
LUR
2
25
1
0
.24
0.2
0
0.4
3
11
60
7
27
84
6
0.9
5
30
26
03
5
64
41
37
6
24
63
8
KA
RN
ATA
KA
C
HIT
RA
DU
RG
A
22
6
5
0.1
9 0
.15
1
.02
5
54
0
18
20
5
0.9
8
18
72
48
1
98
47
47
70
5
00
99
KA
RN
ATA
KA
D
AK
SH
INA
KA
NN
AD
A
22
7
10
0
.77
0.5
4
0.6
9
66
3
69
70
7
0.7
3
14
50
43
1
21
08
04
65
4
12
78
KA
RN
ATA
KA
D
AV
AN
AG
ER
E
22
8
5
0.4
2 0
.37
0
.89
3
54
1
26
57
4
0.9
9
89
28
85
2
31
86
47
04
4
32
26
KA
RN
ATA
KA
D
HA
RW
AD
2
29
1
0
.16
0.1
5
0
.59
1
61
4
1
04
92
0
.98
3
21
35
6
1
74
65
09
0
9
43
3
KA
RN
ATA
KA
GA
DA
G
23
0
5
0.1
6
0.1
4
0.8
9
14
95
84
66
0.9
9
37
85
65
26
31
67
17
99
15
KA
RN
ATA
KA
GU
LB
AR
GA
23
1
1
0.1
9
0.1
5
0.3
0
31
55
11
18
3
0.7
4
13
00
57
2
10
85
92
55
7
33
65
3
KA
RN
ATA
KA
HA
SS
AN
23
2
1 a
nd
7
0.2
9
0.2
7
0.5
5
27
96
3
23
47
1
0.9
8
43
64
12
13
55
50
27
3
47
34
4
KA
RN
ATA
KA
HA
VE
RI
23
3
1 a
nd
7
0.2
1
0.1
6
0.6
4
12
41
2
17
87
8
0.9
6
36
09
45
57
34
67
68
24
58
4
KA
RN
ATA
KA
KO
DA
GU
23
4
9
0.0
2
0.0
1
0.2
1
26
42
73
23
9
0.9
9
16
07
87
90
47
71
8
13
83
KA
RN
ATA
KA
KO
LA
R
23
5
5 a
nd
7
0.2
1
0.1
7
1.6
7
15
28
3
53
12
2
0.9
5
20
35
36
55
43
06
77
5
61
52
6
KA
RN
ATA
KA
KO
PP
AL
23
6
6
0.3
7
0.3
0
0.4
3
38
78
15
24
6
0.8
5
40
97
62
55
32
56
03
28
40
7
KA
RN
ATA
KA
MA
ND
YA
23
7
3 a
nd
6
0.4
2
0.3
9
0.4
7
60
72
44
44
6
0.9
7
28
12
59
13
67
59
53
5
38
82
8
KA
RN
ATA
KA
MY
SO
RE
23
8
6
0.4
8
0.4
3
0.4
3
60
94
35
95
7
0.9
7
35
75
02
79
98
34
13
26
90
1
KA
RN
ATA
KA
RA
ICH
UR
23
9
No
ne
0.3
4
0.2
6
0.3
1
28
14
11
07
3
0.9
8
63
83
58
22
62
43
46
11
67
3
KA
RN
ATA
KA
SH
IMO
GA
24
0
6 a
nd
7
0.7
0
0.5
7
0.2
7
59
68
7
44
49
2
0.9
2
24
50
69
68
41
66
37
26
40
8
KA
RN
ATA
KA
TU
MK
UR
24
1
5 a
nd
7
0.2
8
0.2
1
1.0
0
12
14
4
19
50
0
0.9
0
55
97
38
78
72
03
55
8
11
17
18
KA
RN
ATA
KA
UD
UP
I
24
2
No
ne
0.6
1
0.3
4
0.3
7
47
30
47
71
8
0.9
3
10
31
16
50
48
56
17
29
80
4
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
47
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SK
AR
NA
TA
KA
UT
TA
RA
KA
NN
AD
A
24
3
7
0.5
6
0.2
4
0.3
7
12
46
2
32
73
2
0.9
5
12
85
46
25
07
78
23
27
01
6
KE
RL
AA
LA
PP
UZ
HA
24
4
7 a
nd
10
0.7
3
0.3
6
0.2
9
78
2
50
14
7
0.7
9
50
23
2
18
60
04
3
62
16
KE
RL
AE
RN
AK
ULA
M
24
5
3 a
nd
7
0.4
6
0.1
7
0.4
2
25
01
52
47
8
0.9
8
97
52
3
20
40
52
76
18
95
1
KE
RL
AID
UK
KI
24
6
7 a
nd
9
0.6
3
0.2
5
0.4
3
40
30
71
54
6
0.8
2
15
25
19
77
70
88
3
57
80
KE
RL
AK
AN
NU
R
24
7
7
0.5
3
0.1
2
0.4
6
11
71
5
46
33
6
0.9
4
11
05
22
10
48
01
83
19
23
2
KE
RL
AK
AS
AR
AG
OD
24
8
7 a
nd
10
0.7
9
0.3
6
0.7
1
12
81
1
53
47
6
0.8
7
72
16
4
16
18
92
12
84
77
KE
RL
AK
OLLA
M
24
9
7
0.3
5
0.0
3
0.3
8
43
32
79
18
2
0.7
4
76
75
8
23
61
26
0
76
36
KE
RL
AK
OT
TA
YA
M
25
0
7
0.3
4
0.1
1
0.2
9
10
35
58
14
3
0.8
3
10
74
57
29
11
52
9
61
16
KE
RL
AK
OZ
HIK
OD
E
25
1
7
0.3
6
0.0
8
0.5
6
22
83
60
37
6
0.9
4
95
93
8
42
78
51
5
90
03
KE
RL
AM
ALA
PP
UR
AM
25
2
7
0.6
5
0.2
6
0.5
7
11
30
1
66
02
2
0.9
7
10
94
78
15
96
58
15
13
89
6
KE
RL
AP
ALA
KK
AD
25
3
7
0.5
6
0.4
2
0.6
2
11
30
8
60
17
5
0.9
2
11
99
09
26
87
48
37
11
38
0
KE
RL
AP
AT
HA
NA
MT
HIT
TA
25
4
7
0.5
8
0.0
7
0.3
7
32
23
77
80
9
0.6
4
55
66
6
32
45
63
8
75
83
KE
RL
AT
HIR
UV
AN
AN
TH
AP
UR
AM
2
55
7
0
.62
0.1
1
0
.53
1
45
63
7
08
45
0
.82
7
22
13
8
37
34
10
6
58
9
KE
RL
AT
RIS
SU
R
25
6
7
0.6
6 0
.43
0
.53
1
28
39
5
91
29
0
.99
7
95
76
4
11
19
91
3
48
05
7
KE
RL
AW
AY
AN
AD
2
57
7
an
d 9
0
.50
0.2
8
0.1
8
42
98
8
26
04
0
.75
8
28
00
3
24
07
23
8
73
LA
KS
HA
DW
EE
P
LA
KS
HA
DW
EE
P
25
8
12
0
.00
0.0
0
0.6
7
0
24
09
0
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
BA
LA
GH
AT
2
59
6
an
d 7
0
.42
0.3
7
0.1
4
31
67
2
14
81
7
0.8
7
28
20
40
1
72
63
95
2
10
46
4
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
BA
RW
AN
I
26
0
3
0.4
1 0
.30
0
.72
2
93
1
12
00
1
1.0
0
23
08
17
5
91
83
44
8
27
36
8
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
BE
TU
L
26
1
3
0.4
2 0
.30
0
.52
7
41
0
13
89
8
0.8
8
44
43
63
8
31
97
26
8
63
01
3
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
BH
IND
2
62
N
on
e
0.4
2 0
.33
0
.41
4
0
16
02
1
0.5
5
32
52
53
1
62
24
88
85
1
52
54
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
BH
OP
AL
2
63
1
1
0.7
0 0
.73
0
.75
1
83
1
21
21
9
0.9
9
14
44
03
3
97
74
55
7
20
52
7
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
CH
HA
TA
RP
UR
2
64
7
0
.68
0.5
7
0.6
7
18
92
8
15
05
8
0.6
6
44
43
21
2
77
48
90
9
12
22
5
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
CH
HIN
DW
AR
A
26
5
3
0.4
6 0
.30
0
.53
8
22
2
12
10
0
.92
4
88
21
6
72
72
91
99
8
47
33
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
DA
MO
H
26
6
No
ne
0
.69
0.4
8
0.6
2
64
31
1
37
07
0
.86
2
80
70
0
38
00
52
62
2
20
52
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
DA
TIA
2
67
6
an
d 1
1
0.9
8 0
.94
0
.48
1
2
17
26
3
0.7
3
21
22
59
3
44
86
26
7
24
03
1
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
DE
WA
S
26
8
4
0.5
1 0
.47
0
.82
3
20
3
25
76
3
0.9
2
41
30
33
1
08
46
19
14
5
54
38
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
DH
AR
2
69
4
an
d 7
0
.55
0.4
9
0.8
2
32
94
4
20
15
1
0.9
5
48
87
10
1
19
46
28
46
8
09
97
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
D
IND
OR
I
2
70
1
0
.01
0.0
1
0
.08
4
62
7
70
1
0
.31
2
24
13
2
3
39
56
0
3
32
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
KH
AN
DW
A
27
1
3
0.3
8
0.2
8
0.6
6
21
5
27
33
0
0.9
9
41
08
41
63
75
89
87
66
24
9
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
GU
NA
27
2
No
ne
0.6
7
0.6
5
0.5
3
48
32
12
52
0
0.5
4
58
88
07
51
22
21
34
50
26
6
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
GW
ALIO
R
27
3
6
0.6
2
0.6
1
0.4
3
12
81
0.8
8
20
24
39
52
83
53
71
21
61
3
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
HA
RD
A
27
4
6 a
nd
11
0.8
5
0.8
0
0.2
9
12
26
24
28
8
0.8
6
17
26
21
34
88
73
84
15
66
9
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
HO
SH
AN
GA
BA
D
27
5
6 a
nd
11
0.8
6
0.8
6
0.1
9
10
76
0
25
26
9
0.9
8
30
84
34
57
65
16
19
31
42
0
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
IND
OR
E
27
6
4
0.7
5
0.7
9
1.2
0
3
33
07
7
1.0
0
24
19
18
17
67
84
31
8
40
95
5
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
JAB
ALP
UR
27
7
No
ne
0.5
5
0.5
1
0.4
9
68
2
20
54
1
0.9
9
28
36
15
51
41
86
00
23
12
8
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
JHA
BU
A
27
8
7
0.4
6
0.2
2
0.3
8
17
14
7
97
69
0.7
7
35
75
47
40
00
80
05
23
08
2
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
KA
TN
I
27
9
7
0.3
7
0.3
3
0.4
1
53
03
9
12
39
3
0.8
7
21
66
33
20
56
60
44
13
21
7
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
MA
ND
LA
28
0
1
0.2
1
0.1
5
0.1
5
32
36
88
01
0.8
8
25
93
41
14
98
53
1
23
69
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
MA
ND
SA
UR
28
1
4
0.6
1
0.4
0
0.9
6
76
64
21
41
2
0.9
8
34
50
44
91
65
65
73
99
26
6
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
MO
RE
NA
28
2
6 a
nd
11
0.8
1
0.7
7
0.4
1
14
44
22
75
5
0.7
3
26
83
55
10
30
12
10
0
23
00
7
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
NA
RS
IMH
AP
UR
28
3
No
ne
0.6
3
0.5
5
0.7
6
18
35
24
63
4
0.9
7
29
84
79
16
95
19
17
1
46
74
3
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
48
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SM
AD
HY
A P
RA
DE
SH
NE
EM
UC
H
28
4
4
0.6
9
0.5
3
0.8
3
48
56
27
19
0
1.0
0
17
47
82
76
74
85
57
51
02
3
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
PA
NN
A
28
5
1 a
nd
7
0.2
5
0.2
2
0.2
6
14
74
6
85
56
0.4
6
28
81
76
14
72
01
98
12
27
9
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
RA
ISE
N
28
6
No
ne
0.5
1
0.4
5
0.4
5
86
40
14
23
0
0.8
5
41
81
48
38
34
44
59
20
90
2
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
RA
JGA
RH
28
7
4
0.6
5
0.5
2
0.8
3
24
54
18
64
4
0.9
6
44
34
82
10
65
29
31
9
76
79
4
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
RA
TLA
M
28
8
4
0.4
3
0.3
5
1.2
6
23
48
25
03
0
0.9
6
31
97
46
67
70
86
91
59
40
4
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
RE
WA
28
9
7
0.3
7
0.3
2
0.5
4
81
61
5
11
71
8
0.9
0
35
56
58
40
95
43
95
25
16
6
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SA
GA
R
29
0
No
ne
0.5
2
0.4
6
0.5
9
13
15
39
9
0.7
7
51
40
24
87
27
71
15
65
45
3
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SA
TN
A
29
1
7
0.3
7
0.3
2
0.7
4
12
96
5
12
70
1
0.9
0
34
89
03
60
42
92
37
32
02
2
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SE
HO
RE
29
2
No
ne
0.5
8
0.5
1
0.7
7
11
43
0
23
05
1
0.9
7
39
51
84
16
25
89
37
3
48
47
7
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SE
ON
I
29
3
7
0.4
5
0.3
6
0.2
9
27
50
32
13
06
2
0.7
1
41
79
64
20
36
20
52
18
81
0
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SH
AH
DO
L
29
4
1
0.1
0
0.0
5
0.0
6
99
79
72
69
0.6
9
37
24
89
26
90
03
0
53
89
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SH
AJA
PU
R
29
5
4 a
nd
7
0.3
6
0.3
8
0.9
8
16
78
7
20
23
9
0.9
9
46
47
00
12
14
05
90
9
59
80
9
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
S
HE
OP
UR
2
96
6
an
d 1
1
0
.81
0.7
7
0
.37
5
13
7
2
31
65
0
.90
1
68
08
1
4
21
57
14
0
9
32
5
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SH
IVP
UR
I
29
7
7
0.5
4 0
.49
0
.68
1
33
90
1
83
97
0
.02
4
47
92
7
12
27
60
76
3
51
59
5
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
SID
HI
2
98
7
0
.42
0.2
6
0.3
4
25
05
0
93
36
0
.88
3
75
14
3
26
86
94
29
2
16
56
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
TIK
AM
GA
RH
2
99
N
on
e
0.6
1 0
.55
0
.72
3
85
2
20
89
1
0.4
9
20
58
77
6
04
79
81
5
44
82
2
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
UJJ
AIN
3
00
4
an
d 7
0
.68
0.5
7
0.9
5
13
29
0
22
65
4
0.9
8
49
94
12
1
42
08
70
32
8
31
04
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
UM
AR
IYA
3
01
1
0
.22
0.1
3
0.1
1
63
80
7
08
4
0.7
7
12
05
22
7
17
63
18
3
50
1
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
VID
ISH
A
30
2
No
ne
0
.55
0.5
8
0.5
4
73
27
1
54
78
0
.32
5
22
75
0
70
30
56
52
3
59
96
MA
DH
YA
PR
AD
ES
H
WE
ST
NIM
AR
3
03
3
0
.41
0.3
0
0.7
5
25
8
14
75
1
0.9
9
40
09
66
2
71
17
91
6
74
04
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
AH
MA
DN
AG
AR
3
04
5
0
.32
0.2
9
0.8
2
70
79
9
92
1
0.8
5 1
15
10
49
2
42
77
54
08
1
96
92
8
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
AK
OL
A
30
5
1
0.1
1 0
.10
0
.45
1
20
8
12
66
0
.96
4
09
62
8
18
82
40
71
2
18
80
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
AM
RA
VA
TI
3
06
1
, 3 a
nd
7
0.1
7 0
.16
0
.68
4
12
35
2
09
03
0
.97
6
93
40
6
11
45
30
67
9
82
65
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
AU
RA
NG
AB
AD
_M
30
7
1, 3
an
d 7
0
.12
0.1
0
0.7
2
12
73
67
1
10
76
0
.99
6
50
00
8
25
07
86
57
1
03
52
1
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
BH
AN
DA
RA
3
08
7
0
.39
0.4
0
0.3
3
92
56
7
25
89
3
0.9
0
19
65
40
2
18
85
22
3
18
07
4
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
BID
3
09
1
0
.07
0.0
7
0.5
1
93
40
9
79
6
0.9
8
73
86
53
8
61
92
70
4
49
62
7
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
BU
LD
AN
A
31
0
1 a
nd
7
0.1
3 0
.13
0
.70
3
57
70
1
23
64
0
.84
6
55
05
2
75
19
31
81
7
34
14
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
C
HA
ND
RA
PU
R
3
11
1
an
d 7
0
.26
0.1
6
0
.16
4
05
57
1
69
86
0
.63
5
23
16
9
3
03
51
06
9
2
25
77
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
DH
ULE
31
2
1, 3
an
d 7
0.1
8
0.1
6
0.5
2
54
27
5
11
92
1
0.9
2
39
61
54
12
21
80
84
8
67
10
6
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
GA
DC
HIR
OL
I
31
3
7
0.4
2
0.3
1
0.2
5
22
77
4
13
64
4
0.5
0
19
94
91
22
73
46
45
13
21
7
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
GO
ND
IYA
31
4
6 a
nd
7
0.3
8
0.3
7
0.2
0
66
82
0
0.6
4
19
66
50
10
02
30
22
97
88
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
HIN
GO
LI
31
5
1
0.0
2
0.0
1
0.3
7
51
21
0.9
9
34
49
67
32
72
05
33
32
38
9
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
JALG
AO
N
31
6
5 a
nd
7
0.1
9
0.1
9
0.8
1
22
52
2
47
86
8
0.9
7
76
49
37
26
33
04
07
3
13
54
48
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
JALN
A
31
7
1 a
nd
3
0.0
7
0.0
7
0.5
3
44
54
12
66
1
0.9
6
57
07
56
81
76
54
70
72
46
4
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
KO
LH
AP
UR
31
8
6
0.5
0
0.3
5
0.4
1
77
4
34
44
6
0.8
4
39
79
00
12
43
36
44
9
47
08
8
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
LA
TU
R
31
9
1
0.0
7
0.0
4
0.7
5
37
45
13
13
9
0.9
9
58
40
54
67
67
40
08
53
78
4
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
MU
MB
AI
32
0
12
0.0
0
0
0
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
MU
MB
AI(
SU
BU
RB
AN
)
32
1
12
0.0
0
0
0
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
NA
GP
UR
32
2
1, 3
an
d 7
0.2
5
0.2
0
0.5
2
86
89
2
24
59
0
0.9
4
48
29
90
77
30
12
78
69
82
2
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
NA
ND
ED
32
3
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.3
5
93
7
23
11
1
0.9
9
76
75
33
51
19
56
82
41
09
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
NA
ND
UR
BA
R
32
4
1 a
nd
7
0.1
9
0.1
8
0.5
0
48
23
9
12
35
7
0.9
5
27
79
13
63
36
11
79
29
63
5
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
49
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SM
AH
AR
AS
HT
RA
NA
SH
IK
32
5
3 a
nd
7
0.3
7
0.2
7
0.5
8
12
87
6
33
75
0
0.9
7
81
96
65
29
67
76
61
0
18
97
21
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
OS
MA
NA
BA
D
32
6
1 a
nd
3
0.1
8
0.1
1
0.7
2
70
17
93
91
0.9
8
47
04
84
84
74
77
78
63
81
6
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
PA
RB
HA
NI
32
7
1
0.0
2
0.0
2
0.4
5
10
73
2
15
12
5
0.9
9
51
00
36
48
25
99
64
34
41
3
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
PU
NE
32
8
1, 3
an
d 7
0.2
5
0.2
4
0.7
3
23
38
5
28
93
5
0.9
7
92
67
81
19
47
60
97
09
13
77
33
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
RA
IGA
RH
_M
32
9
1
0.2
0
0.1
8
0.1
3
15
22
28
95
2
0.7
2
29
18
64
38
73
58
7
50
33
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
RA
TN
AG
IRI
33
0
1
0.2
8
0.2
4
0.1
1
28
32
46
34
5
0.7
1
34
98
06
36
12
97
2
34
78
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
SA
NG
LI
33
1
5 a
nd
7
0.3
7
0.2
5
0.8
3
41
91
7
23
09
1
0.9
7
60
90
00
18
94
39
28
3
11
09
28
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
SA
TA
RA
33
2
3
0.3
6
0.2
7
0.7
3
53
25
21
32
7
0.9
2
59
34
33
82
79
88
82
72
65
0
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
SIN
DH
UD
UR
G
33
3
1
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.3
7
20
41
36
37
8
0.8
3
15
21
91
73
59
50
0
75
28
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
SO
LA
PU
R
33
4
3
0.3
9
0.2
7
0.7
7
26
5
14
67
7
0.9
7
10
33
72
9
42
16
54
60
4
16
16
28
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
TH
AN
E
33
5
1
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.1
3
12
46
30
16
3
0.7
2
23
09
16
98
62
74
1
10
41
2
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
WA
RD
HA
33
6
1 a
nd
3
0.1
0
0.0
5
0.4
6
16
99
23
77
9
0.9
6
40
76
73
76
97
08
59
47
36
4
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
W
AS
HIM
3
37
1
an
d 7
0
.03
0.0
2
0
.38
1
65
20
1
19
50
0
.98
3
44
67
5
2
65
38
59
6
2
70
69
MA
HA
RA
SH
TR
A
YA
VA
TM
AL
3
38
1
0
.18
0.1
7
0.1
9
25
11
1
36
01
0
.94
7
87
66
6
45
81
16
74
4
17
50
MA
NIP
UR
B
ISH
NU
PU
R
33
9
9
0.6
6 0
.42
0
.01
1
12
8
19
23
9 21
00
0 0
MA
NIP
UR
C
HA
ND
EL
3
40
9
0
.00
0.0
0
0.0
0
77
8
96
70
0
0
MA
NIP
UR
C
HU
RA
CH
AN
DP
UR
3
41
9
0
.00
0.0
0
0.0
3
77
4
13
70
6
0
0
MA
NIP
UR
IM
PH
ALE
AS
T
34
2
9
0.0
8 0
.07
0
.00
1
83
4
20
41
4 27
00
0 0
MA
NIP
UR
IM
PH
ALW
ES
T
34
3
9
0.0
7 0
.05
0
.02
7
09
2
21
13
6 40
50
0 0
MA
NIP
UR
S
EN
AP
AT
I
34
4
9
0.0
0 0
.00
0
.00
2
51
7
22
21
0
0
0
MA
NIP
UR
T
AM
EN
GLO
NG
3
45
9
0
.00
0.0
0
0.0
0
75
3
16
02
0
0
0
MA
NIP
UR
T
HO
UB
AL
3
46
9
0
.93
0.6
3
0.0
1
57
09
3
40
22
19
50
0 0
MA
NIP
UR
U
KH
RU
L
34
7
9
0.0
0 0
.00
0
.00
1
54
5
15
22
5
0
0
ME
GH
ALA
YA
E
AS
TG
AR
OH
ILL
S
34
8
9
0.2
9 0
.18
0
.00
5
05
0
23
01
3
2
94
55
0
0
ME
GH
ALA
YA
E
AS
TK
HA
SIH
ILLS
3
49
9
0
.26
0.1
0
0.0
0
79
58
4
56
69
32
11
4
0
0
ME
GH
ALA
YA
JA
INT
IAH
ILL
S
35
0
9
0.2
7 0
.19
0
.00
1
46
44
2
33
81
0
.00
3
33
07
79
00
8
ME
GH
ALA
YA
R
IBH
OI
3
51
7
an
d 9
0
.44
0.1
5
0.0
0
18
74
9
34
48
5
18
81
3
0
0
ME
GH
ALA
YA
S
OU
TH
GA
RO
HIL
LS
3
52
7
an
d 9
0
.14
0.0
8
0
.00
1
50
6
1
73
75
19
22
2
0
0
ME
GH
ALA
YA
WE
ST
GA
RO
HIL
LS
35
3
7 a
nd
9
0.6
4
0.3
8
0.0
0
28
72
9
22
94
2
0.0
1
88
17
6
26
73
76
20
9
ME
GH
ALA
YA
WE
ST
KH
AS
IHIL
LS
35
4
7 a
nd
9
0.2
4
0.0
8
0.0
0
14
52
2
0.0
0
36
99
9
64
00
5
MIZ
OR
AM
AIZ
AW
L
35
5
9
0.0
9
0.0
9
0.0
7
21
67
18
80
2
15
23
4
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
CH
AM
PH
AI
35
6
9
0.0
9
0.1
0
0.0
3
37
43
23
44
3
22
27
4
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
KO
LA
SIB
35
7
9
0.1
2
0.0
7
0.0
2
18
34
21
19
0
11
58
4
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
LA
WN
GT
LA
I
35
8
9
0.0
4
0.0
4
0.0
2
76
0
96
71
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
LUN
GLE
I
35
9
9
0.0
2
0.0
2
0.1
2
10
44
18
65
8
15
77
2
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
MA
MIT
36
0
9
0.2
6
0.2
1
0.0
2
11
66
20
31
5
17
40
0
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
SA
IHA
36
1
9
0.0
1
0.0
1
0.0
1
37
8
17
00
4
39
10
0
0
MIZ
OR
AM
SE
RC
HH
IP
36
2
9
0.1
9
0.1
9
0.0
5
21
32
89
45
0
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
DIM
AP
UR
36
3
7
and
9
0.7
9
0.3
5
0.0
4
21
73
1
21
37
7
0.0
3
58
34
6
35
88
23
10
3
NA
GA
LA
ND
KO
HIM
A
36
4
7 a
nd
9
0.5
6
0.0
9
0.1
3
15
82
4
18
83
6
58
19
4
0
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
MO
KO
KC
HU
NG
36
5
9
0.1
1
0.0
1
0.0
5
50
37
14
33
3
30
93
0
0
0
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
50
S
tate
Dis
tric
tS
_No
Clu
ste
rsIr
r_H
Irr_
AG
W_D
ev
tT
_CC
AP
rod
_Ha
Ele
c_W
NS
Ak
Wh
-eq
uiv
.G
WS
NA
GA
LA
ND
MO
N3
66
90
.07
0.0
10
.14
27
00
16
09
6
44
78
60
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
PH
EK
36
7
7 a
nd
9
0.8
5
0.2
5
0.0
8
13
11
5
17
19
1
31
38
3
0
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
TU
EN
SA
NG
36
8
7 a
nd
9
0.1
8
0.0
1
0.0
6
11
77
4
14
35
4
66
66
6
0
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
WO
KH
A
36
9
9
0.0
6
0.0
1
0.0
5
34
91
17
71
5
18
23
2
0
0
NA
GA
LA
ND
ZU
NH
EB
OT
O
37
0
9
0.0
7
0.0
1
0.0
9
85
90
18
77
1
21
71
7
65
00
0
OR
ISS
AA
NU
GU
L
37
1
2 a
nd
7
0.3
8
0.1
0
0.3
4
25
10
9
41
92
9
0.0
9
13
30
07
13
58
39
58
32
07
4
OR
ISS
AB
ALA
NG
IR
37
2
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
7
0.0
9
0.2
3
41
34
4
21
42
8
0.0
3
26
68
20
23
67
15
87
59
41
5
OR
ISS
AB
ALE
SH
WA
R
37
3
No
ne
0.4
9
0.2
9
0.5
3
57
77
28
71
1
0.4
1
21
92
46
0
21
68
3
OR
ISS
AB
AR
GA
RH
37
4
6 a
nd
7
0.4
3
0.4
0
0.2
6
45
75
3
20
96
0
0.1
4
25
42
99
21
19
07
06
26
49
9
OR
ISS
AB
AU
DH
37
5
2, 6
an
d 7
0.4
5
0.3
3
0.2
0
12
63
9
41
68
1
0.0
1
72
09
6
50
41
61
2
12
87
7
OR
ISS
AB
HA
DR
AK
37
6
6
0.5
1
0.4
0
0.5
9
35
19
33
81
5
0.2
7
16
90
06
13
95
25
76
61
13
OR
ISS
AC
UT
TA
CK
37
7
6 a
nd
7
0.7
2
0.5
0
0.3
8
18
31
4
41
34
4
0.0
8
14
22
87
16
77
94
90
22
34
9
OR
ISS
AD
EB
AG
AR
H
3
78
2
0
.39
0.1
5
0
.16
8
45
2
2
64
74
0
.08
4
19
47
2
77
26
76
7
70
3
OR
ISS
AD
HE
NK
AN
AL
3
79
1
, 2 a
nd
7
0.2
6 0
.12
0
.26
2
58
63
4
28
38
0
.16
7
78
11
5
56
55
95
1
25
08
OR
ISS
AG
AJA
PA
TI
3
80
7
0
.42
0.2
9
0.2
7
25
64
8
35
11
5
0.0
2
54
52
1
17
27
25
2
45
58
OR
ISS
AG
AN
JAM
3
81
6
an
d 7
0
.76
0.6
7
0.3
0
16
42
50
3
51
28
0
.06
2
72
62
2
18
65
64
13
3
47
38
OR
ISS
AJA
GA
TS
ING
HA
PU
R
38
2
6
0.6
6 0
.61
0
.52
1
91
2
51
72
2
0.2
0
93
75
1
75
11
35
4
73
86
OR
ISS
AJA
JAP
UR
3
83
6
0
.34
0.2
0
0.4
9
93
42
3
24
04
0
.17
1
46
23
0
10
92
73
89
9
10
9
OR
ISS
AJH
AR
SU
GU
DA
3
84
1
0
.21
0.1
1
0.3
1
67
39
2
57
63
0
.17
6
09
96
3
25
87
34
6
95
6
OR
ISS
AK
ALA
HA
ND
I
38
5
6 a
nd
7
0.3
5 0
.26
0
.20
2
80
06
2
34
93
0
.02
2
40
49
3
72
31
43
1
21
59
4
OR
ISS
AK
AN
DH
AM
AL
3
86
1
, 2 a
nd
7
0.2
3 0
.06
0
.13
1
82
83
5
35
37
0
.01
8
10
65
3
47
37
16
9
39
0
OR
ISS
AK
EN
DR
AP
AR
A
38
7
6
0.5
4 0
.44
0
.57
5
3
39
03
1
0.2
3
12
47
50
5
09
50
80
2
15
7
OR
ISS
AK
EN
DU
JHA
R
38
8
1 a
nd
7
0.2
8 0
.10
0
.29
2
40
93
4
29
45
0
.04
2
39
00
9
10
50
08
41
2
53
46
OR
ISS
AK
HO
RD
HA
3
89
1
, 2, 6
an
d 7
0
.29
0.2
7
0.3
3
18
95
6
44
20
6
0.0
1
10
53
82
5
36
53
35
1
61
38
OR
ISS
AK
OR
AP
UT
3
90
7
0
.55
0.2
4
0.1
0
31
16
7
25
82
0
0.0
1
23
34
65
3
00
55
15
5
45
2
OR
ISS
AM
ALK
AN
GIR
I
39
1
1
0.1
1 0
.09
0
.09
1
13
9
33
12
1
0.0
2
11
87
85
9
93
75
0
22
28
OR
ISS
AM
AY
UR
BH
AN
J
39
2
1 a
nd
7
0.2
7 0
.18
0
.30
4
09
40
2
37
74
0
.11
3
42
05
8
86
59
58
6
16
76
5
OR
ISS
AN
AB
AR
AN
GA
PU
R
3
93
1
0
.09
0.1
0
0
.15
3
43
0
2
23
96
0
.01
1
87
04
8
8
65
95
86
1
17
17
OR
ISS
AN
AY
AG
AR
H
39
4
1, 2
an
d 7
0.2
0
0.1
3
0.2
4
13
39
9
31
99
4
0.0
2
92
09
1
76
23
93
2
16
80
0
OR
ISS
AN
UA
PA
DA
39
5
1, 2
an
d 7
0.1
5
0.1
0
0.2
1
13
73
1
21
89
2
0.0
3
11
76
59
58
33
01
5
14
59
8
OR
ISS
AP
UR
I
39
6
6 a
nd
10
0.7
7
0.6
3
0.2
1
53
51
52
27
0
0.1
7
13
22
16
13
70
31
47
77
14
OR
ISS
AR
AY
AG
AD
A
39
7
7
0.5
2
0.2
8
0.1
5
63
05
0
31
70
9
0.0
8
14
74
41
21
81
92
3
29
13
OR
ISS
AS
AM
BA
LP
UR
39
8
2 a
nd
7
0.3
9
0.1
9
0.1
6
22
25
9
27
98
5
0.1
0
13
22
93
10
03
88
82
17
99
1
OR
ISS
AS
ON
AP
UR
39
9
6 a
nd
7
0.5
3
0.4
7
0.2
0
12
88
6
33
00
5
0.0
4
88
33
7
79
03
39
4
13
43
1
OR
ISS
AS
UN
DA
RG
AR
H
40
0
1 a
nd
7
0.2
0
0.0
8
0.2
2
19
13
2
22
14
3
0.0
6
25
55
36
12
33
74
09
24
24
1
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
KA
RA
IKA
L
40
1
6
0.9
4
0.8
3
0.1
4
10
10
5
52
27
0
0
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
MA
HE
40
2
12
0.1
2
0.0
5
0.6
2
0
52
1
0
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
40
3
12
0.8
4
0.7
0
1.3
9
0
0.9
9
12
15
1
32
12
31
40
41
33
PO
ND
ICH
ER
RY
YA
NA
M
40
4
6
0.6
2
0.4
1
0.0
0
35
6
50
0
76
64
6
0
PU
NJA
BA
MR
ITS
AR
40
5
4
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.8
1
0
48
38
5
0.9
6
40
73
29
12
87
93
31
85
14
52
51
PU
NJA
BB
AT
HIN
DA
40
64
, 6 a
nd
10
1.0
01
.00
1.1
90
57
61
30
.67
27
23
43
31
02
77
67
94
67
72
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
51
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SP
UN
JAB
FA
RID
KO
T
40
7
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.6
0
0
58
04
6
0.9
3
13
51
07
16
37
73
58
8
37
56
6
PU
NJA
B
FA
TE
HG
AR
HA
HIB
40
8
4 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.1
0
0
63
51
5
0.9
5
10
06
90
39
72
97
25
0
35
81
4
PU
NJA
B
FIR
OZ
PU
R
40
9
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.4
7
0
58
60
4
0.8
5
43
42
30
55
95
61
48
2
96
26
9
PU
NJA
B
GU
RD
AS
PU
R
41
0
4
0.9
7
0.9
8
1.2
7
11
12
45
01
5
0.9
0
22
89
96
31
75
50
03
5
85
02
8
PU
NJA
B
HO
SH
IAR
PU
R
41
1
4
0.9
3
0.9
7
1.0
2
12
26
45
72
2
0.6
7
21
22
83
25
56
54
82
5
58
44
5
PU
NJA
B
JALA
ND
HA
R
41
2
4 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.3
1
0
53
57
2
0.9
9
21
82
21
45
66
37
28
7
78
31
2
PU
NJA
B
KA
PU
RT
HA
LA
41
3
4 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.3
4
0
61
38
1
0.8
8
11
69
52
40
40
77
26
0
54
16
4
PU
NJA
B
LUD
HIA
NA
41
4
4 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.6
7
0
69
14
5
0.8
4
31
32
85
74
03
04
14
9
11
95
21
PU
NJA
B
MA
NS
A
41
5
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.0
8
0
58
90
6
0.5
9
20
15
83
33
00
36
97
1
44
68
0
PU
NJA
B
MO
GA
41
6
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0
1.0
0
2.0
2
0
62
82
1
0.9
9
16
88
59
38
43
09
95
7
64
23
3
PU
NJA
B
MU
KT
SA
R
41
7
6 a
nd
10
1.0
0
1.0
0
0.6
9
0
60
39
4
0.4
2
23
36
52
19
82
30
39
6
29
12
7
PU
NJA
B
NA
WA
NS
HA
HR
41
8
4 a
nd
10
0.9
9
0.9
9
1.1
5
0
56
80
7
0.7
8
81
11
6
14
38
82
56
7
26
29
1
PU
NJA
B
P
AT
IALA
4
19
4
an
d 1
0
1
.00
1.0
0
1
.96
7
6
08
18
0
.98
2
48
22
4
8
89
05
10
25
8
00
34
PU
NJA
B
RU
PN
AG
AR
4
20
4
0
.92
0.9
6
1.0
7
12
0
44
59
3
0.7
4
12
94
74
1
27
58
04
44
3
67
96
PU
NJA
B
SA
NG
RU
R
42
1
4, 6
an
d 1
0
1.0
0 1
.00
2
.58
0
6
50
02
0
.95
4
63
60
6
12
71
95
38
33
1
39
96
9
RA
JAS
TH
AN
A
JME
R
42
2
4
0.3
5 0
.18
1
.44
1
10
51
7
36
4
0.1
4
45
63
11
8
05
76
66
8
77
11
2
RA
JAS
TH
AN
A
LWA
R
42
3
4 a
nd
11
0
.92
0.8
8
1.7
9
42
2
27
72
7
0.4
1
50
71
71
9
48
69
36
33
1
15
19
8
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
AN
SW
AR
A
42
4
6
0.5
7 0
.42
0
.49
1
11
21
1
43
83
0
.16
2
25
70
4
24
69
11
23
1
14
65
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
AR
AN
4
25
4
an
d 7
0
.85
0.8
5
1.2
0
13
86
1
31
05
4
0.3
2
33
84
97
1
50
25
97
27
3
87
35
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
AR
ME
R
42
6
4
0.1
5 0
.09
1
.24
1
67
2
90
9
0.7
4 1
79
24
29
2
52
03
03
78
2
49
77
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
HA
RA
TP
UR
4
27
4
an
d 1
1
0.8
7 0
.83
1
.16
0
2
53
50
0
.18
3
96
46
6
49
97
51
47
8
51
52
5
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
HIL
WA
RA
4
28
4
an
d 7
0
.53
0.3
1
1.2
9
38
11
8
14
60
4
0.2
3
44
34
33
1
40
41
00
14
1
22
04
7
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
IKA
NE
R
42
9
4
0.3
8 0
.13
1
.43
0
8
07
5
0.9
8 1
64
68
22
4
54
71
20
09
9
33
1
RA
JAS
TH
AN
B
UN
DI
4
30
4
an
d 6
0
.81
0.7
7
1.0
0
22
93
0.2
8
26
13
76
1
04
50
48
51
3
59
41
RA
JAS
TH
AN
C
HIT
TA
UR
GA
RH
4
31
4
an
d 7
0
.63
0.4
6
1.4
0
12
01
8
23
23
2
0.6
0
31
33
47
2
18
10
68
58
1
14
04
6
RA
JAS
TH
AN
C
HU
RU
4
32
4
0
.09
0.0
7
0.8
8
0
47
70
0
.86
11
72
48
9
22
76
14
91
7
94
45
RA
JAS
TH
AN
D
AU
SA
4
33
4
an
d 1
1
0.7
6 0
.70
1
.70
0
2
18
43
0
.47
2
29
49
3
29
00
40
79
1
50
07
9
RA
JAS
TH
AN
D
HA
UL
PU
R
4
34
4
an
d 1
1
0
.72
0.6
9
1
.28
1
59
2
2
37
96
0
.13
1
56
47
3
1
23
38
66
76
1
65
32
RA
JAS
TH
AN
DU
NG
AR
PU
R
43
5
No
ne
0.3
8
0.2
1
0.7
2
37
36
12
70
8
0.2
2
13
16
17
25
88
57
92
18
36
3
RA
JAS
TH
AN
GA
NG
AN
AG
AR
43
6
6 a
nd
11
0.8
1
0.6
9
0.4
4
0
23
09
1
0.8
5
76
98
60
24
15
26
8
10
6
RA
JAS
TH
AN
HA
NU
MA
NG
AR
H
43
7
4 a
nd
6
0.6
4
0.4
7
0.8
1
0
18
12
7
0.0
7
83
24
29
15
88
73
84
44
40
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JAIP
UR
43
8
4
0.6
4
0.4
4
2.0
7
92
5
18
46
3
0.6
1
68
44
31
64
33
63
07
4
13
23
23
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JAIS
ALM
ER
43
9
4 a
nd
6
0.2
8
0.1
4
1.9
9
0
33
17
0.9
6
72
56
85
78
77
77
33
24
14
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JALO
R
44
0
4
0.5
0
0.3
5
1.9
4
15
49
92
00
0.5
5
69
93
35
35
51
73
47
3
59
72
6
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JHA
LA
WA
R
44
1
4 a
nd
11
0.7
0
0.5
6
1.1
9
17
22
25
36
1
0.3
4
32
79
58
10
31
05
58
8
75
29
1
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JHU
NJH
UN
UN
44
2
4
0.5
8
0.5
1
2.2
6
16
02
7
0.8
8
42
45
76
79
34
73
87
0
45
36
4
RA
JAS
TH
AN
JOD
HP
UR
44
3
4
0.2
1
0.1
5
2.1
6
16
45
66
16
0.7
7
13
71
70
3
63
82
23
28
4
30
09
1
RA
JAS
TH
AN
KA
RA
ULI
44
4
4 a
nd
11
0.7
5
0.5
7
1.3
7
70
26
09
1
0.3
9
20
29
33
16
65
53
58
7
37
42
8
RA
JAS
TH
AN
KO
TA
44
5
4 a
nd
6
0.8
5
0.8
2
0.9
2
20
39
32
92
5
0.4
2
27
01
12
67
52
08
31
31
89
3
RA
JAS
TH
AN
NA
GA
UR
44
6
4
0.2
2
0.1
6
1.8
9
35
90
85
0.7
5
13
29
39
8
46
75
18
06
1
45
01
1
RA
JAS
TH
AN
PA
LI
44
7
4 a
nd
7
0.2
3
0.1
4
1.1
5
21
07
7
79
65
0.3
7
64
87
28
14
36
55
88
1
50
21
9
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
52
Sta
teD
istr
ict
S_N
oC
lust
ers
Irr_
HIr
r_A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
aE
lec_
WN
SA
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SR
AJA
ST
HA
N
RA
JSA
MA
ND
44
8
4
0.5
7
0.2
3
1.1
0
35
09
93
38
0.1
8
94
69
7
47
51
08
04
54
72
0
RA
JAS
TH
AN
SA
WA
I M
AD
HO
PU
R
44
9
4
0.6
5
0.6
4
1.2
6
12
0
18
68
6
0.2
3
29
06
21
16
29
97
19
5
39
98
6
RA
JAS
TH
AN
SIK
AR
45
0
4
0.5
2
0.4
2
1.4
7
0
14
15
7
0.8
4
53
56
78
60
79
68
47
1
58
74
8
RA
JAS
TH
AN
SIR
OH
I
45
1
4
0.4
7
0.4
2
1.1
3
93
83
13
71
8
0.5
7
16
79
28
89
64
70
20
20
28
6
RA
JAS
TH
AN
TO
NK
45
2
4
0.5
3
0.3
7
0.9
9
29
95
13
53
8
0.1
2
48
49
64
11
27
49
19
3
53
00
7
RA
JAS
TH
AN
UD
AIP
UR
45
3
4 a
nd
7
0.4
5
0.1
8
1.1
1
14
42
6
14
09
1
0.3
4
58
45
87
80
29
76
49
63
59
7
SIK
KIM
EA
ST
45
4
9
0.4
2
0.2
2
0.6
1
68
93
21
69
7
0
0
SIK
KIM
NO
RT
H
45
5
9
0.4
1
0.0
8
0.3
8
12
67
10
44
8
0
0
SIK
KIM
SO
UT
H
45
6
9
0.2
3
0.1
0
0.2
2
52
29
2
19
69
0
0
SIK
KIM
WE
ST
45
7
9
0.4
1
0.2
1
0.1
3
38
77
2
30
65
0
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
CH
EN
NA
I
45
8
12
2
.26
0
0
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
CO
IMB
AT
OR
E
45
9
5 a
nd
11
0.7
0
0.4
3
1.2
1
18
6
29
51
1
0.8
5
37
02
56
24
74
56
67
5
12
17
74
TA
MIL
NA
DU
C
UD
DA
LOR
E
4
60
5
an
d 6
0
.68
0.6
5
0
.86
2
44
4
5
38
72
0
.91
2
10
39
3
8
14
84
15
59
4
68
01
TA
MIL
NA
DU
D
HA
RM
AP
UR
I
46
1
5
0.4
0 0
.29
1
.33
2
57
8
40
31
2
0.6
7
33
50
83
4
66
70
63
92
1
31
71
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
D
IND
IGU
L
46
2
5
0.5
8 0
.37
1
.19
2
55
4
39
71
2
0.9
1
23
50
62
1
78
38
03
66
9
76
07
TA
MIL
NA
DU
E
RO
DE
4
63
5
an
d 6
0
.77
0.5
2
0.9
4
16
45
4
62
76
0
.81
1
99
35
3
81
61
18
84
4
13
71
63
TA
MIL
NA
DU
K
AN
CH
EE
PU
RA
M
46
4
7
0.9
4 0
.75
0
.66
8
26
31
3
97
81
0
.95
1
13
54
4
13
71
92
48
0
62
64
2
TA
MIL
NA
DU
K
AN
NIY
AK
UM
AR
I
46
5
6 a
nd
7
0.3
8 0
.41
0
.19
1
23
74
6
74
32
0
.87
7
93
54
5
25
58
95
2
63
4
TA
MIL
NA
DU
K
AR
UR
4
66
5
0
.36
0.2
4
0.9
2
11
92
2
30
71
0
.82
9
25
24
1
35
11
13
13
4
43
03
TA
MIL
NA
DU
M
AD
UR
AI
4
67
6
an
d 7
0
.75
0.5
9
0.5
8
44
80
4
34
79
7
0.8
6
14
71
95
8
89
60
52
8
55
33
6
TA
MIL
NA
DU
N
AG
AP
AT
TIN
AM
4
68
5
, 6 a
nd
11
0
.70
0.7
5
1.0
2
27
8
19
43
6
0.9
4
13
92
38
2
03
86
59
28
2
00
81
TA
MIL
NA
DU
N
AM
AK
KA
L
46
9
5 a
nd
10
0
.71
0.4
5
0.8
9
15
17
5
42
50
0
.97
1
54
97
7
26
85
79
92
9
70
31
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
P
ER
AM
BA
LUR
4
70
5
0
.27
0.2
5
0.8
5
28
69
3
21
97
0
.80
2
06
55
4
31
72
59
72
4
52
89
7
TA
MIL
NA
DU
P
UD
UK
KO
TTA
I
47
1
7
0.8
8 0
.66
0
.22
8
18
54
3
51
30
0
.85
1
71
98
9
12
72
25
74
0
41
30
5
TA
MIL
NA
DU
R
AM
AN
AT
HA
PU
RA
M
47
2
7
0.6
4 0
.52
0
.12
6
23
41
1
13
53
0
.75
2
35
21
8
23
26
43
71
6
13
4
TA
MIL
NA
DU
S
AL
EM
4
73
5
0
.59
0.4
5
1.6
4
94
4
32
27
0
.87
2
19
02
7
24
53
87
22
2
11
53
83
TA
MIL
NA
DU
S
IVA
GA
NG
A
47
4
7 a
nd
11
0
.84
0.6
5
0.1
6
55
74
1
21
77
2
0.6
7
12
80
38
4
93
66
65
8
22
28
7
TA
MIL
NA
DU
T
HA
NJA
VU
R
4
75
5
, 6 a
nd
7
0
.86
0.8
6
1
.04
1
48
63
4
23
98
0
.88
1
90
93
0
3
63
60
81
67
5
00
58
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TH
E N
ILG
IRIS
47
6
9
0.0
1
0.0
0
0.1
0
0
98
67
9
0.6
2
79
71
8
21
36
56
90
2
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TH
EN
I
47
7
5
0.5
0
0.4
4
0.8
6
98
94
56
96
0
0.9
8
99
44
8
86
34
79
18
28
67
1
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TH
IRU
VA
LLU
R
47
8
7
0.7
8
0.7
6
0.6
8
17
95
6
48
46
8
0.9
3
10
45
73
10
77
29
35
5
31
95
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TH
IRU
VA
RU
R
47
9
6 a
nd
11
0.9
9
0.9
9
0.7
1
0
18
40
5
0.8
6
14
01
06
93
56
09
51
16
81
9
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TIR
UC
HIR
AP
PA
LLI
48
0
6
0.7
2
0.5
4
0.7
9
81
13
42
68
0
0.8
5
18
66
38
24
63
18
51
0
84
29
6
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TIR
UN
ELV
ELI
48
1
7
0.7
0
0.4
5
0.5
8
18
53
49
47
24
3
0.7
7
13
75
85
13
91
76
16
1
88
58
0
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TIR
UV
AN
AM
ALA
I
48
2
5. 7
an
d 1
1
0.7
5
0.6
0
0.8
5
84
95
6
29
61
6
0.9
3
25
05
65
41
77
68
62
4
17
08
49
TA
MIL
NA
DU
TU
TIC
OR
IN
48
3
7
0.4
0
0.2
0
0.4
3
15
51
9
34
04
5
0.7
5
18
01
47
43
53
36
31
26
59
1
TA
MIL
NA
DU
VE
LLO
RE
48
4
5 a
nd
7
0.6
5
0.4
6
1.0
5
34
83
4
40
06
4
0.8
6
19
37
80
43
56
65
06
2
12
08
84
TA
MIL
NA
DU
VIL
UP
PU
RA
M
48
5
5 a
nd
7
0.7
6
0.6
7
1.0
3
97
18
9
40
84
6
0.9
2
36
55
59
10
68
78
13
01
17
95
79
TA
MIL
NA
DU
VIR
UD
HU
NA
GA
R
48
6
7
0.6
3
0.4
1
0.6
9
12
79
3
19
72
5
0.6
7
13
27
64
68
55
08
00
38
75
6
TR
IPU
RA
DH
AL
AI
48
7
9
0.1
0
0.0
8
0.0
2
46
6
0.6
3
34
61
3
13
74
97
8
8
TR
IPU
RA
NO
RT
HT
RIP
UR
A4
88
90
.28
0.1
30
.04
11
81
.00
44
07
61
58
45
57
15
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
53
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
ST
RIP
UR
A
SO
UT
HT
RIP
UR
A
48
9
9
0.2
4
0.2
3
0.0
5
17
65
0.7
2
79
47
6
72
78
76
9
88
5
TR
IPU
RA
WE
ST
TR
IPU
RA
49
0
9
0.3
9
0.2
9
0.1
2
82
1
0.8
9
97
86
0
89
05
51
4
11
83
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
AG
RA
49
1
4
0.9
0
0.8
7
1.1
4
0
37
87
9
0.1
7
28
26
57
37
57
29
37
0
70
51
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
ALIG
AR
H
49
2
4
0.9
7
0.9
7
0.8
2
5
37
00
8
0.2
8
29
37
06
43
17
27
21
9
66
64
3
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
ALLH
AB
AD
49
3
4
0.5
2
0.6
3
0.8
1
16
82
25
14
4
0.2
7
31
56
28
25
42
30
34
6
43
63
9
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
AM
BE
DK
AR
NA
GA
R
49
4
6
0.8
9
0.9
1
0.5
7
0
38
30
1
0.0
9
16
77
56
16
27
58
84
7
60
09
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
AU
RA
IYA
49
5
No
ne
0.8
9
0.8
6
0.6
9
0
30
23
2
0.0
3
14
48
87
19
65
90
26
8
37
29
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
AZ
AM
GA
RH
49
6
6
0.8
6
0.8
6
0.6
5
15
7
0.2
0
30
13
93
23
77
02
58
9
72
86
6
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
BA
GH
PA
T
49
7
4 a
nd
10
0.9
7
0.9
7
0.9
8
0
78
10
6
0.8
2
11
15
06
10
95
23
61
0
25
95
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
BA
HR
AIC
H
49
8
No
ne
0.5
4
0.4
6
0.5
5
12
26
45
1
0.0
1
32
76
72
14
62
53
88
3
76
40
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
BA
LL
IA
49
9
2
0.3
6
0.6
8
0.6
6
12
79
24
41
1
0.0
9
22
07
09
16
63
33
80
9
45
36
7
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
BA
LR
AM
PU
R
50
0
2
0.3
4
0.3
1
0.5
0
15
3
31
80
7
0.0
1
21
71
92
13
05
29
10
9
47
67
3
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
AN
DA
5
01
N
on
e
0
.49
0.4
0
0
.55
1
40
1
54
31
0
.09
3
44
69
3
6
63
26
59
1
1
61
41
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
AR
AB
AN
KI
5
02
6
0
.86
0.8
6
0.6
4
0
45
44
3
0.0
1
25
92
73
2
44
65
79
14
9
39
88
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
AR
EIL
LY
50
3
No
ne
0
.87
0.9
1
0.6
0
78
9
41
94
6
0.0
1
32
68
27
2
85
78
35
79
1
25
18
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
AS
TI
5
04
6
0
.85
0.7
0
0.7
9
0
32
32
1
0.0
2
20
01
38
1
58
21
75
01
7
58
11
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
IJN
OR
5
05
6
an
d 1
0
0.8
8 0
.87
0
.67
0
6
10
05
0
.29
3
41
98
8
35
36
06
37
5
92
67
9
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
UD
AU
N
50
6
4
0.8
9 0
.89
0
.85
0
3
34
20
0
.01
4
18
64
6
24
58
12
25
4
11
35
31
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
B
ULA
ND
SH
AH
R
50
7
4
0.9
0 0
.90
0
.82
5
5
48
86
5
0.5
3
28
70
31
3
20
76
50
79
6
40
23
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
C
HA
ND
AU
LI
50
8
6 a
nd
11
0
.94
0.9
5
0.3
8
31
5
28
71
1
0.1
9
13
25
23
5
20
21
11
4
13
04
5
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
C
HIT
RA
KO
OT
5
09
1
0
.27
0.2
3
0.6
6
13
14
1
49
59
0
.14
1
73
39
9
26
71
71
96
8
00
7
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
D
EO
RIA
5
10
1
1
0.8
6 0
.80
0
.78
2
7
29
58
9
0.0
1
19
56
70
1
49
82
01
01
9
07
85
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
E
TA
H
51
1
4
0.9
8 0
.95
0
.88
0
3
54
19
0
.01
3
22
76
3
27
79
54
62
7
96
66
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
E
TA
WA
H
51
2
6
0.8
3 0
.79
0
.46
0
3
54
77
0
.04
1
45
44
1
25
68
63
29
8
34
90
7
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
FA
IZA
BA
D
51
3
6
0.9
6 0
.95
0
.62
0
3
80
05
0
.05
1
56
54
7
41
88
11
18
9
70
90
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
FA
RR
UK
HA
BA
D
51
4
4 a
nd
10
0
.80
0.8
8
0.8
0
0
55
90
6
0.1
1
14
74
60
1
50
40
43
59
4
06
95
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
FA
TE
HP
UR
5
15
4
0
.56
0.6
1
0.9
5
36
8
26
02
4
0.2
1
28
59
18
3
09
09
94
33
4
32
43
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
F
IRO
ZA
BA
D
5
16
4
an
d 6
0
.96
0.9
6
1
.17
0
4
15
25
0
.16
1
81
94
1
2
95
68
13
93
4
61
89
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
GA
UT
AM
BU
DD
HA
NA
GA
R
51
7
4, 6
an
d 1
1
0.9
9
0.9
9
0.9
3
0
23
61
3
0.0
4
71
35
5
59
89
83
42
25
02
7
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
GH
AZ
IAB
AD
51
8
4 a
nd
10
0.9
3
0.9
5
1.0
5
12
42
69
05
7
0.4
2
12
98
62
17
26
96
97
5
36
12
8
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
GH
AZ
IPU
R
51
9
11
0.8
9
0.7
3
0.6
8
0
27
20
8
0.2
9
25
64
71
43
75
99
52
4
78
92
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
GO
ND
A
52
0
No
ne
0.8
0
0.7
9
0.7
1
0
31
21
5
0.0
1
29
78
35
24
68
04
88
3
10
73
50
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
GO
RA
KH
PU
R
52
1
6 a
nd
11
0.8
0
0.8
1
0.5
5
0
26
89
7
0.0
2
24
97
21
15
68
02
37
8
88
69
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
HA
MIR
PU
R_U
52
2
No
ne
0.3
7
0.3
7
0.6
4
90
7
16
23
9
0.0
7
25
70
06
20
67
34
10
18
11
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
HA
RD
OI
52
3
No
ne
0.8
2
0.8
5
0.6
9
0
31
49
8
0.0
1
43
19
56
22
61
16
92
9
87
99
8
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
HA
TH
RA
S
52
4
4 a
nd
10
0.9
8
0.9
8
0.8
5
0
50
46
0
0.2
5
14
86
65
0
53
05
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
JALA
UN
52
5
No
ne
0.6
4
0.5
3
0.2
9
21
08
26
49
9
0.0
7
35
53
50
59
39
22
44
16
28
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
JAU
NP
UR
52
6
4 a
nd
11
0.7
5
0.7
8
0.8
9
77
27
17
1
0.2
2
28
01
08
28
72
34
05
8
78
36
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
JHA
NS
I
52
7
No
ne
0.6
9
0.6
2
0.6
8
15
43
20
67
7
0.0
1
32
36
28
99
63
38
39
44
20
9
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
JYO
TIB
AP
HU
LE
NA
GA
R
52
8
4 a
nd
10
0.9
1
0.7
0
1.0
8
0
58
02
8
0.0
1
17
36
44
15
40
15
95
3
78
69
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KA
NN
AU
J
52
9
No
ne
0.7
9
0.8
8
0.6
7
27
48
12
9
0.0
9
13
84
99
32
68
04
99
5
31
80
3
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
54
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SU
TT
AR
PR
AD
ES
H
KA
NP
UR
DE
HA
T
53
0
11
0.7
2
0.7
3
0.6
8
0
27
74
2
0.0
5
22
12
63
19
86
20
12
2
33
17
6
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KA
NP
UR
NA
GA
R
53
1
4
0.8
8
0.7
7
0.8
5
62
3
42
99
0
0.0
9
17
95
74
21
41
33
69
7
36
89
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KA
US
HA
MB
I
53
2
4
0.5
2
0.6
9
0.9
1
32
24
83
8
0.1
6
12
58
85
12
46
40
62
9
22
54
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KH
ER
I
53
3
No
ne
0.7
0
0.8
1
0.6
2
0
46
37
9
0.0
4
48
41
27
36
76
70
08
8
12
68
20
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
KU
SH
INA
GA
R
53
4
6
0.8
1
0.7
7
0.4
7
0
41
92
2
0.0
0
22
40
26
13
78
81
43
0
71
15
6
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
LA
LIT
PU
R
53
5
11
0.8
6
0.8
5
0.6
2
54
43
19
34
2
0.0
2
29
26
10
12
65
32
42
7
30
97
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
LUC
KN
OW
53
6
6 a
nd
10
0.8
8
0.9
1
0.6
9
0
53
65
1
0.0
5
13
65
07
11
86
15
83
3
39
04
7
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
MA
HO
BA
53
7
4
0.4
1
0.4
1
1.1
2
39
2
15
21
8
0.0
1
22
83
50
50
53
82
10
19
44
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
MA
HA
RA
JGA
NJ
53
8
No
ne
0.7
5
0.8
3
0.6
2
43
8
39
70
9
0.0
0
20
32
42
12
63
26
30
4
72
17
5
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
MA
INP
UR
I
53
9
4 a
nd
6
0.8
3
0.8
6
0.8
6
0
35
94
2
0.0
4
17
78
32
44
72
27
41
0
59
96
4
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
MA
TH
UR
A
54
0
4 a
nd
6
0.9
7
0.9
6
0.9
2
0
32
77
2
0.0
3
26
39
81
55
61
90
90
4
62
42
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
MA
U
54
1
No
ne
0.6
0
0.7
1
0.7
0
0
28
61
0
0.3
6
12
57
50
86
61
31
84
27
33
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
M
EE
RU
T
5
42
1
0
0
.98
0.9
8
0
.70
1
3
8
18
55
0
.48
1
97
20
2
1
92
55
60
51
5
36
67
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
M
IRZ
AP
UR
5
43
6
0
.66
0.4
6
0.6
2
24
1
20
76
8
0.1
8
19
43
42
7
71
92
77
8
25
95
8
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
M
OR
AD
AB
AD
5
44
4
0
.89
0.7
4
0.8
5
23
4
80
56
0
.01
3
10
49
0
33
07
81
60
2
11
96
90
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
M
UZ
AF
FA
RN
AG
AR
5
45
6
an
d 1
0
0.9
8 0
.98
0
.66
5
7
73
53
0
.35
3
15
43
7
56
70
05
41
2
92
80
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
P
ILIB
HIT
5
46
N
on
e
0.8
4 0
.90
0
.65
0
4
48
53
0
.01
2
23
06
2
36
58
15
89
5
86
17
9
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
P
RA
TA
PG
AR
H
54
7
4 a
nd
6
0.6
1 0
.65
1
.41
1
5
25
42
8
0.0
6
21
73
24
4
48
73
72
57
1
07
02
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
R
AE
BA
RE
LI
5
48
6
an
d 1
1
0.8
9 0
.79
0
.73
0
2
76
58
0
.09
1
97
87
4
36
42
52
76
6
79
33
1
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
R
AM
PU
R
54
9
4 a
nd
6
0.9
8 0
.99
1
.07
1
06
4
63
69
0
.01
1
84
38
0
22
43
80
06
0
80
92
0
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
AH
AR
AN
PU
R
55
0
4 a
nd
10
0
.85
0.8
5
1.3
3
1
63
31
1
0.3
0
28
78
08
4
53
25
80
01
8
73
81
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
AN
TK
AB
IRN
AG
AR
5
51
6
0
.87
0.8
1
0.6
7
23
3
30
39
0
.01
1
21
77
9
83
91
02
96
4
20
24
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
AN
TR
AV
IDA
SN
AG
AR
5
52
4
0
.55
0.6
5
0.9
3
63
2
09
78
0
.87
6
95
28
5
64
60
82
4
81
11
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
HA
HJA
HA
NP
UR
5
53
6
0
.95
0.9
6
0.5
9
0
39
37
7
0.0
1
35
07
18
2
18
01
99
08
8
38
97
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
HR
AW
AS
TI
5
54
N
on
e
0.5
1 0
.45
0
.70
0
2
23
91
0
.00
1
31
85
4
14
89
63
36
1
38
45
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
IDD
HA
RT
HN
AG
AR
5
55
6
an
d 1
1
0.7
7 0
.69
0
.64
7
89
2
31
22
0
.01
2
35
54
6
97
89
96
20
5
35
51
UT
TA
RP
RA
DE
SH
S
ITA
PU
R
55
6
No
ne
0
.73
0.7
8
0.7
0
0
37
10
1
0.0
1
43
11
76
2
88
77
26
43
1
31
75
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
S
ON
BH
AD
RA
5
57
1
0
.15
0.1
5
0
.43
5
43
9
1
45
75
0
.11
1
68
84
4
4
29
71
16
3
1
51
37
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
SU
LTA
NP
UR
55
8
6
0.7
7
0.8
1
0.7
3
24
6
33
24
1
0.0
5
17
68
41
48
52
52
26
0
14
07
69
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
UN
NA
O
55
9
No
ne
0.8
6
0.8
4
0.6
5
0
32
86
1
0.0
1
30
88
43
36
58
82
21
1
72
42
2
UT
TA
R P
RA
DE
SH
VA
RA
NA
SI
56
0
4 a
nd
11
0.7
5
0.7
7
0.8
6
0
27
09
1
0.7
9
94
10
4
94
90
38
49
15
40
1
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
ALM
OR
A
56
1
9
0.2
8
0.0
6
0.0
0
11
74
7
32
06
4
78
95
0
15
86
06
0
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
BA
GE
SH
WA
R
56
2
9
0.5
7
0.2
0
0.0
0
74
73
30
92
4
23
78
6
62
00
0
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
CH
AM
OLI
56
3
9
0.1
8
0.0
4
0.0
0
89
15
43
95
8
0.0
0
31
07
1
11
30
0
1
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
CH
AM
PA
WA
T
56
4
9
0.1
8
0.1
1
0.0
0
33
95
28
70
0
0.6
6
21
46
4
32
09
26
0
64
4
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
DE
HR
AD
UN
56
5
7 a
nd
9
0.7
3
0.5
0
0.1
2
18
85
1
39
83
1
0.7
0
43
67
0
42
84
39
3
40
5
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
HA
RD
WA
R
56
6
9
0.8
8
0.8
9
0.5
6
53
03
60
56
1
0.2
6
10
96
08
22
28
59
95
8
25
77
6
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
NA
INIT
AL
56
7
7 a
nd
9
0.5
1
0.4
7
0.4
3
22
07
3
51
48
3
0.3
3
46
03
3
49
73
41
9
74
9
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
PIT
HO
RA
GA
RH
56
8
9
0.2
3
0.0
8
0.0
0
90
81
29
13
5
38
17
3
59
35
0
0
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
LR
UD
RA
PR
AY
AG
56
99
0.3
80
.11
0.0
04
36
62
61
51
19
94
70
0
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
LT
EH
RI
GA
RH
WA
L5
70
7 a
nd
90
.51
0.0
90
.00
25
08
41
94
24
0.0
01
27
14
23
20
01
6
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
55
Sta
te
Dis
tric
t
S_N
o
Clu
ste
rs
Irr_
H
Irr_
A
GW
_De
vt
T_C
CA
Pro
d_H
a
Ele
c_W
NS
A
kW
h-e
qu
iv.
GW
SU
TT
AR
AN
CH
AL
UD
HA
M S
ING
H N
AG
AR
57
1
7 a
nd
9
0.9
0
0.9
3
0.7
9
80
58
5
49
18
5
0.0
2
13
59
59
86
38
77
96
25
90
7
UT
TA
RA
NC
HA
L
UT
TA
RK
AS
HI
57
2
9
0.5
7
0.1
3
0.0
0
67
72
42
28
6
27
66
5
26
06
7
0
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
B
AN
KU
RA
5
73
7
0
.52
0.4
3
0
.40
1
07
86
2
5
39
66
0
.21
2
82
06
1
5
09
55
32
7
1
91
19
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
B
AR
DD
HA
MA
N
57
4
6, 7
an
d 1
0
0.9
0 0
.88
0
.36
2
35
97
5
96
64
0
.47
4
65
98
4
16
71
27
78
0
34
64
1
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
B
IRB
HU
M
57
5
6 a
nd
10
0
.77
0.6
3
0.3
4
58
75
6
74
97
0
.68
2
91
15
8
65
82
99
11
1
12
82
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
D
AK
SH
IN D
INA
JPU
R
57
6
10
0
.80
0.7
1
0.4
6
13
7
63
14
3
0.1
3
18
90
77
6
53
60
78
3
24
09
6
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
D
AR
JILI
NG
5
77
9
0
.41
0.1
2
0.0
5
48
67
8
16
17
0
.02
1
02
55
1
37
39
71
5
12
68
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
H
AO
RA
5
78
6
an
d 1
0
0.7
3 0
.67
0
.25
6
95
1
11
48
15
0
.53
9
54
59
2
56
88
97
0
79
1
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
H
UG
LI
5
79
6
an
d 1
0
0.9
4 0
.90
0
.45
7
50
2
75
91
5
0.6
6
21
44
12
9
71
92
07
1
16
08
2
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
JA
LP
AIG
UR
I
58
0
7
0.4
2 0
.44
0
.04
2
27
66
7
21
60
0
.05
3
02
20
6
20
22
89
25
1
07
31
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
K
OC
H B
IHA
R
58
1
10
0
.78
0.6
1
0.1
7
50
6
99
65
0
.04
2
58
73
7
54
94
68
69
4
23
95
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
K
OLK
ATA
5
82
1
2
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
M
ALD
AH
5
83
N
on
e
0.6
5 0
.64
0
.40
1
72
1
75
06
9
0.1
0
28
20
94
1
12
53
23
07
2
61
40
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
M
ED
INIP
UR
5
84
7
an
d 1
0
0.7
0 0
.58
0
.32
2
28
38
6
26
71
0
.28
7
75
56
9
23
08
97
28
1
61
18
5
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
M
UR
SH
IDA
BA
D
58
5
10
0
.92
0.8
6
0.7
9
24
25
8
78
26
0
.18
4
33
48
7
24
97
81
96
2
68
71
1
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
N
AD
IA
58
6
4 a
nd
10
0
.94
0.9
1
0.9
2
16
78
8
89
97
0
.13
3
35
98
4
29
27
36
81
5
95
16
3
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
N
OR
TH
24
PA
RG
AN
AS
5
87
1
0
0.7
3 0
.69
0
.62
1
57
3
73
99
1
0.1
1
26
44
78
1
89
77
33
98
5
24
72
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
PU
RU
LIY
A
58
8
1 a
nd
7
0.1
9
0.1
0
0.0
9
55
54
4
34
79
4
0.0
0
21
06
17
27
25
12
8
36
26
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
SO
UT
H 2
4 P
AR
GA
NA
S
58
9
7
0.5
0
0.3
2
0.0
0
36
66
1
54
00
9
0.0
6
35
95
43
38
10
82
75
69
42
WE
ST
BE
NG
AL
UT
TA
R D
INA
JPU
R
59
0
10
0.9
0
0.8
6
0.4
6
35
1
75
59
9
0.0
3
24
51
83
14
18
22
96
7
44
79
5
HAR KHET KO PANIRethinking Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
56
2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #01
Har Khet Ko Pani?(Water to Every Farm?)
Emulate Madhya Pradesh's Irriga�on Reform
Tushaar ShahGourav MishraPankaj KelaPennan Chinnasamy
Pipe assisted underground taming of surface floodsThe experience with Holiyas in north Gujarat
Jonas Bunsen Rahul Rathod
2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #02
Can solar pumps energize Bihar's agriculture?
Neha DurgaShilp VermaNishita GuptaRavi KiranAnanta Pathak
2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #03
Mahima GuptaVandana RavindraAlka PalrechaWastewater Irriga�on in Karnataka
An explora�on
2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #04
MEASURING THE INVISIBLE Exploi�ng the water-energy nexus to es�mate private,
urban groundwater dra�
Angèle Cauchois
2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #05
FARMER PRODUCER COMPANIESFermen�ng New Wine for New Bo�les
Tushaar Shah2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #06
PROSOPIS JULIFLORA IN THE IRRIGATION TANKS OF TAMIL NADU
R. Sakthivadivel2016 Water Policy Research Highlight #07
Recent IWMI-Tata Publica�ons
These Highlights can be downloaded from h�p://iwmi-tata.blogspot.in
IWMI Headquarters127 Sunil Mawatha, Pelawa�e, Ba�aramulla, Colombo, Sri LankaMailing AddressP. O. Box 2075, Colombo, Sri LankaTel: +94 11 2880000, 2784080 Fax: +94 11 2786854 Email: [email protected] Website: www.iwmi.org
IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program“Jal Tarang”Near Smru� Apartments, Behind IRMA GateMangalpura, Anand 388001, Gujarat, IndiaTel: +91 2692 263816, 263817 Email: [email protected]: h�p://iwmi-tata.blogspot.in
IWMI is amember ofthe CGIARConsortiumand leadsthe:
RES EARCH PROGRA ON
Water, Land and Ecos stems
The IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program (ITP) was launched in 2000 as a co-equal partnership between the
Interna�onal Water Management Ins�tute (IWMI), Colombo and Sir Ratan Tata Trusts (SRTT), Mumbai. The program
presents new perspec�ves and prac�cal solu�ons derived from the wealth of research done in India on water
resource management. Its objec�ve is to help policy makers at the central, state and local levels address their water
challenges – in areas such as Sustainable groundwater management, water scarcity, and rural poverty – by transla�ng
research findings into prac�cal policy recommenda�ons.
Through this program, IWMI collaborates with a range of partners across India to iden�fy, analyse and document
relevant water management approaches and current prac�ces. These prac�ces are assessed and synthesized for
maximum policy impact and published as IWMI-Tata Policy Papers, Water Policy Research Highlights and IWMI-Tata
Comments. The research underlying these publica�ons was funded with support from IWMI, Tata Trusts, CGIAR
Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) and CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change,
Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). The views expressed in the publica�ons are of the author/s alone and not of
ITP's funding partners. All IWMI-Tata publica�ons are open access and freely downloadable from the Program's blog:
h�p://iwmi-tata.blogspot.com
About IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program